ESTJ-RM · Mai Tsarawa · Mai Saurin Ji kuma Mai Gaskiya
ESTJ-RM a abota: yadda ESTJ-RM yake samun abokai da riƙe su
ESTJ-RM yana gina abota da riƙe ta a matsayin mai son jama’a, mai aiki da zahiri, mai tsauri, mai tsari, mai saurin ji da mai tawali’u. A ƙasa: yadda hakan yake a zahiri, abin da bincike ya ce game da hali da abota, da inda saɓani zai iya tasowa da abokan da suka bambanta da ku.
Kuna son jama’a, ƙafafunku suna ƙasa, kuna magana kai tsaye kuma kuna son tsari. Kuna son tafiyar da abubuwa cikin inganci, kafa bayyanannun buri da tabbatar da cewa mutane sun cika su. Kuna jin motsin rai da ƙarfi kuma kuna saurin lura da damuwa (natsuwar zuciya ƙarama), kuma kuna da tawali’u da adalci (gaskiya da tawali’u masu yawa). Kuna damuwa da yin abin da yake daidai, wani lokaci har ku yi ta tunani a kansa.
Yadda ESTJ-RM yake a matsayin aboki
Yadda kowane harafi yakan bayyana. Waɗannan bayanin sifofin ne, ba sakamakon bincike ba.
Wataƙila kuna da faffaɗan da’irar mutane, kuma sau da yawa ku ne kuke ba da shawarar fita ko haɗa mutane da juna.
Ayyukan da kuke yi tare da taimaka wa juna wataƙila su ne mannen abotarku.
Wataƙila ku ne abokin da yake faɗin abin da wasu suke tunani, kuma kuna daraja abokan da za su iya jure gaskiya.
Wataƙila ku ne kuke tunawa da ranakun haihuwa, kuke sa ranar haɗuwa kuma kuke zuwa a kan lokaci.
Wataƙila kuna lura da yanayin zuciyar abokai, kuma wataƙila kuna sake tunanin hirarraki bayan sun wuce kuna mamakin yadda suka kasance.
Wataƙila kuna ɗaukar abokai a matsayin daidai da ku, kuma ku ne mutumin da ake amincewa da sirri a wajensa.
Sifofin ESTJ a abota: bincike da shawarwarin aiki
- Masu son jama’a suna saurin samun sababbin abokai kuma a ƙarshe suna da faffaɗan da’irar abokai.[1][2]
- Babbar hanyar sadarwa ba ta tabbatar da abota ta kurkusa ba. Ku ware lokaci kuma don haɗuwa ɗaya da ɗaya.
- A wani bincike da ya bibiyi ɗaliban jami’a na watanni 18, hali ya fi hasashen yadda dangantakarsu ta haɓaka fiye da yadda dangantaka ta sauya hali. Son jama’a ya yi hasashen gina babbar hanyar sadarwa da sauran ɗalibai.[3]
- Abokan da suke daraja gaskiya za su daraja ku. Wasu kuma wataƙila za su buƙaci ku sassauta yadda kuke faɗin abu.
- Ƙarancin sauƙin kai yana hasashen hanyoyi masu ɓarna a rikici tsakanin mutane, don haka yadda kuke nuna rashin yarda ya fi muhimmanci fiye da ko kun ƙi yarda.[4]
- Ku ne abokin da yake tunawa kuma yake zuwa. Kasancewa abin dogaro shi ne tushen aminci mai natsuwa.
- Sau da yawa ana gina abotarku a kan ayyukan da kuke yi tare (wasanni, gyaran abubuwa, girki).
ESTJ-RM tare da abokai masu bambanci: abubuwan da suke kawo saɓani da mafita
Inda ku da ɗayan mutumin kuke a gefe dabam-dabam na harafi ɗaya. Shawarwarin aiki, ba sakamakon bincike ba.
Ɗaya yana son manyan taruka, ɗayan kuma haɗuwa ku biyu kawai. Ku riƙa musanya tsakanin hanyoyin biyu.
Ku riƙa musanya tsakanin tattauna ra’ayoyi da yin ayyuka na zahiri tare.
Ɗaya yana magana kai tsaye, ɗayan kuma yana da hankali. Zai taimaka idan wanda ya fi magana kai tsaye ya fara da abin da yake daraja.
Ɗaya yana tsarawa, ɗayan kuma yana yin abu nan take. Ku bar mai tsarawa ya sa lokaci, ɗayan kuma ya zaɓi abin da za a yi.
