INTJ-RM · Mai Dabara · Mai Saurin Ji kuma Mai Gaskiya
INTJ-RM a abota: yadda INTJ-RM yake samun abokai da riƙe su
INTJ-RM yana gina abota da riƙe ta a matsayin mai son kaɗaici, mai hasashe, mai tsauri, mai tsari, mai saurin ji da mai tawali’u. A ƙasa: yadda hakan yake a zahiri, abin da bincike ya ce game da hali da abota, da inda saɓani zai iya tasowa da abokan da suka bambanta da ku.
Kuna haɗa son ra’ayoyi da ladabin aiki tare da salo kai tsaye mai cin gashin kai. Kun fi son warware matsaloli ku kaɗai ko tare da ’yan mutanen da kuka amince da su, kuma kuna ɗora wa kanku da wasu manyan ma’auni. Kuna jin motsin rai da ƙarfi kuma kuna saurin lura da damuwa (natsuwar zuciya ƙarama), kuma kuna da tawali’u da adalci (gaskiya da tawali’u masu yawa). Kuna damuwa da yin abin da yake daidai, wani lokaci har ku yi ta tunani a kansa.
Yadda INTJ-RM yake a matsayin aboki
Yadda kowane harafi yakan bayyana. Waɗannan bayanin sifofin ne, ba sakamakon bincike ba.
Wataƙila kun fi son ’yan abokai na kurkusa fiye da babbar da’ira, da zurfin hira fiye da yawan haɗuwa.
Hirarrakin da suke shiga cikin ra’ayoyi, littattafai, ka’idoji ko tsare-tsare wataƙila su ne abin da kuka fi daraja a wajen abokai.
Wataƙila ku ne abokin da yake faɗin abin da wasu suke tunani, kuma kuna daraja abokan da za su iya jure gaskiya.
Wataƙila ku ne kuke tunawa da ranakun haihuwa, kuke sa ranar haɗuwa kuma kuke zuwa a kan lokaci.
Wataƙila kuna lura da yanayin zuciyar abokai, kuma wataƙila kuna sake tunanin hirarraki bayan sun wuce kuna mamakin yadda suka kasance.
Wataƙila kuna ɗaukar abokai a matsayin daidai da ku, kuma ku ne mutumin da ake amincewa da sirri a wajensa.
Sifofin INTJ a abota: bincike da shawarwarin aiki
- Wataƙila kuna samun abokai a hankali. Son jama’a ya fi hasashen yawan abokan da za ku samu fiye da yadda abotar take kurkusa.[1][2]
- Haɗuwa masu natsuwa akai-akai (yawo na kowane mako, kira a wata rana ta musamman) suna gina kusanci ba tare da gajiyar da ku ba.
- A wani bincike da ya bibiyi ɗaliban jami’a na watanni 18, son jama’a ya yi hasashen gina babbar hanyar sadarwa da sauran ɗalibai. Girman da’ira ba ɗaya yake da kusanci ba, don haka ƙaramar da’ira ba nakasu ba ce.[3][2]
- Abokan da suke daraja gaskiya za su daraja ku. Wasu kuma wataƙila za su buƙaci ku sassauta yadda kuke faɗin abu.
- Ƙarancin sauƙin kai yana hasashen hanyoyi masu ɓarna a rikici tsakanin mutane, don haka yadda kuke nuna rashin yarda ya fi muhimmanci fiye da ko kun ƙi yarda.[4]
- Ku ne abokin da yake tunawa kuma yake zuwa. Kasancewa abin dogaro shi ne tushen aminci mai natsuwa.
- Kuna samun kuzari daga abokan da za ku iya musayar ra’ayoyi, littattafai da sababbin abubuwa da su.
INTJ-RM tare da abokai masu bambanci: abubuwan da suke kawo saɓani da mafita
Inda ku da ɗayan mutumin kuke a gefe dabam-dabam na harafi ɗaya. Shawarwarin aiki, ba sakamakon bincike ba.
Ɗaya yana son manyan taruka, ɗayan kuma haɗuwa ku biyu kawai. Ku riƙa musanya tsakanin hanyoyin biyu.
Ku riƙa musanya tsakanin tattauna ra’ayoyi da yin ayyuka na zahiri tare.
Ɗaya yana magana kai tsaye, ɗayan kuma yana da hankali. Zai taimaka idan wanda ya fi magana kai tsaye ya fara da abin da yake daraja.
Ɗaya yana tsarawa, ɗayan kuma yana yin abu nan take. Ku bar mai tsarawa ya sa lokaci, ɗayan kuma ya zaɓi abin da za a yi.
