Fara gwajin

ESTJ-CA · Mai Tsarawa · Natsattse kuma Mai Fafutuka

ESTJ-CA a wurin aiki: ayyukan da suka dace da salon aiki ga reshen “Natsattse kuma Mai Fafutuka”

ESTJ-CA mutum ne mai son jama’a, mai aiki da zahiri, mai tsauri da mai tsari, kuma a ƙarin sifofi biyu, mai natsuwa da mai buri. A ƙasa: fannonin sha’awa da ayyukan da waɗannan sifofi suke karkata zuwa gare su, abin da binciken da aka wallafa ya ce game da su a wurin aiki, da inda ESTJ-CA yakan ci karo da saɓani.

Kuna son jama’a, ƙafafunku suna ƙasa, kuna magana kai tsaye kuma kuna son tsari. Kuna son tafiyar da abubuwa cikin inganci, kafa bayyanannun buri da tabbatar da cewa mutane sun cika su. Kuna kasancewa cikin natsuwa a ƙarƙashin matsi (natsuwar zuciya mai yawa) kuma matsayi, nasara da karɓuwa suna motsa ku (gaskiya da tawali’u ƙanana). Wannan yanayi ne na amincewa da kai da son gasa. Babban haɗarinsa yana kan aminci na dogon lokaci.

Yadda ESTJ-CA yake aiki, harafi bayan harafi

Yadda kowane harafi yakan bayyana. Waɗannan bayanin sifofin ne, ba sakamakon bincike ba.

Son jama’a
E · Mai son jama’a

Wataƙila kun fi yin tunani da kyau a fili, a taruka, kiraye-kiraye da gajerun hirarraki. Aikin da yake da yawan mu’amala da abokan aiki, abokan ciniki ko masu sauraro yakan ba ku kuzari maimakon ya gajiyar da ku.

Buɗaɗɗen tunani
S · Mai aiki da zahiri

Wataƙila kun fi son ayyuka na zahiri masu sakamakon da ake gani, kuma kuna amincewa da hanyoyin da aka riga aka tabbatar suna aiki.

Sauƙin kai
T · Mai tsauri

Wataƙila kuna gabatar da hankali, ma’auni da sakamako, kuma ba ku jin nauyin faɗin gaskiya mai ɗaci.

Ƙwazo
J · Mai tsari

Wataƙila kuna tsarawa tun da wuri, kuna cika alkawari kuma kun fi son bayyanannun ranakun ƙarshe da nauye-nauye.

Natsuwar zuciya
C · Mai natsuwa

Wataƙila kuna tsayawa daram a ƙarƙashin ranakun ƙarshe, suka da koma baya, kuma wataƙila abokan aiki suna duban ku idan abubuwa suka lalace.

Gaskiya da tawali’u
A · Mai buri

Wataƙila matsayi, karɓuwa da lada suna motsa ku, kuma ba ku jin nauyin tallata aikinku.

Ayyukan da suka fi dacewa da ESTJ-CA: fannonin sha’awa da sifofinku suke karkata zuwa gare su

Fannonin sha’awa na RIASEC na Holland su ne tsarin da aka saba amfani da shi wajen ba da shawarar sana’a. Sifofin hali suna hasashen sha’awa a matsakaici ne kawai, don haka ku ɗauki waɗannan a matsayin wurin fara bincike.

Na kasuwanci

Jagoranci, rinjayarwa, sayarwa da gina kasuwanci.

  • Sha’awar kasuwanci tana daga cikin alaƙoƙi mafi ƙarfi tsakanin sifofi da sha’awa, kuma tana tare da son jama’a: harafinku na E (Mai son jama’a).[1]
Wanda ya kafa kamfaniManajan sayarwaLauyaManajan tallace-tallaceManajan kayayyakiDillalin gidaje da filaye
Na tsari

Tsara bayanai, bayanan ajiya da matakai cikin daidaito.

  • Sha’awar tsari tana da matsakaiciyar alaƙa da ƙwazo: harafinku na J (Mai tsari).[1]
AkantaMasanin lissafin inshoraMai nazarin harkokin kuɗiMataimakin lauyaMai tsara jigilar kayaMai kula da rumbun bayanai
Na zamantakewa

Koyarwa, taimako, hidima da raya mutane.

  • Sha’awar zamantakewa tana da alaƙa da son jama’a, kuma da rauni da sauƙin kai: haruffanku na E (Mai son jama’a) da T (Mai tsauri).[1]
MalamiMa’aikacin jinyaMai ba da shawaraMa’aikacin jin daɗin jama’aMai jinyar motsa jikiƘwararren kula da ma’aikata

Ayyukan da suka haɗa “Na kasuwanci” da “Na tsari”

Fannonin sha’awarku guda biyu mafi ƙarfi a haɗe. Misalai ne da za a bincika, ba hasashe ba.

