Fara gwajin
Menu
Ku yi gwajin kyauta
Harshe

ISTP-RM · Gwanin Hannu · Mai Saurin Ji kuma Mai Gaskiya

ISTP-RM a soyayya: dangantaka, neman aure da dacewa

ISTP-RM yana kawo halin mai son kaɗaici, mai aiki da zahiri, mai tsauri da mai sassauci (tare da mai saurin ji da mai tawali’u) cikin dangantaka. A nan za ku karanta yadda hakan yakan bayyana tare da masoyi, waɗanne daga cikin waɗannan sifofi ne bincike yake danganta su da gamsuwa a dangantaka, da yadda za a tafiyar da bambance-bambance.

Kuna da shiru, kuna aiki da zahiri, kuna da gaskiya kuma kuna da sassauci. Kuna son fahimtar yadda abubuwa suke aiki ta hanyar yin aiki da su, kuna ƙirƙirar mafita nan take kuma kuna kare ’yancinku. Kuna jin motsin rai da ƙarfi kuma kuna saurin lura da damuwa (natsuwar zuciya ƙarama), kuma kuna da tawali’u da adalci (gaskiya da tawali’u masu yawa). Kuna damuwa da yin abin da yake daidai, wani lokaci har ku yi ta tunani a kansa.

  • Harafinku na R (Mai saurin ji) yana da muhimmanci a nan: natsuwar zuciya tana daga cikin abubuwan da suka fi dogaro wajen hasashen gamsuwa a dangantaka, kuma ana iya ƙarfafa ta.[1][2]

Yadda ISTP-RM yake soyayya, harafi bayan harafi

Yadda kowane harafi yakan bayyana. Waɗannan bayanin sifofin ne, ba sakamakon bincike ba.

Son jama’a
I · Mai son kaɗaici

Wataƙila kuna nuna kulawa ta hanyar mai da hankali da lokaci ku biyu kawai maimakon cikakken jadawalin zamantakewa, kuma wataƙila kuna buƙatar lokacin hutu har daga mutanen da kuke so.

Buɗaɗɗen tunani
S · Mai aiki da zahiri

Wataƙila kuna nuna soyayya ta hanyar taimako na zahiri da al’adun yau da kullum masu dogaro fiye da manyan nune-nune ko dogayen hirarraki marasa zahiri.

Sauƙin kai
T · Mai tsauri

Wataƙila kun fi daraja gaskiya fiye da kwantar da hankali, kuma kuna iya nuna kulawa ta hanyar warware matsaloli maimakon nuna tausayi.

Ƙwazo
P · Mai sassauci

Wataƙila kuna kawo yin abu nan take da nishaɗi, kuma wataƙila kuna ƙin dangantaka mai cike da jadawali.

Natsuwar zuciya
R · Mai saurin ji

Wataƙila kuna jin hawa da saukar dangantaka da ƙarfi kuma kuna iya buƙatar ƙarin kwantar da hankali a lokutan damuwa.

Gaskiya da tawali’u
M · Mai tawali’u

Wataƙila kuna da gaskiya, ba ku son wasan yaudara, kuma kuna tsammanin haka daga masoyi.

Sifofin ISTP a dangantaka: bincike da shawarwarin aiki

  • Sauƙin kai na masoyi yana da alaƙa da gamsuwa. Ku haɗa suka da karimci da ake iya gani a fili.[1]
  • A yankuna 10 na duniya, ƙarancin ƙwazo yana da alaƙa da rashin aminci a dangantaka. Bayyanannun yarjejeniyoyi suna taimakawa.[3]
  • Ƙwazon masoyi yana da alaƙa da gamsuwa: cika ƙananan alkawura yana da muhimmanci.[1]
  • Ƙwazon abokin aure ya yi hasashen har gamsuwa da aiki, samun kuɗi da ƙarin girma na ɗayan a cikin shekaru biyar, don haka kasancewa abin dogaro a gida yana da tasiri fiye da dangantakar kanta.[4]
  • Son kaɗaici yana hasashen gamsuwa a dangantaka kaɗan ƙwarai. Halin yin shiru ba matsalar dacewa ba ne.[1]
  • A matsakaici, bambance-bambancen buɗaɗɗen tunani tsakanin masoya suna da ƙaramin tasiri a kan gamsuwa.[1][5]

Shin dacewa ta dogara ne da kasancewa nau’i ɗaya?

  • Kamanceceniyar hali tana bayyana ƙalilan ne kawai. A manyan samfurori na ƙasa, kamanceceniyar masoya ba ta ƙara kusan komai ba bayan sifofin kowannensu.[5]
  • Abin da yake hasashen ingancin dangantaka shi ne galibi natsuwar zuciya, sauƙin kai da ƙwazo na kowane masoyi; son jama’a yana da ƙaramin matsayi.[1]

Don haka babu “abokin rayuwa mafi dacewa” ga ISTP-RM da bincike yake goyon baya. Duk da haka bambance-bambance suna kawo saɓani, kuma ana iya tafiyar da wannan saɓani.

