ENFJ-CA · Mai Ba da Shawara · Natsattse kuma Mai Fafutuka
Ƙarfi da raunin ENFJ-CA: damuwa da ci gaban kai
A taƙaice, ENFJ-CA: mai son jama’a, mai bayyana ra’ayi, mai manufa, mai tsari, kuma a ƙarin sifofi biyu, mai natsuwa da mai buri. A ƙasa: inda ENFJ-CA yakan yi fice, inda yakan yi tuntuɓe, yadda yake jure damuwa, da abin da bincike ya ce game da sauyin sifofi a tsawon lokaci.
Kuna son jama’a, kuna da tausayi, kuna son bincike kuma ana iya dogara da ku, haɗin da ya dace wajen tara mutane a kan wani ra’ayi. Sau da yawa ku ne kuke ɗaukar nauyin kiyaye jituwar ƙungiya da tabbatar da cewa an kammala abubuwa. Kuna kasancewa cikin natsuwa a ƙarƙashin matsi (natsuwar zuciya mai yawa) kuma matsayi, nasara da karɓuwa suna motsa ku (gaskiya da tawali’u ƙanana). Wannan yanayi ne na amincewa da kai da son gasa. Babban haɗarinsa yana kan aminci na dogon lokaci.
Bayanin ENFJ-CA, harafi bayan harafi
Yadda kowane harafi yakan bayyana. Waɗannan bayanin sifofin ne, ba sakamakon bincike ba.
Kuzarin zamantakewa babbar dukiya ce. Haɗarinsa shi ne rufe muryoyin masu shiru, har da lokacinku na yin tunani.
Son bincike yana sa koyo ya yi muku sauƙi. Ƙalubalen shi ne ku tsaya da ra’ayi har ya ratsa tsakiyarsa mara armashi.
Kirki yana gina aminci da sauri. Ƙalubalen shi ne ku faɗi buƙatunku kafin ɓacin rai ya taru.
Horon kai yana sa a kammala abubuwa. Ƙalubalen shi ne ku kasance masu sassauci idan tsare-tsare suka zama dole a sauya su.
Natsuwa dukiya ce. Ƙalubalen shi ne lura da damuwar da wasu suke ciki, kuma lokaci-lokaci a kanku ma, wadda ba ku jin ta da ƙarfi.
Himma tana kawo sakamako. Ƙalubalen shi ne kare amincin da nasara ta dogon lokaci take dogara da shi.
Ƙarfin ENFJ-CA
- Daga cikin sifofin hali, ƙwazo shi ne mai hasashen ƙwazon aiki mafi daidaito a dukkan rukunonin ayyukan da aka bincika.[1]
- A makarantar sakandare da jami’a, yana da alaƙa da makin karatu da ƙarfi kamar basira.[2]
- A matsakaici, mutane masu yawan ƙwazo suna rayuwa tsawon lokaci, wani ɓangare saboda kyawawan halaye na lafiya.[3][4]
- Son jama’a ita ce sifar da ta fi daidaito wajen alaƙa da wanda yake fitowa a matsayin shugaba a cikin ƙungiyoyi.[5]
- A matsakaici, masu son jama’a suna ba da rahoton ƙarin jin daɗin rai.[6]
- Kuna saurin gina hanyar sadarwa da mutane, wanda yake taimakawa ga damammakin da suke zuwa ta hanyar shawarwarin mutane.
- Mutane masu yawan sauƙin kai suna amfani da hanyoyi masu gina jiki a rikici, kuma ba kasafai suke ƙara rura shi ba.[7]
- Ana yawan zaɓar mutane masu yawan sauƙin kai a matsayin abokai.[8]
- Buɗaɗɗen tunani yana da alaƙa mai daidaito da nasarar ƙirƙira, a fasaha da kuma a kimiyya.[9]
- Buɗaɗɗen tunani yana hasashen nasara a horo, wato koyo yayin aiki.[1]
Rauni da wuraren makanta na ENFJ-CA
- Manyan ma’auni za su iya zama taurin kai idan tsare-tsare suka canza. Ku bar sarari a jadawalinku.
- A wani bincike na fili, manajoji masu son jama’a sun sami sakamako mafi rauni wajen jagorantar ƙungiyoyi masu ƙwazo, saboda ba su buɗe kunne sosai ga ra’ayoyin ’yan ƙungiya ba.[10]
- A wani binciken sayarwa, mutane masu matsakaicin son jama’a (“ambiverts”) sun fi sayarwa fiye da masu tsananin son jama’a, waɗanda wataƙila an ga kamar suna tilastawa.[11]
- Sauƙin kai yana da alaƙa ta kishiyar juna da samun kuɗi, kuma tasirin ya fi girma a wajen maza.[12]
- Wataƙila kuna ganin yana da wuya ku ce a’a ko ku tsaya daram a tattaunawar ciniki. Ku shirya abin da kuke so ku nema tun da wuri.
- Kuna iya rasa sha’awa idan abu ya zama na yau da kullum. Ku tsara matakin kula da ayyuka tun da wuri.