Abokin da ya fi natsuwa yakan zama ginshiƙin dogaro. Ku tabbatar cewa taimako yana tafiya ta ɓangarorin biyu.
Ɗaya yana neman matsayi, ɗayan kuma mai tawali’u ne. Kada ku bar abota ta koma kan kwatanta kai.
Yadda sifofin ESTJ-RM suke haɗuwa
Bayanan haɗe-haɗe suna sa sakamakon bincike dabam-dabam gefe da gefe. Ba bincike ne dabam a kan wannan nau’i kansa ba.
- Mutane suna ba ku kuzari, amma kuna saurin jin abubuwa a rai, don haka wataƙila kuna neman mutane idan kuna cikin damuwa. Ku zaɓi mutanen da suke kwantar muku da hankali, ba waɗanda suke ƙara muku fargaba ba.
- Mai magana kai tsaye amma mai adalci: kuna iya zama mai tsauri kuma a lokaci guda mai manyan ƙa’idojin ɗabi’a. Waɗanda suka san ku suna amincewa da ku, amma baƙi wataƙila za su ga tsaurin kawai.[5]
Abin da haruffan -RM suke ƙara wa ESTJ a abota
R = Mai saurin ji (natsuwar zuciya), M = Mai tawali’u (gaskiya da tawali’u). Gwajin gargajiya na haruffa huɗu ba ya auna ko ɗaya daga cikinsu, amma duka biyu suna da muhimmanci a abota:
- Sau da yawa kuna lura idan abokai suna cikin wahala. Ku zaɓi abokan da su ma za su iya karɓar yadda kuke ji.
- Mutane suna amincewa da ku da sirrinsu kuma suna dogara da adalcinku, mabuɗin abota ta kurkusa.
- Gaskiya da tawali’u suna hasashen halin adalci da haɗin kai inda ake buƙatar aminci, wato irin dogaron da abota take tafiya a kai.[6]
Yaya ƙarfin waɗannan sakamako yake?
- Haruffa huɗu na gargajiya suna daidai da huɗu daga cikin sifofin Big Five (son jama’a, buɗaɗɗen tunani, sauƙin kai, ƙwazo), shi ya sa binciken Big Five ya shafe su.[7]
- Alaƙoƙin da ke tsakanin sifofi da sakamako gaskiya ne amma kowanne ƙarami ne: alaƙar da aka saba gani tana kusan 0.10 zuwa 0.30, don haka sifofi suna sauya yiwuwa ne maimakon su yanke sakamako. Wani babban aikin maimaita bincike ya tabbatar da yawancin alaƙoƙin da aka gwada, yawanci da tasiri ɗan ƙasa.[8][9]
Layukan da ba su da majiya shawarwarin aiki ne ko bayanin sifofi, ba sakamakon bincike ba.
Gwajin kyauta yana auna dukkan sifofi shida a matsayin percentile. Tambayoyi 62, kusan minti 8, ba rajista.
Ku yi gwajin kyautaKuna da sakamako tuni? Ku kwatanta da aboki.
Shafukan da suka shafi wannan
Majiyoyi
- Selfhout, M., Burk, W., Branje, S., Denissen, J., van Aken, M., & Meeus, W. (2010). Emerging late adolescent friendship networks and Big Five personality traits: A social network approach. Journal of Personality, 78(2), 509–538.
- Harris, K., & Vazire, S. (2016). On friendship development and the Big Five personality traits. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 10(11), 647–667.
- Asendorpf, J. B., & Wilpers, S. (1998). Personality effects on social relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1531–1544.
- Jensen-Campbell, L. A., & Graziano, W. G. (2001). Agreeableness as a moderator of interpersonal conflict. Journal of Personality, 69(2), 323–362.
- Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2007). Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11(2), 150–166.
- Thielmann, I., Spadaro, G., & Balliet, D. (2020). Personality and prosocial behavior: A theoretical framework and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 146(1), 30–90.
- McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1989). Reinterpreting the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator from the perspective of the five-factor model of personality. Journal of Personality, 57(1), 17–40.
- Soto, C. J. (2019). How replicable are links between personality traits and consequential life outcomes? The Life Outcomes of Personality Replication Project. Psychological Science, 30(5), 711–727.
- Ozer, D. J., & Benet-Martínez, V. (2006). Personality and the prediction of consequential outcomes. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 401–421.