Manajan kuɗiManajan ayyukaManajan aikiManajan bin ƙa’idojiManajan sayayya

Sifofin ESTJ a wurin aiki: bincike da shawarwarin aiki

  • Masu kafa kamfani suna da ƙwazo fiye da manajoji, kuma ƙwazo yana da alaƙa da shugabanci.[2][3]
  • Wani nazari na bincike na ƙarni ɗaya ya kammala cewa ƙwazo yana da alaƙa da sakamako da yawa a wurin aiki, daga ƙwazon aiki zuwa zama a aiki, ko da yake yawanci a matsakaici.[4]
  • A wani bincike da ya bibiyi mutane tun daga yarinta har zuwa tsufa, ƙwazo ya yi hasashen matsayin aiki da samun kuɗi a gaba.[5]
  • Son jama’a yana hasashen ƙwazon aiki musamman a matsayin gudanarwa da sayarwa.[6]
  • A wani nazari na nazarce-nazarce kan nasarar sana’a, son jama’a ya nuna ƙananan alaƙoƙi masu kyau da albashi da ƙarin girma, da kuma alaƙa ɗan babba da gamsuwa da sana’a.[7]
  • A matsakaici, masu kafa kamfani suna da ɗan ƙarancin sauƙin kai fiye da manajoji.[2]
  • Kuna iya yin nasara inda ake daraja ra’ayi na suka: binciken kuɗi, shari’a, zuba jari, kula da inganci ko gyaran rubutu.

Ƙarfin ESTJ-CA a wurin aiki

  • Daga cikin sifofin hali, ƙwazo shi ne mai hasashen ƙwazon aiki mafi daidaito a dukkan rukunonin ayyukan da aka bincika.[6]
  • A makarantar sakandare da jami’a, yana da alaƙa da makin karatu da ƙarfi kamar basira.[8]
  • A matsakaici, mutane masu yawan ƙwazo suna rayuwa tsawon lokaci, wani ɓangare saboda kyawawan halaye na lafiya.[9][10]
  • Son jama’a ita ce sifar da ta fi daidaito wajen alaƙa da wanda yake fitowa a matsayin shugaba a cikin ƙungiyoyi.[3]
  • A matsakaici, masu son jama’a suna ba da rahoton ƙarin jin daɗin rai.[11]

Abin da haruffan -CA suke ƙara wa ESTJ a wurin aiki

C = Mai natsuwa (natsuwar zuciya), A = Mai buri (gaskiya da tawali’u). Gwajin gargajiya na haruffa huɗu ba ya auna ko ɗaya daga cikinsu, amma duka biyu suna da muhimmanci a wurin aiki:

  • Ayyuka masu tsananin matsi sun dace da ku: likitancin gaggawa, gudanar da ayyuka, kasuwannin kuɗi, gudanarwa da kafa kasuwanci.
  • A nazarce-nazarce kan nasarar sana’a, saurin damuwa (kishiyar harafinku na C) yana daga cikin alaƙoƙi marasa kyau mafi ƙarfi da gamsuwa da sana’a.[7]
  • Fannoni masu gasa da manyan lada kamar sayarwa, kafa kasuwanci, tattaunawar ciniki da matsayin da ake biya bisa ƙwazo sun dace da abubuwan da suke motsa ku. Bayyanannun ƙa’idojin ɗabi’a suna kare amincin da dogon aiki yake dogara da shi.
  • Ƙarancin gaskiya da tawali’u ita ce sifa a tsarin HEXACO da ta fi alaƙa da halaye masu cutarwa a wurin aiki. Dogon aiki yana tafiya ne a kan kyakkyawan suna, don haka bayyanannun ƙa’idojin ɗabi’a fa’ida ce a gasa, ba asara ba.[12]

Ayyukan da haruffan C da A na ESTJ-CA suke da muhimmanci a cikinsu

Shawarwarin aiki bisa ma’anar sifofin, ba sakamakon bincike ba.

C · Mai natsuwa

Natsuwa ta fi daraja a inda matsi yake kullum:

Ayyukan gaggawa da kulawa ta musammanGudanar da ayyuka da magance matsaloliCinikin kasuwar kuɗi da yarjejeniyoyiSadarwa a lokacin rikiciKafa ko jagorantar ƙungiya
A · Mai buri

Wurare masu gasa da suke ba da ladan ƙwazo sun dace da burin matsayi da lada:

Sayarwa da bunƙasa kasuwanciKafa kasuwanciYarjejeniyoyi da zuba jariAyyuka masu kamashon ko hannun jariHanyar hawa matakin shugabanci

