ENTP + ENTP
ENTP biyu: dacewa a soyayya, abota da aiki
ENTP biyu suna tarayya a dukkan haruffa huɗu: E (mai son jama’a), N (mai hasashe), T (mai tsauri) da P (mai sassauci). Hakan yana sa rayuwar yau da kullum ta zama sananniya, amma kamanceceniya ita kaɗai tana hasashen kaɗan ne. Abin da yake da muhimmanci shi ne inda ku duka biyu kuke a sifofin da suke tantance ingancin dangantaka.
Abin da suke tarayya a kai
Ku duka biyu kuna samun kuzari daga mutane da ayyuka. Ku yi tsammanin cikakken jadawalin zamantakewa da yanke shawara cikin sauri yayin tattaunawa.
Yana daidai da harafin gargajiya na E/I, wanda yake da alaƙa mai ƙarfi da son jama’a na Big Five.
Ku duka biyu ra’ayoyi, sababbin abubuwa da tattaunawar “in da a ce” suna jan hankalinku. Ku yi tsammanin dogayen hirarraki da sha’awar tare ta gwada sababbin abubuwa.
Yana daidai da harafin N/S, wanda yake da alaƙa mai ƙarfi da buɗaɗɗen tunani na Big Five.
Ku duka biyu kuna karkata ga magana kai tsaye da shakka. Ku yi tsammanin gaskiya da muhawara, kuma ku lura kada tsauri ya zama salon magana na kullum.
Yana daidai da harafin F/T (F = sauƙin kai mafi yawa). Alaƙarsa da MBTI matsakaiciya ce.
Ku duka biyu kuna son barin hanyoyi a buɗe da ƙirƙira nan take. Ku yi tsammanin rayuwa ta nan take, kuma ku yanke shawarar wanda zai kula da muhimman ayyuka masu gundura.
Yana daidai da harafin J/P (J = ƙwazo mafi yawa). Alaƙarsa da MBTI matsakaiciya ce.
Abin da bayanai suka nuna game da ENTP
Daga namu nazarin mutane 19,718 da suka amsa kalaman IPIP na Big Five na jama’a (Open Psychometrics), aka ba su maki daidai da wannan gwaji.
| Sifa | ENTP |
|---|---|
| Son jama’a | 74 |
| Buɗaɗɗen tunani | 75 |
| Sauƙin kai | 27 |
| Ƙwazo | 23 |
| Natsuwar zuciya | 51 |
| Kaso a samfurin | 5% |
Lambobin matsakaicin percentile ne (50 = tsakiyar samfurin). Haruffa huɗu suna raba kowace sifa a tsakiya, don haka bisa tsarinsu waɗannan matsakaita suna kusa da 75 ko 25. Natsuwar zuciya ba ta cikin haruffa huɗu, don haka tana nuna bambance-bambance na gaske tsakanin nau’o’i.
Natsuwar zuciya ita ce sifar da haruffa huɗu suke barinta a waje. Mutanen ENTP suna da matsakaicin percentile 51 a cikinta, kuma 54% daga cikinsu suna da harafin C, mai natsuwa.
Idan masoyan biyu mutanen ENTP ne da aka zaɓa ba da tsari ba, a kashi 29% na lokuta duka biyu za su sami harafin C (mai natsuwa), a kashi 21% kuma duka biyu harafin R (mai saurin ji). Natsuwar zuciyar kowane masoyi tana daga cikin abubuwan da suka fi bayyana wajen hasashen gamsuwa a dangantaka.[2]
Matsakaita suna bayyana rukunoni ne, ba ku ba. Mutane da yawa na kowane nau’i suna samun maki mai nisa da su, shi ya sa gwajin yake nuna percentile ɗinku na kanku.
