Fara gwajin

ESFJ-CM · Mai Karɓar Baƙi · Natsattse kuma Mai Gaskiya

ESFJ-CM a abota: yadda ESFJ-CM yake samun abokai da riƙe su

ESFJ-CM yana gina abota da riƙe ta a matsayin mai son jama’a, mai aiki da zahiri, mai tausayi, mai tsari, mai natsuwa da mai tawali’u. A ƙasa: yadda hakan yake a zahiri, abin da bincike ya ce game da hali da abota, da inda saɓani zai iya tasowa da abokan da suka bambanta da ku.

Kuna da karimci, kuna son jama’a, ana iya dogara da ku kuma kuna da gaskiya. Kuna jin daɗin tara mutane wuri ɗaya da tabbatar da cewa an kula da kowa, kuma kuna daraja al’ada da aminci mai ɗorewa. Kuna kasancewa cikin natsuwa a ƙarƙashin matsi (natsuwar zuciya mai yawa) kuma kuna da tawali’u da adalci (gaskiya da tawali’u masu yawa). Sau da yawa wasu suna ganin ku a matsayin abin dogaro a lokacin wahala da kuma amintattu da nauyi.

Yadda ESFJ-CM yake a matsayin aboki

Yadda kowane harafi yakan bayyana. Waɗannan bayanin sifofin ne, ba sakamakon bincike ba.

Son jama’a
E · Mai son jama’a

Wataƙila kuna da faffaɗan da’irar mutane, kuma sau da yawa ku ne kuke ba da shawarar fita ko haɗa mutane da juna.

Buɗaɗɗen tunani
S · Mai aiki da zahiri

Ayyukan da kuke yi tare da taimaka wa juna wataƙila su ne mannen abotarku.

Sauƙin kai
F · Mai tausayi

Wataƙila abokai suna zuwa wajenku don neman goyon baya da kunne mai tausayi.

Ƙwazo
J · Mai tsari

Wataƙila ku ne kuke tunawa da ranakun haihuwa, kuke sa ranar haɗuwa kuma kuke zuwa a kan lokaci.

Natsuwar zuciya
C · Mai natsuwa

Wataƙila ku ne masu kwantar da hankali idan abokai suna cikin wani rikici.

Gaskiya da tawali’u
M · Mai tawali’u

Wataƙila kuna ɗaukar abokai a matsayin daidai da ku, kuma ku ne mutumin da ake amincewa da sirri a wajensa.

Sifofin ESFJ a abota: bincike da shawarwarin aiki

  • Masu son jama’a suna saurin samun sababbin abokai kuma a ƙarshe suna da faffaɗan da’irar abokai.[1][2]
  • Babbar hanyar sadarwa ba ta tabbatar da abota ta kurkusa ba. Ku ware lokaci kuma don haɗuwa ɗaya da ɗaya.
  • A wani bincike da ya bibiyi ɗaliban jami’a na watanni 18, hali ya fi hasashen yadda dangantakarsu ta haɓaka fiye da yadda dangantaka ta sauya hali. Son jama’a ya yi hasashen gina babbar hanyar sadarwa da sauran ɗalibai.[3]
  • Sauƙin kai yana taimakawa wajen ginawa da riƙe abota, saboda mutane suna jin aminci idan suna tare da ku.[2]
  • Idan aka sami rashin jituwa, mutane masu yawan sauƙin kai suna amfani da hanyoyi masu gina jiki kuma ba kasafai suke ƙara rura saɓani ba, wanda yake kare abota a lokuta masu wahala.[4]
  • Ku ne abokin da yake tunawa kuma yake zuwa. Kasancewa abin dogaro shi ne tushen aminci mai natsuwa.
  • Sau da yawa ana gina abotarku a kan ayyukan da kuke yi tare (wasanni, gyaran abubuwa, girki).

ESFJ-CM tare da abokai masu bambanci: abubuwan da suke kawo saɓani da mafita

Inda ku da ɗayan mutumin kuke a gefe dabam-dabam na harafi ɗaya. Shawarwarin aiki, ba sakamakon bincike ba.

Son jama’a
Tare da wanda ya fi zama mai son kaɗaici (I)

Ɗaya yana son manyan taruka, ɗayan kuma haɗuwa ku biyu kawai. Ku riƙa musanya tsakanin hanyoyin biyu.

