ESTP-RA · Mai Aiwatarwa · Mai Saurin Ji kuma Mai Fafutuka
ESTP-RA a abota: yadda ESTP-RA yake samun abokai da riƙe su
ESTP-RA yana gina abota da riƙe ta a matsayin mai son jama’a, mai aiki da zahiri, mai tsauri, mai sassauci, mai saurin ji da mai buri. A ƙasa: yadda hakan yake a zahiri, abin da bincike ya ce game da hali da abota, da inda saɓani zai iya tasowa da abokan da suka bambanta da ku.
Kuna son jama’a, kuna karkata ga aiki, kuna magana kai tsaye kuma kuna saurin sabawa. Kun fi jin daɗin yanayi mai sauri, gasa da warware matsaloli nan take fiye da tsara abubuwa na nesa. Kuna jin motsin rai da ƙarfi (natsuwar zuciya ƙarama) kuma matsayi da karɓuwa suna motsa ku (gaskiya da tawali’u ƙanana). Burin samun nasara zai iya zama inji mai ƙarfi. Ku yi hattara da damuwar da take zuwa idan kuka ɗaura darajarku da sakamako.
Yadda ESTP-RA yake a matsayin aboki
Yadda kowane harafi yakan bayyana. Waɗannan bayanin sifofin ne, ba sakamakon bincike ba.
Wataƙila kuna da faffaɗan da’irar mutane, kuma sau da yawa ku ne kuke ba da shawarar fita ko haɗa mutane da juna.
Ayyukan da kuke yi tare da taimaka wa juna wataƙila su ne mannen abotarku.
Wataƙila ku ne abokin da yake faɗin abin da wasu suke tunani, kuma kuna daraja abokan da za su iya jure gaskiya.
Wataƙila zama da ku yana da sauƙi kuma kuna shirye don shirin ƙarshe na minti, ko da yake ba kwa saurin bibiya.
Wataƙila kuna lura da yanayin zuciyar abokai, kuma wataƙila kuna sake tunanin hirarraki bayan sun wuce kuna mamakin yadda suka kasance.
Wataƙila zama da ku yana ba da kuzari da ƙwarin gwiwa, kuma kuna da ƙwarewa wajen gina hanyoyin sadarwa masu amfani.
Sifofin ESTP a abota: bincike da shawarwarin aiki
- Masu son jama’a suna saurin samun sababbin abokai kuma a ƙarshe suna da faffaɗan da’irar abokai.[1][2]
- Babbar hanyar sadarwa ba ta tabbatar da abota ta kurkusa ba. Ku ware lokaci kuma don haɗuwa ɗaya da ɗaya.
- A wani bincike da ya bibiyi ɗaliban jami’a na watanni 18, hali ya fi hasashen yadda dangantakarsu ta haɓaka fiye da yadda dangantaka ta sauya hali. Son jama’a ya yi hasashen gina babbar hanyar sadarwa da sauran ɗalibai.[3]
- Abokan da suke daraja gaskiya za su daraja ku. Wasu kuma wataƙila za su buƙaci ku sassauta yadda kuke faɗin abu.
- Ƙarancin sauƙin kai yana hasashen hanyoyi masu ɓarna a rikici tsakanin mutane, don haka yadda kuke nuna rashin yarda ya fi muhimmanci fiye da ko kun ƙi yarda.[4]
- Zama da ku yana da daɗi kuma yana da sauƙi a jitu da ku. Ku saka tunatarwa don ranakun haihuwa da tuntuɓar mutane.
- Sau da yawa ana gina abotarku a kan ayyukan da kuke yi tare (wasanni, gyaran abubuwa, girki).
ESTP-RA tare da abokai masu bambanci: abubuwan da suke kawo saɓani da mafita
Inda ku da ɗayan mutumin kuke a gefe dabam-dabam na harafi ɗaya. Shawarwarin aiki, ba sakamakon bincike ba.
Ɗaya yana son manyan taruka, ɗayan kuma haɗuwa ku biyu kawai. Ku riƙa musanya tsakanin hanyoyin biyu.
Ku riƙa musanya tsakanin tattauna ra’ayoyi da yin ayyuka na zahiri tare.
Ɗaya yana magana kai tsaye, ɗayan kuma yana da hankali. Zai taimaka idan wanda ya fi magana kai tsaye ya fara da abin da yake daraja.