ENTP biyu a soyayya
Ƙarfi
- ENTP biyu yawanci suna sama da matsakaici a Son jama’a (harafin E). Son jama’a na masoyi yana da raunanniyar alaƙa da gamsuwa.[2]
Abubuwan da za su iya kawo saɓani
- ENTP yawanci ba sa sama a Sauƙin kai. Yawan sauƙin kai yana hasashen saɓani mai gina jiki da masoya masu ƙarin gamsuwa. A wannan haɗin, ƙoƙari na da gangan yana da riba.[2][3]
- ENTP yawanci ba sa sama a Ƙwazo. Ƙwazo yana hasashen gamsuwar masoyi. Ƙarancin ƙwazo yana da alaƙa da rashin aminci a yankuna dabam-dabam na duniya. A wannan haɗin, ƙoƙari na da gangan yana da riba.[2][4]
Shawarwarin aiki (shawara, ba sakamakon bincike ba)
- Masoya biyu masu magana kai tsaye suna buƙatar ƙa’idar da suka yarda da ita ta saɓani: ku soki takamaiman hali, ba halittar mutum ba, kuma ku dakata idan ɗayanku ya fara hasala.
- Ku saka nauye-nauyen da kuke tarayya a kai (kuɗaɗen biya, ayyukan gida, tsare-tsare) a cikin wani tsari na waje, kamar jerin aiki ko kalanda ta tare, don kada cikawa ta dogara da tunawa ko yanayin zuciya.
ENTP biyu a matsayin abokai
Ƙarfi
- ENTP biyu yawanci suna sama da matsakaici a Son jama’a (harafin E). Son jama’a yana hasashen samun abokai da sauri da kuma da yawa.[5][6]
Abubuwan da za su iya kawo saɓani
- ENTP yawanci ba sa sama a Sauƙin kai. Ana yawan zaɓar mutane masu yawan sauƙin kai a matsayin abokai, kuma abotarsu tana ƙara ɗorewa. A wannan haɗin, ƙoƙari na da gangan yana da riba.[5][6]
Shawarwarin aiki (shawara, ba sakamakon bincike ba)
- Ku ci gaba da raha, amma lokaci-lokaci ku faɗi a fili abin da kuke yaba wa juna. Abokai masu magana kai tsaye sukan ɗauka cewa ɗayan ya riga ya sani.
ENTP biyu a wurin aiki
Ƙarfi
Yawanci babu ɗayan nau’o’in da yake sama da matsakaici a sifofin da suka fi hasashen yadda irin wannan dangantaka za ta kasance. Don haka halaye sun fi dacewa muhimmanci. Albishir: ana iya koyon halaye.
Abubuwan da za su iya kawo saɓani
- ENTP yawanci ba sa sama a Ƙwazo. Ƙwazo shi ne mai hasashe na hali mafi daidaito ga ƙwazon aiki. A wannan haɗin, ƙoƙari na da gangan yana da riba.[7]
Shawarwarin aiki (shawara, ba sakamakon bincike ba)
- Babu ɗayanku da yake bin diddigin ƙananan abubuwa ta ɗabi’a. Ku yi amfani da bayyanannun ranakun ƙarshe, allon ayyuka na tare da ɗan gajeren taron duba aiki na kowane mako.
Yadda harafi na biyar da na shida suke sauya hoton
Kowane nau’i yana da rassa huɗu. Ƙarin haruffa biyu su ne ainihin waɗanda gwajin haruffa huɗu yake barinsu, kuma ga dangantaka sun fi yawancin haruffa huɗu na asali muhimmanci.
Natsuwar zuciya: C (Mai natsuwa) ko R (Mai saurin ji)
- Natsuwar zuciya (harafi na biyar, C ko R) ba a auna ta a nau’o’in haruffa huɗu, duk da haka tana daga cikin sifofin hali mafi dogaro wajen hasashen gamsuwa da ɗorewar dangantaka. Tana da muhimmanci a kowane mutum: masoyi mai ƙarin natsuwa yana taimakawa, ko da wane nau’i ne ɗayan.[2][8]
- Idan ku duka biyu C ne (masu natsuwa), kuna farawa daga matsayin da shaida ta fi goyon baya. Idan ɗayanku R ne (mai saurin ji), babban haɗarin shi ne damuwa ta koma rikici. Faɗin “ina cikin damuwa ne, ban yi fushi da kai ba” yana taimaka wa ɗayan ya mayar da martani yadda ya dace.