Abokin da ya fi natsuwa yakan zama ginshiƙin dogaro. Ku tabbatar cewa taimako yana tafiya ta ɓangarorin biyu.
Ɗaya yana neman matsayi, ɗayan kuma mai tawali’u ne. Kada ku bar abota ta koma kan kwatanta kai.
Yadda sifofin INTJ-RM suke haɗuwa
Bayanan haɗe-haɗe suna sa sakamakon bincike dabam-dabam gefe da gefe. Ba bincike ne dabam a kan wannan nau’i kansa ba.
- Son kaɗaici da saurin ji sifofi ne dabam-dabam, amma idan suka haɗu damuwa za ta iya keɓe ku. Ku yi tunani tun da wuri kan hanyoyi masu sauƙi na neman taimako, kafin ku buƙace shi.[5]
- Mai magana kai tsaye amma mai adalci: kuna iya zama mai tsauri kuma a lokaci guda mai manyan ƙa’idojin ɗabi’a. Waɗanda suka san ku suna amincewa da ku, amma baƙi wataƙila za su ga tsaurin kawai.[6]
Abin da haruffan -RM suke ƙara wa INTJ a abota
R = Mai saurin ji (natsuwar zuciya), M = Mai tawali’u (gaskiya da tawali’u). Gwajin gargajiya na haruffa huɗu ba ya auna ko ɗaya daga cikinsu, amma duka biyu suna da muhimmanci a abota:
- Sau da yawa kuna lura idan abokai suna cikin wahala. Ku zaɓi abokan da su ma za su iya karɓar yadda kuke ji.
- Mutane suna amincewa da ku da sirrinsu kuma suna dogara da adalcinku, mabuɗin abota ta kurkusa.
- Gaskiya da tawali’u suna hasashen halin adalci da haɗin kai inda ake buƙatar aminci, wato irin dogaron da abota take tafiya a kai.[7]
Yaya ƙarfin waɗannan sakamako yake?
- Haruffa huɗu na gargajiya suna daidai da huɗu daga cikin sifofin Big Five (son jama’a, buɗaɗɗen tunani, sauƙin kai, ƙwazo), shi ya sa binciken Big Five ya shafe su.[8]
- Alaƙoƙin da ke tsakanin sifofi da sakamako gaskiya ne amma kowanne ƙarami ne: alaƙar da aka saba gani tana kusan 0.10 zuwa 0.30, don haka sifofi suna sauya yiwuwa ne maimakon su yanke sakamako. Wani babban aikin maimaita bincike ya tabbatar da yawancin alaƙoƙin da aka gwada, yawanci da tasiri ɗan ƙasa.[9][10]
Layukan da ba su da majiya shawarwarin aiki ne ko bayanin sifofi, ba sakamakon bincike ba.
Gwajin kyauta yana auna dukkan sifofi shida a matsayin percentile. Tambayoyi 62, kusan minti 8, ba rajista.
Ku yi gwajin kyautaKuna da sakamako tuni? Ku kwatanta da aboki.
Shafukan da suka shafi wannan
Majiyoyi
- Selfhout, M., Burk, W., Branje, S., Denissen, J., van Aken, M., & Meeus, W. (2010). Emerging late adolescent friendship networks and Big Five personality traits: A social network approach. Journal of Personality, 78(2), 509–538.
- Harris, K., & Vazire, S. (2016). On friendship development and the Big Five personality traits. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 10(11), 647–667.
- Asendorpf, J. B., & Wilpers, S. (1998). Personality effects on social relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1531–1544.
- Jensen-Campbell, L. A., & Graziano, W. G. (2001). Agreeableness as a moderator of interpersonal conflict. Journal of Personality, 69(2), 323–362.
- Kotov, R., Gamez, W., Schmidt, F., & Watson, D. (2010). Linking "big" personality traits to anxiety, depressive, and substance use disorders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136(5), 768–821.
- Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2007). Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11(2), 150–166.
- Thielmann, I., Spadaro, G., & Balliet, D. (2020). Personality and prosocial behavior: A theoretical framework and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 146(1), 30–90.
- McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1989). Reinterpreting the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator from the perspective of the five-factor model of personality. Journal of Personality, 57(1), 17–40.
- Soto, C. J. (2019). How replicable are links between personality traits and consequential life outcomes? The Life Outcomes of Personality Replication Project. Psychological Science, 30(5), 711–727.
- Ozer, D. J., & Benet-Martínez, V. (2006). Personality and the prediction of consequential outcomes. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 401–421.