Yadda sifofin ENFJ-CA suke haɗuwa
Bayanan haɗe-haɗe suna sa sakamakon bincike dabam-dabam gefe da gefe. Ba bincike ne dabam a kan wannan nau’i kansa ba.
Abin da haruffan -CA suke ƙara wa ENFJ a ƙarfi da rauni
C = Mai natsuwa (natsuwar zuciya), A = Mai buri (gaskiya da tawali’u). Gwajin gargajiya na haruffa huɗu ba ya auna ko ɗaya daga cikinsu, amma duka biyu suna da muhimmanci a damuwa da ci gaba:
- Natsuwar zuciya (ƙarancin saurin damuwa) ita ce alaƙa mafi ƙarfi tsakanin hali da gamsuwa da aiki.[13]
- Ƙarancin saurin damuwa yana da alaƙa da ƙaramin haɗarin cututtukan fargaba da baƙin ciki mai tsanani (depression).[14]
- Natsuwar zuciya tana da kyakkyawar alaƙa da shugabanci.[5]
- Saboda yana da wuya a girgiza ku, wataƙila kuna yin watsi da damuwar wasu. Ya fi kyau ku tambaya maimakon ku yi zato.
- Ci gaba yana ba ku ƙwarin gwiwa, kuma ba ku da takura a gasa, tallata kai da sakamakon da ake iya gani.
- Abubuwan da suke motsa ku kamar matsayi da kuɗi (waɗanda bisa ma’ana suna cikin wannan sifa) sun dace da abubuwan ƙarfafawa kamar kamashon, hannun jari a kamfani ko hanyar hawa matakin gudanarwa.
- Ƙarancin gaskiya da tawali’u yana haɗuwa sosai da “dark triad” (Machiavellianism, narcissism, psychopathy).[15]
- Ita ce sifa a tsarin HEXACO da ta fi alaƙa mai ƙarfi da halaye masu cutarwa a wurin aiki.[16]
- Mutanen da suke ƙasa a wannan sifa ba sa yawan haɗa kai a wasannin tattalin arziki da suka dogara da aminci. Abin da ake rasawa shi ne kyakkyawan suna da aminci na dogon lokaci.[17]
ENFJ-CA a ƙarƙashin damuwa: walwala da jure damuwa
- Natsuwar zuciya tana daga cikin abubuwan hali mafi ƙarfi wajen hasashen walwala.[18]
- Mutanen da suke da ƙarancin saurin damuwa ba sa yawan janyewa ko dogara da fatan banza idan suna cikin damuwa.[19]
- Son jama’a yana daga cikin alaƙoƙi mafi ƙarfi tsakanin hali da jin daɗin rai da gamsuwa da rayuwa.[18]
- Son jama’a yana da alaƙa da jure damuwa ta hanyar warware matsaloli da sake kallon yanayi ta fuska mafi kyau.[19]
- Ƙwazo yana da kyakkyawar alaƙa da gamsuwa da rayuwa.[18]
- Ƙwazo yana da alaƙa da jure damuwa ta hanyar warware matsaloli da ƙarancin guje wa abubuwa.[19]
- Sauƙin kai yana da matsakaiciyar alaƙa da walwala.[18]
- Gaskiya da tawali’u suna da alaƙa da sakamako da yawa masu amfani ga al’umma. Dangantakar da aka gina a kan adalci daga ɓangarorin biyu tana ƙara ɗorewa.[20]
- Buɗaɗɗen tunani yana da raunanniyar alaƙa ne kawai da gamsuwa da rayuwa gabaɗaya.[18]
Shawarwarin ci gaban kai ga ENFJ-CA
- Ku saba da yin tambayoyi kafin ku faɗi ra’ayinku. Wannan yana taimakawa musamman a ƙungiyoyi masu ƙwazo.[10]
- Ku haɗa ƙirƙirar ra’ayoyi da ranar ƙarshe ko da wanda zai taimaka muku ku kammala.
- Ku ɗauki tsayawa kan matsayinku a matsayin ƙwarewa. Kirki da faɗin abin da kuke buƙata a fili suna tafiya tare sosai.
- Ku tsara da gangan lokacin da babu wani shiri a cikinsa. Sassauci ma ƙwarewa ce.
- Ku saba da faɗin yadda kuke ji a fili. Wasu za su iya ɗauka cewa natsuwarku sanyin rai ne.
- Ku zaɓi fanni ɗaya da za ku kasance cikakken mai bayyana gaskiya. Da lokaci, wannan yakan zama kyakkyawan suna.
- Sifofi suna iya canzawa. A wani gwaji bazuwa na shirin horarwa ta wayar salula na watanni uku, mutanen da suka so sauya wata sifa sun sauya fiye da rukunin kwatanci zuwa gefen da suke so, kuma yawancin sauyin ya ɗore a lokacin bibiya.[21]
- A matsakaici, mutane suna ƙara natsuwar zuciya, sauƙin kai da ƙwazo yayin da suke girma.[22]
Yaya ƙarfin waɗannan sakamako yake?