- Idan ku duka biyu R ne, ku yi tsammanin damuwa za ta yaɗu daga ɗayanku zuwa ɗayan. Duk da haka, wannan ita ce sifar da ta fi sauyawa: yawanci mutane suna ƙara natsuwa da shekaru, kuma tana sauyawa ta hanyar da ake iya aunawa da jinya da ƙoƙari na da gangan.[9][10][11]
- A wurin aiki, natsuwar zuciya ita ce alaƙa mafi ƙarfi tsakanin hali da gamsuwa da aiki. Idan ɗayanku R ne, sanar da shi sauye-sauye tun da wuri ba ya da tsada kuma yana taimakawa sosai (shawara ce, ba sakamakon bincike ba).[12]
Gaskiya da tawali’u: M (Mai tawali’u) ko A (Mai buri)
- Gaskiya da tawali’u (harafi na shida, M ko A) suna hasashen halin adalci da haɗin kai inda ake buƙatar aminci, kuma a kan haka ne abota da dangantaka suke tafiya.[13]
- Ƙarancin gaskiya da tawali’u (A) yana kama da sifofin yaudara na “dark triad”, kuma ita ce sifa a tsarin HEXACO da ta fi alaƙa da halaye masu cutarwa a wurin aiki. Idan ku duka biyu M ne, ku duka kuna da sifar da take da alaƙa da adalci; idan ɗayanku A ne, bayyana gaskiya game da kuɗi, yabo da matsayi ya fi muhimmanci.[14][15]
- Ku sani cewa manyan nazarce-nazarce kan gamsuwar masoya sun yi amfani da Big Five, wanda ba shi da wani ɓangare dabam na gaskiya da tawali’u, don haka shaidar wannan harafi a soyayya ba ta kai shaidarsa a kan aminci da haɗin kai ba.[2][16]
Dalilin da ya sa kamanceceniya ba ta da muhimmanci kamar yadda ake zato
- A samfurori na ƙasa daga ƙasashe uku, kamanceceniyar halin masoya biyu ba ta bayyana kusan komai ba bayan sifofin kowannensu.[1]
- Sifofin da suke hasashen ingancin dangantaka da gaske su ne natsuwar zuciya, sauƙin kai da ƙwazo na kowane mutum, kuma waɗannan sifofi suna sauyawa da shekaru da ƙoƙari.[2][9][11]
- Haruffa huɗu suna daidai da sifofin Big Five na gaske, amma T/F da J/P a matsakaici ne kawai, don haka kowane mutum zai iya bambanta da matakan da aka saba gani a nau’insa.[17]
- Alaƙoƙi kamar waɗannan tsakanin sifofi da sakamako ana maimaita su da kyau a bincike, amma kowacce ƙarama ce, kuma yawanci ɗan ƙasa da yadda aka ruwaito tun farko. Suna sauya yiwuwa; ba sa yanke sakamako.[18]
Nau’i matsakaici ne. Ku yi gwajin kyauta, sannan ku gayyaci wani ENTP don ku ga inda ku duka biyu kuke da gaske a dukkan sifofi shida.
Tambayoyin da ake yawan yi
Shin ENTP biyu sun dace da juna?
Babu wani bincike da ya nuna cewa wani haɗin nau’o’i ya fi wani dacewa da tabbas, kuma kamanceceniyar hali tana bayyana ƙalilan ne kawai na gamsuwa a dangantaka. ENTP biyu suna tarayya a dukkan haruffa huɗu. Abubuwan da suka fi hasashe su ne natsuwar zuciya, sauƙin kai da ƙwazo na kowannensu, waɗanda nau’i mai haruffa huɗu yake kama wani ɓangare nasu kawai.
Shin ENTP biyu masoya ne masu kyau?
ENTP biyu yawanci suna sama da matsakaici a Son jama’a (harafin E). Son jama’a na masoyi yana da raunanniyar alaƙa da gamsuwa. Shawarar aiki: Masoya biyu masu magana kai tsaye suna buƙatar ƙa’idar da suka yarda da ita ta saɓani: ku soki takamaiman hali, ba halittar mutum ba, kuma ku dakata idan ɗayanku ya fara hasala. Ko kowannenku yana da natsuwar zuciya (harafin C/R) yana daga cikin abubuwan hasashe mafi ƙarfi da aka sani, kuma haruffa huɗu ba za su iya nuna shi ba.
Shin ENTP biyu za su iya zama abokai na kurkusa?
