ENFJ-CA · Mai Ba da Shawara · Natsattse kuma Mai Fafutuka
ENFJ-CA a abota: yadda ENFJ-CA yake samun abokai da riƙe su
ENFJ-CA yana gina abota da riƙe ta a matsayin mai son jama’a, mai hasashe, mai tausayi, mai tsari, mai natsuwa da mai buri. A ƙasa: yadda hakan yake a zahiri, abin da bincike ya ce game da hali da abota, da inda saɓani zai iya tasowa da abokan da suka bambanta da ku.
Kuna son jama’a, kuna da tausayi, kuna son bincike kuma ana iya dogara da ku, haɗin da ya dace wajen tara mutane a kan wani ra’ayi. Sau da yawa ku ne kuke ɗaukar nauyin kiyaye jituwar ƙungiya da tabbatar da cewa an kammala abubuwa. Kuna kasancewa cikin natsuwa a ƙarƙashin matsi (natsuwar zuciya mai yawa) kuma matsayi, nasara da karɓuwa suna motsa ku (gaskiya da tawali’u ƙanana). Wannan yanayi ne na amincewa da kai da son gasa. Babban haɗarinsa yana kan aminci na dogon lokaci.
Yadda ENFJ-CA yake a matsayin aboki
Yadda kowane harafi yakan bayyana. Waɗannan bayanin sifofin ne, ba sakamakon bincike ba.
Wataƙila kuna da faffaɗan da’irar mutane, kuma sau da yawa ku ne kuke ba da shawarar fita ko haɗa mutane da juna.
Hirarrakin da suke shiga cikin ra’ayoyi, littattafai, ka’idoji ko tsare-tsare wataƙila su ne abin da kuka fi daraja a wajen abokai.
Wataƙila abokai suna zuwa wajenku don neman goyon baya da kunne mai tausayi.
Wataƙila ku ne kuke tunawa da ranakun haihuwa, kuke sa ranar haɗuwa kuma kuke zuwa a kan lokaci.
Wataƙila ku ne masu kwantar da hankali idan abokai suna cikin wani rikici.
Wataƙila zama da ku yana ba da kuzari da ƙwarin gwiwa, kuma kuna da ƙwarewa wajen gina hanyoyin sadarwa masu amfani.
Sifofin ENFJ a abota: bincike da shawarwarin aiki
- Masu son jama’a suna saurin samun sababbin abokai kuma a ƙarshe suna da faffaɗan da’irar abokai.[1][2]
- Babbar hanyar sadarwa ba ta tabbatar da abota ta kurkusa ba. Ku ware lokaci kuma don haɗuwa ɗaya da ɗaya.
- A wani bincike da ya bibiyi ɗaliban jami’a na watanni 18, hali ya fi hasashen yadda dangantakarsu ta haɓaka fiye da yadda dangantaka ta sauya hali. Son jama’a ya yi hasashen gina babbar hanyar sadarwa da sauran ɗalibai.[3]
- Sauƙin kai yana taimakawa wajen ginawa da riƙe abota, saboda mutane suna jin aminci idan suna tare da ku.[2]
- Idan aka sami rashin jituwa, mutane masu yawan sauƙin kai suna amfani da hanyoyi masu gina jiki kuma ba kasafai suke ƙara rura saɓani ba, wanda yake kare abota a lokuta masu wahala.[4]
- Ku ne abokin da yake tunawa kuma yake zuwa. Kasancewa abin dogaro shi ne tushen aminci mai natsuwa.
- Kuna samun kuzari daga abokan da za ku iya musayar ra’ayoyi, littattafai da sababbin abubuwa da su.
ENFJ-CA tare da abokai masu bambanci: abubuwan da suke kawo saɓani da mafita
Inda ku da ɗayan mutumin kuke a gefe dabam-dabam na harafi ɗaya. Shawarwarin aiki, ba sakamakon bincike ba.
Ɗaya yana son manyan taruka, ɗayan kuma haɗuwa ku biyu kawai. Ku riƙa musanya tsakanin hanyoyin biyu.
Ku riƙa musanya tsakanin tattauna ra’ayoyi da yin ayyuka na zahiri tare.
Ɗaya yana magana kai tsaye, ɗayan kuma yana da hankali. Zai taimaka idan wanda ya fi magana kai tsaye ya fara da abin da yake daraja.