Buɗaɗɗen tunani
Tare da wanda ya fi zama mai hasashe (N)

Ku riƙa musanya tsakanin tattauna ra’ayoyi da yin ayyuka na zahiri tare.

Sauƙin kai
Tare da wanda ya fi zama mai tsauri (T)

Ɗaya yana magana kai tsaye, ɗayan kuma yana da hankali. Zai taimaka idan wanda ya fi magana kai tsaye ya fara da abin da yake daraja.

Ƙwazo
Tare da wanda ya fi zama mai sassauci (P)

Ɗaya yana tsarawa, ɗayan kuma yana yin abu nan take. Ku bar mai tsarawa ya sa lokaci, ɗayan kuma ya zaɓi abin da za a yi.

Natsuwar zuciya
Tare da wanda ya fi zama mai saurin ji (R)

Abokin da ya fi natsuwa yakan zama ginshiƙin dogaro. Ku tabbatar cewa taimako yana tafiya ta ɓangarorin biyu.

Gaskiya da tawali’u
Tare da wanda ya fi zama mai buri (A)

Ɗaya yana neman matsayi, ɗayan kuma mai tawali’u ne. Kada ku bar abota ta koma kan kwatanta kai.

Abin da haruffan -CM suke ƙara wa ESFJ a abota

C = Mai natsuwa (natsuwar zuciya), M = Mai tawali’u (gaskiya da tawali’u). Gwajin gargajiya na haruffa huɗu ba ya auna ko ɗaya daga cikinsu, amma duka biyu suna da muhimmanci a abota:

  • Sau da yawa abokai suna dogara da ku a lokacin wahala. Ku tabbatar cewa taimako yana tafiya ta ɓangarorin biyu.
  • Mutane suna amincewa da ku da sirrinsu kuma suna dogara da adalcinku, mabuɗin abota ta kurkusa.
  • Gaskiya da tawali’u suna hasashen halin adalci da haɗin kai inda ake buƙatar aminci, wato irin dogaron da abota take tafiya a kai.[5]

Yaya ƙarfin waɗannan sakamako yake?

  • Haruffa huɗu na gargajiya suna daidai da huɗu daga cikin sifofin Big Five (son jama’a, buɗaɗɗen tunani, sauƙin kai, ƙwazo), shi ya sa binciken Big Five ya shafe su.[6]
  • Alaƙoƙin da ke tsakanin sifofi da sakamako gaskiya ne amma kowanne ƙarami ne: alaƙar da aka saba gani tana kusan 0.10 zuwa 0.30, don haka sifofi suna sauya yiwuwa ne maimakon su yanke sakamako. Wani babban aikin maimaita bincike ya tabbatar da yawancin alaƙoƙin da aka gwada, yawanci da tasiri ɗan ƙasa.[7][8]

Layukan da ba su da majiya shawarwarin aiki ne ko bayanin sifofi, ba sakamakon bincike ba.

Shin ku ESFJ-CM ne da gaske?

Gwajin kyauta yana auna dukkan sifofi shida a matsayin percentile. Tambayoyi 62, kusan minti 8, ba rajista.

Ku yi gwajin kyauta

Kuna da sakamako tuni? Ku kwatanta da aboki.

Shafukan da suka shafi wannan

Majiyoyi

  1. Selfhout, M., Burk, W., Branje, S., Denissen, J., van Aken, M., & Meeus, W. (2010). Emerging late adolescent friendship networks and Big Five personality traits: A social network approach. Journal of Personality, 78(2), 509–538.
  2. Harris, K., & Vazire, S. (2016). On friendship development and the Big Five personality traits. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 10(11), 647–667.
  3. Asendorpf, J. B., & Wilpers, S. (1998). Personality effects on social relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1531–1544.
  4. Jensen-Campbell, L. A., & Graziano, W. G. (2001). Agreeableness as a moderator of interpersonal conflict. Journal of Personality, 69(2), 323–362.
  5. Thielmann, I., Spadaro, G., & Balliet, D. (2020). Personality and prosocial behavior: A theoretical framework and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 146(1), 30–90.
  6. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1989). Reinterpreting the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator from the perspective of the five-factor model of personality. Journal of Personality, 57(1), 17–40.
  7. Soto, C. J. (2019). How replicable are links between personality traits and consequential life outcomes? The Life Outcomes of Personality Replication Project. Psychological Science, 30(5), 711–727.
  8. Ozer, D. J., & Benet-Martínez, V. (2006). Personality and the prediction of consequential outcomes. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 401–421.