ENTP biyu yawanci suna sama da matsakaici a Son jama’a (harafin E). Son jama’a yana hasashen samun abokai da sauri da kuma da yawa. Shawarar aiki: Ku ci gaba da raha, amma lokaci-lokaci ku faɗi a fili abin da kuke yaba wa juna. Abokai masu magana kai tsaye sukan ɗauka cewa ɗayan ya riga ya sani.
Shin ENTP biyu suna aiki tare da kyau?
Yawanci babu ɗayan nau’o’in da yake sama a ƙwazo, mai hasashe na hali mafi daidaito ga ƙwazon aiki, don haka tsare-tsaren tare da ranakun ƙarshe suna da muhimmanci. Gaskiya da tawali’u (harafin M/A) su ne masu hasashe mafi ƙarfi a tsarin HEXACO na ƙarancin halaye masu cutarwa a wurin aiki, don haka yana da kyau a san su ma.
Game da waɗannan nau’o’i
Kuna jin daɗin mutane da ra’ayoyi daidai wa daida, kuma kuna son muhawara, tara ra’ayoyi tare da ƙalubalantar al’ada. Kuna barin hanyoyi da yawa a buɗe, kuna fara abubuwa da yawa kuma sababbin abubuwa sun fi ba ku kuzari fiye da abin da aka saba.
Sauran haɗe-haɗe
ENTP tare da: INTJINTPENTJINFJINFPENFJENFPISTJISFJESTJESFJISTPISFPESTPESFP
Majiyoyi
- Dyrenforth, P. S., Kashy, D. A., Donnellan, M. B., & Lucas, R. E. (2010). Predicting relationship and life satisfaction from personality in nationally representative samples from three countries: The relative importance of actor, partner, and similarity effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(4), 690–702.
- Malouff, J. M., Thorsteinsson, E. B., Schutte, N. S., Bhullar, N., & Rooke, S. E. (2010). The five-factor model of personality and relationship satisfaction of intimate partners: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 44(1), 124–127.
- Jensen-Campbell, L. A., & Graziano, W. G. (2001). Agreeableness as a moderator of interpersonal conflict. Journal of Personality, 69(2), 323–362.
- Schmitt, D. P. (2004). The Big Five related to risky sexual behaviour across 10 world regions: Differential personality associations of sexual promiscuity and relationship infidelity. European Journal of Personality, 18(4), 301–319.
- Selfhout, M., Burk, W., Branje, S., Denissen, J., van Aken, M., & Meeus, W. (2010). Emerging late adolescent friendship networks and Big Five personality traits: A social network approach. Journal of Personality, 78(2), 509–538.
- Harris, K., & Vazire, S. (2016). On friendship development and the Big Five personality traits. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 10(11), 647–667.
- Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44(1), 1–26.
- Karney, B. R., & Bradbury, T. N. (1995). The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: A review of theory, method, and research. Psychological Bulletin, 118(1), 3–34.
- Roberts, B. W., Walton, K. E., & Viechtbauer, W. (2006). Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 132(1), 1–25.
- Roberts, B. W., Luo, J., Briley, D. A., Chow, P. I., Su, R., & Hill, P. L. (2017). A systematic review of personality trait change through intervention. Psychological Bulletin, 143(2), 117–141.
- Hudson, N. W., & Fraley, R. C. (2015). Volitional personality trait change: Can people choose to change their personality traits? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(3), 490–507.
- Judge, T. A., Heller, D., & Mount, M. K. (2002). Five-factor model of personality and job satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 530–541.
- Thielmann, I., Spadaro, G., & Balliet, D. (2020). Personality and prosocial behavior: A theoretical framework and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 146(1), 30–90.
- Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2005). Psychopathy, Machiavellianism, and narcissism in the Five-Factor Model and the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Individual Differences, 38(7), 1571–1582.
- Pletzer, J. L., Bentvelzen, M., Oostrom, J. K., & de Vries, R. E. (2019). A meta-analysis of the relations between personality and workplace deviance: Big Five versus HEXACO. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 112, 369–383.
- Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2007). Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11(2), 150–166.
- McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1989). Reinterpreting the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator from the perspective of the five-factor model of personality. Journal of Personality, 57(1), 17–40.
- Soto, C. J. (2019). How replicable are links between personality traits and consequential life outcomes? The Life Outcomes of Personality Replication Project. Psychological Science, 30(5), 711–727.