Ɗaya yana tsarawa, ɗayan kuma yana yin abu nan take. Ku bar mai tsarawa ya sa lokaci, ɗayan kuma ya zaɓi abin da za a yi.
Abokin da ya fi natsuwa yakan zama ginshiƙin dogaro. Ku tabbatar cewa taimako yana tafiya ta ɓangarorin biyu.
Ɗaya yana neman matsayi, ɗayan kuma mai tawali’u ne. Kada ku bar abota ta koma kan kwatanta kai.
Yadda sifofin ESTP-RA suke haɗuwa
Bayanan haɗe-haɗe suna sa sakamakon bincike dabam-dabam gefe da gefe. Ba bincike ne dabam a kan wannan nau’i kansa ba.
- Mutane suna ba ku kuzari, amma kuna saurin jin abubuwa a rai, don haka wataƙila kuna neman mutane idan kuna cikin damuwa. Ku zaɓi mutanen da suke kwantar muku da hankali, ba waɗanda suke ƙara muku fargaba ba.
Abin da haruffan -RA suke ƙara wa ESTP a abota
R = Mai saurin ji (natsuwar zuciya), A = Mai buri (gaskiya da tawali’u). Gwajin gargajiya na haruffa huɗu ba ya auna ko ɗaya daga cikinsu, amma duka biyu suna da muhimmanci a abota:
- Sau da yawa kuna lura idan abokai suna cikin wahala. Ku zaɓi abokan da su ma za su iya karɓar yadda kuke ji.
- Zama da ku yana da daɗi kuma kuna ƙarfafa gwiwa. Ku tabbatar abokanku suna jin kuna daraja su don yadda suke, ba don abin da za su iya ba ku ba.
- A matsakaici, mutanen da suke da ƙarancin gaskiya da tawali’u ba sa yawan haɗa kai a wasannin tattalin arziki da suka dogara da aminci. A abota, adalcin da ake gani (raba kuɗaɗe, mayar da alheri) yana daidaita hakan.[5]
Yaya ƙarfin waɗannan sakamako yake?
- Haruffa huɗu na gargajiya suna daidai da huɗu daga cikin sifofin Big Five (son jama’a, buɗaɗɗen tunani, sauƙin kai, ƙwazo), shi ya sa binciken Big Five ya shafe su.[6]
- Alaƙoƙin da ke tsakanin sifofi da sakamako gaskiya ne amma kowanne ƙarami ne: alaƙar da aka saba gani tana kusan 0.10 zuwa 0.30, don haka sifofi suna sauya yiwuwa ne maimakon su yanke sakamako. Wani babban aikin maimaita bincike ya tabbatar da yawancin alaƙoƙin da aka gwada, yawanci da tasiri ɗan ƙasa.[7][8]
Layukan da ba su da majiya shawarwarin aiki ne ko bayanin sifofi, ba sakamakon bincike ba.
Gwajin kyauta yana auna dukkan sifofi shida a matsayin percentile. Tambayoyi 62, kusan minti 8, ba rajista.
Ku yi gwajin kyautaKuna da sakamako tuni? Ku kwatanta da aboki.
Shafukan da suka shafi wannan
Majiyoyi
- Selfhout, M., Burk, W., Branje, S., Denissen, J., van Aken, M., & Meeus, W. (2010). Emerging late adolescent friendship networks and Big Five personality traits: A social network approach. Journal of Personality, 78(2), 509–538.
- Harris, K., & Vazire, S. (2016). On friendship development and the Big Five personality traits. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 10(11), 647–667.
- Asendorpf, J. B., & Wilpers, S. (1998). Personality effects on social relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1531–1544.
- Jensen-Campbell, L. A., & Graziano, W. G. (2001). Agreeableness as a moderator of interpersonal conflict. Journal of Personality, 69(2), 323–362.
- Thielmann, I., Spadaro, G., & Balliet, D. (2020). Personality and prosocial behavior: A theoretical framework and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 146(1), 30–90.
- McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1989). Reinterpreting the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator from the perspective of the five-factor model of personality. Journal of Personality, 57(1), 17–40.
- Soto, C. J. (2019). How replicable are links between personality traits and consequential life outcomes? The Life Outcomes of Personality Replication Project. Psychological Science, 30(5), 711–727.
- Ozer, D. J., & Benet-Martínez, V. (2006). Personality and the prediction of consequential outcomes. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 401–421.