Ɗaya yana tsarawa, ɗayan kuma yana yin abu nan take. Ku bar mai tsarawa ya sa lokaci, ɗayan kuma ya zaɓi abin da za a yi.
Abokin da ya fi natsuwa yakan zama ginshiƙin dogaro. Ku tabbatar cewa taimako yana tafiya ta ɓangarorin biyu.
Ɗaya yana neman matsayi, ɗayan kuma mai tawali’u ne. Kada ku bar abota ta koma kan kwatanta kai.
Yadda sifofin ENFJ-CA suke haɗuwa
Bayanan haɗe-haɗe suna sa sakamakon bincike dabam-dabam gefe da gefe. Ba bincike ne dabam a kan wannan nau’i kansa ba.
- Mai karimci amma mai neman matsayi: tsarin HEXACO yana bambanta sauƙin kai (kirki) da gaskiya da tawali’u (gaskiya da adalci). Idan ana ganin nuna abin da ba haka yake ba, mutane za su iya jin cewa karimcinku na lissafi ne.[5]
Abin da haruffan -CA suke ƙara wa ENFJ a abota
C = Mai natsuwa (natsuwar zuciya), A = Mai buri (gaskiya da tawali’u). Gwajin gargajiya na haruffa huɗu ba ya auna ko ɗaya daga cikinsu, amma duka biyu suna da muhimmanci a abota:
- Sau da yawa abokai suna dogara da ku a lokacin wahala. Ku tabbatar cewa taimako yana tafiya ta ɓangarorin biyu.
- Zama da ku yana da daɗi kuma kuna ƙarfafa gwiwa. Ku tabbatar abokanku suna jin kuna daraja su don yadda suke, ba don abin da za su iya ba ku ba.
- A matsakaici, mutanen da suke da ƙarancin gaskiya da tawali’u ba sa yawan haɗa kai a wasannin tattalin arziki da suka dogara da aminci. A abota, adalcin da ake gani (raba kuɗaɗe, mayar da alheri) yana daidaita hakan.[6]
Yaya ƙarfin waɗannan sakamako yake?
- Haruffa huɗu na gargajiya suna daidai da huɗu daga cikin sifofin Big Five (son jama’a, buɗaɗɗen tunani, sauƙin kai, ƙwazo), shi ya sa binciken Big Five ya shafe su.[7]
- Alaƙoƙin da ke tsakanin sifofi da sakamako gaskiya ne amma kowanne ƙarami ne: alaƙar da aka saba gani tana kusan 0.10 zuwa 0.30, don haka sifofi suna sauya yiwuwa ne maimakon su yanke sakamako. Wani babban aikin maimaita bincike ya tabbatar da yawancin alaƙoƙin da aka gwada, yawanci da tasiri ɗan ƙasa.[8][9]
Layukan da ba su da majiya shawarwarin aiki ne ko bayanin sifofi, ba sakamakon bincike ba.
Gwajin kyauta yana auna dukkan sifofi shida a matsayin percentile. Tambayoyi 62, kusan minti 8, ba rajista.
Ku yi gwajin kyautaKuna da sakamako tuni? Ku kwatanta da aboki.
Shafukan da suka shafi wannan
Majiyoyi
- Selfhout, M., Burk, W., Branje, S., Denissen, J., van Aken, M., & Meeus, W. (2010). Emerging late adolescent friendship networks and Big Five personality traits: A social network approach. Journal of Personality, 78(2), 509–538.
- Harris, K., & Vazire, S. (2016). On friendship development and the Big Five personality traits. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 10(11), 647–667.
- Asendorpf, J. B., & Wilpers, S. (1998). Personality effects on social relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1531–1544.
- Jensen-Campbell, L. A., & Graziano, W. G. (2001). Agreeableness as a moderator of interpersonal conflict. Journal of Personality, 69(2), 323–362.
- Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2007). Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11(2), 150–166.
- Thielmann, I., Spadaro, G., & Balliet, D. (2020). Personality and prosocial behavior: A theoretical framework and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 146(1), 30–90.
- McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1989). Reinterpreting the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator from the perspective of the five-factor model of personality. Journal of Personality, 57(1), 17–40.
- Soto, C. J. (2019). How replicable are links between personality traits and consequential life outcomes? The Life Outcomes of Personality Replication Project. Psychological Science, 30(5), 711–727.
- Ozer, D. J., & Benet-Martínez, V. (2006). Personality and the prediction of consequential outcomes. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 401–421.