- Haruffa huɗu na gargajiya suna daidai da huɗu daga cikin sifofin Big Five (son jama’a, buɗaɗɗen tunani, sauƙin kai, ƙwazo), shi ya sa binciken Big Five ya shafe su.[23]
- Alaƙoƙin da ke tsakanin sifofi da sakamako gaskiya ne amma kowanne ƙarami ne: alaƙar da aka saba gani tana kusan 0.10 zuwa 0.30, don haka sifofi suna sauya yiwuwa ne maimakon su yanke sakamako. Wani babban aikin maimaita bincike ya tabbatar da yawancin alaƙoƙin da aka gwada, yawanci da tasiri ɗan ƙasa.[24][25]
Layukan da ba su da majiya shawarwarin aiki ne ko bayanin sifofi, ba sakamakon bincike ba.
Gwajin kyauta yana auna dukkan sifofi shida a matsayin percentile. Tambayoyi 62, kusan minti 8, ba rajista.
Ku yi gwajin kyautaShafukan da suka shafi wannan
Majiyoyi
- Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44(1), 1–26.
- Poropat, A. E. (2009). A meta-analysis of the five-factor model of personality and academic performance. Psychological Bulletin, 135(2), 322–338.
- Kern, M. L., & Friedman, H. S. (2008). Do conscientious individuals live longer? A quantitative review. Health Psychology, 27(5), 505–512.
- Bogg, T., & Roberts, B. W. (2004). Conscientiousness and health-related behaviors: A meta-analysis of the leading behavioral contributors to mortality. Psychological Bulletin, 130(6), 887–919.
- Judge, T. A., Bono, J. E., Ilies, R., & Gerhardt, M. W. (2002). Personality and leadership: A qualitative and quantitative review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 765–780.
- Lucas, R. E., & Fujita, F. (2000). Factors influencing the relation between extraversion and pleasant affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 1039–1056.
- Jensen-Campbell, L. A., & Graziano, W. G. (2001). Agreeableness as a moderator of interpersonal conflict. Journal of Personality, 69(2), 323–362.
- Selfhout, M., Burk, W., Branje, S., Denissen, J., van Aken, M., & Meeus, W. (2010). Emerging late adolescent friendship networks and Big Five personality traits: A social network approach. Journal of Personality, 78(2), 509–538.
- Feist, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(4), 290–309.
- Grant, A. M., Gino, F., & Hofmann, D. A. (2011). Reversing the extraverted leadership advantage: The role of employee proactivity. Academy of Management Journal, 54(3), 528–550.
- Grant, A. M. (2013). Rethinking the extraverted sales ideal: The ambivert advantage. Psychological Science, 24(6), 1024–1030.
- Judge, T. A., Livingston, B. A., & Hurst, C. (2012). Do nice guys—and gals—really finish last? The joint effects of sex and agreeableness on income. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(2), 390–407.
- Judge, T. A., Heller, D., & Mount, M. K. (2002). Five-factor model of personality and job satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 530–541.
- Kotov, R., Gamez, W., Schmidt, F., & Watson, D. (2010). Linking "big" personality traits to anxiety, depressive, and substance use disorders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136(5), 768–821.
- Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2005). Psychopathy, Machiavellianism, and narcissism in the Five-Factor Model and the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Individual Differences, 38(7), 1571–1582.
- Pletzer, J. L., Bentvelzen, M., Oostrom, J. K., & de Vries, R. E. (2019). A meta-analysis of the relations between personality and workplace deviance: Big Five versus HEXACO. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 112, 369–383.
- Thielmann, I., Spadaro, G., & Balliet, D. (2020). Personality and prosocial behavior: A theoretical framework and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 146(1), 30–90.
- Steel, P., Schmidt, J., & Shultz, J. (2008). Refining the relationship between personality and subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 134(1), 138–161.
- Connor-Smith, J. K., & Flachsbart, C. (2007). Relations between personality and coping: A meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(6), 1080–1107.
- Zettler, I., Thielmann, I., Hilbig, B. E., & Moshagen, M. (2020). The nomological net of the HEXACO model of personality: A large-scale meta-analytic investigation. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(3), 723–760.
- Stieger, M., Flückiger, C., Rüegger, D., Kowatsch, T., Roberts, B. W., & Allemand, M. (2021). Changing personality traits with the help of a digital personality change intervention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(8), e2017548118.
- Roberts, B. W., Walton, K. E., & Viechtbauer, W. (2006). Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 132(1), 1–25.
- McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1989). Reinterpreting the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator from the perspective of the five-factor model of personality. Journal of Personality, 57(1), 17–40.
- Soto, C. J. (2019). How replicable are links between personality traits and consequential life outcomes? The Life Outcomes of Personality Replication Project. Psychological Science, 30(5), 711–727.
- Ozer, D. J., & Benet-Martínez, V. (2006). Personality and the prediction of consequential outcomes. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 401–421.