Shawarwarin ci gaban sana’a ga ESTJ-CA

  • A wani bincike na fili, manajoji masu son jama’a sun sami sakamako mafi rauni wajen jagorantar ƙungiyoyi masu ƙwazo, saboda ba su buɗe kunne sosai ga ra’ayoyin ’yan ƙungiya ba.[13]
  • Ku saba da yin tambayoyi kafin ku faɗi ra’ayinku. Wannan yana taimakawa musamman a ƙungiyoyi masu ƙwazo.[13]
  • Buɗaɗɗen tunani yana hasashen nasara a horo. A fannonin da suke sauyawa da sauri, ku yi tsammanin ƙarin ƙoƙarin koyo.[6]
  • Ku ƙara sabuwar ƙwarewa ko sabon abu ɗaya a lokaci ɗaya, kuma ku haɗa shi da wani abu mai amfani da kuke yi tuni.
  • Ƙarancin sauƙin kai yana hasashen hanyoyi masu ɓarna a rashin jituwa.[14]
  • Kafin ku ƙalubalanci wani, ku taƙaita matsayinsa ta yadda shi kansa zai yarda da shi.
  • Manyan ma’auni za su iya zama taurin kai idan tsare-tsare suka canza. Ku bar sarari a jadawalinku.

Yaya ƙarfin waɗannan sakamako yake?

  • Haruffa huɗu na gargajiya suna daidai da huɗu daga cikin sifofin Big Five (son jama’a, buɗaɗɗen tunani, sauƙin kai, ƙwazo), shi ya sa binciken Big Five ya shafe su.[15]
  • Alaƙoƙin da ke tsakanin sifofi da sakamako gaskiya ne amma kowanne ƙarami ne: alaƙar da aka saba gani tana kusan 0.10 zuwa 0.30, don haka sifofi suna sauya yiwuwa ne maimakon su yanke sakamako. Wani babban aikin maimaita bincike ya tabbatar da yawancin alaƙoƙin da aka gwada, yawanci da tasiri ɗan ƙasa.[16][17]

Layukan da ba su da majiya shawarwarin aiki ne ko bayanin sifofi, ba sakamakon bincike ba.

Shin ku ESTJ-CA ne da gaske?

Gwajin kyauta yana auna dukkan sifofi shida a matsayin percentile. Tambayoyi 62, kusan minti 8, ba rajista.

Ku yi gwajin kyauta

Shafukan da suka shafi wannan

Majiyoyi

  1. Larson, L. M., Rottinghaus, P. J., & Borgen, F. H. (2002). Meta-analyses of Big Six interests and Big Five personality factors. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61(2), 217–239.
  2. Zhao, H., & Seibert, S. E. (2006). The Big Five personality dimensions and entrepreneurial status: A meta-analytical review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(2), 259–271.
  3. Judge, T. A., Bono, J. E., Ilies, R., & Gerhardt, M. W. (2002). Personality and leadership: A qualitative and quantitative review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 765–780.
  4. Wilmot, M. P., & Ones, D. S. (2019). A century of research on conscientiousness at work. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(46), 23004–23010.
  5. Judge, T. A., Higgins, C. A., Thoresen, C. J., & Barrick, M. R. (1999). The Big Five personality traits, general mental ability, and career success across the life span. Personnel Psychology, 52(3), 621–652.
  6. Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44(1), 1–26.
  7. Ng, T. W. H., Eby, L. T., Sorensen, K. L., & Feldman, D. C. (2005). Predictors of objective and subjective career success: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 58(2), 367–408.
  8. Poropat, A. E. (2009). A meta-analysis of the five-factor model of personality and academic performance. Psychological Bulletin, 135(2), 322–338.
  9. Kern, M. L., & Friedman, H. S. (2008). Do conscientious individuals live longer? A quantitative review. Health Psychology, 27(5), 505–512.
  10. Bogg, T., & Roberts, B. W. (2004). Conscientiousness and health-related behaviors: A meta-analysis of the leading behavioral contributors to mortality. Psychological Bulletin, 130(6), 887–919.
  11. Lucas, R. E., & Fujita, F. (2000). Factors influencing the relation between extraversion and pleasant affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 1039–1056.
  12. Pletzer, J. L., Bentvelzen, M., Oostrom, J. K., & de Vries, R. E. (2019). A meta-analysis of the relations between personality and workplace deviance: Big Five versus HEXACO. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 112, 369–383.
  13. Grant, A. M., Gino, F., & Hofmann, D. A. (2011). Reversing the extraverted leadership advantage: The role of employee proactivity. Academy of Management Journal, 54(3), 528–550.
  14. Jensen-Campbell, L. A., & Graziano, W. G. (2001). Agreeableness as a moderator of interpersonal conflict. Journal of Personality, 69(2), 323–362.
  15. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1989). Reinterpreting the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator from the perspective of the five-factor model of personality. Journal of Personality, 57(1), 17–40.
  16. Soto, C. J. (2019). How replicable are links between personality traits and consequential life outcomes? The Life Outcomes of Personality Replication Project. Psychological Science, 30(5), 711–727.
  17. Ozer, D. J., & Benet-Martínez, V. (2006). Personality and the prediction of consequential outcomes. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 401–421.