ISTP-RM tare da masoyi mai bambanci: abubuwan da suke kawo saɓani da mafita

Inda ku da ɗayan mutumin kuke a gefe dabam-dabam na harafi ɗaya. Shawarwarin aiki, ba sakamakon bincike ba.

Son jama’a
Tare da wanda ya fi zama mai son jama’a (E)

Kuzarin zamantakewa dabam-dabam: ku yarda kan tsarin ƙarshen mako na yau da kullum (misali dare ɗaya na fita da rana ɗaya ta natsuwa), maimakon yin ciniki a kan kowane taro idan ya zo.

Buɗaɗɗen tunani
Tare da wanda ya fi zama mai hasashe (N)

Ɗaya yana neman sababbin abubuwa, ɗayan kuma yana son abin da aka saba. Ku riƙa musanya wajen zaɓi kuma ku kiyaye al’ada ɗaya da kuke so ku duka.

Sauƙin kai
Tare da wanda ya fi zama mai tausayi (F)

Salon saɓani dabam-dabam: ɗaya yana faɗa, ɗayan kuma yana ƙyale abu. Ku yarda cewa faɗin matsala da wuri kulawa ne, ba hari ba.

Ƙwazo
Tare da wanda ya fi zama mai tsari (J)

Ɗaya yana tsarawa, ɗayan kuma yana ƙirƙira nan take: ku raba ayyuka bisa ƙarfin kowa (wanda zai yi ajiyar wuri ya bibiya, wanda zai sabawa da yanayi) maimakon yin jayayya kan salo.

Natsuwar zuciya
Tare da wanda ya fi zama mai natsuwa (C)

Ɗaya ya fi saurin jin damuwa. Masoyin da ya fi natsuwa ya fi taimakawa idan ya fara gane yadda ɗayan yake ji kafin ya yi ƙoƙarin warware matsalar.

Gaskiya da tawali’u
Tare da wanda ya fi zama mai buri (A)

Ra’ayoyi dabam-dabam game da matsayi da kuɗi. Ku tattauna a fili game da kashe kuɗi, buri da ma’anar “nasara” ga kowannenku.

Yadda sifofin ISTP-RM suke haɗuwa

Bayanan haɗe-haɗe suna sa sakamakon bincike dabam-dabam gefe da gefe. Ba bincike ne dabam a kan wannan nau’i kansa ba.

  • Mai magana kai tsaye amma mai adalci: kuna iya zama mai tsauri kuma a lokaci guda mai manyan ƙa’idojin ɗabi’a. Waɗanda suka san ku suna amincewa da ku, amma baƙi wataƙila za su ga tsaurin kawai.[6]

Abin da haruffan -RM suke ƙara wa ISTP a soyayya

R = Mai saurin ji (natsuwar zuciya), M = Mai tawali’u (gaskiya da tawali’u). Gwajin gargajiya na haruffa huɗu ba ya auna ko ɗaya daga cikinsu, amma duka biyu suna da muhimmanci a soyayya:

  • Saurin damuwa yana hasashen ƙarancin gamsuwa da ɗorewa a dangantaka. Idan kuka faɗi abin da yake damun ku (“ina cikin damuwa, ban yi fushi da kai ba”), kuna taimaka wa masoyinku ya mayar da martani yadda ya dace.[1][2]
  • A wani bincike na shekaru da dama kan ma’aurata, saurin damuwa a wajen kowane ɗayansu ya yi hasashen saki da rashin farin ciki a aure. Wannan karkata ce, ba ƙaddara ba: natsuwar zuciya yawanci tana ƙaruwa da shekaru kuma tana amsa ƙoƙari na da gangan.[7][8][9]
  • Yawan gaskiya da tawali’u yana nufin ƙarancin haɗuwa da sifofin yaudara na “dark triad”, waɗanda suke lalata aminci.[10]

Yaya ƙarfin waɗannan sakamako yake?

  • Haruffa huɗu na gargajiya suna daidai da huɗu daga cikin sifofin Big Five (son jama’a, buɗaɗɗen tunani, sauƙin kai, ƙwazo), shi ya sa binciken Big Five ya shafe su.[11]
  • Alaƙoƙin da ke tsakanin sifofi da sakamako gaskiya ne amma kowanne ƙarami ne: alaƙar da aka saba gani tana kusan 0.10 zuwa 0.30, don haka sifofi suna sauya yiwuwa ne maimakon su yanke sakamako. Wani babban aikin maimaita bincike ya tabbatar da yawancin alaƙoƙin da aka gwada, yawanci da tasiri ɗan ƙasa.[12][13]

Layukan da ba su da majiya shawarwarin aiki ne ko bayanin sifofi, ba sakamakon bincike ba.

Shin ku ISTP-RM ne da gaske?

Gwajin kyauta yana auna dukkan sifofi shida a matsayin percentile. Tambayoyi 62, kusan minti 8, ba rajista.

Ku yi gwajin kyauta

Kuna da sakamako tuni? Ku kwatanta da masoyinku.

Shafukan da suka shafi wannan

ISTP a soyayya
Dukkan rassa huɗu na ISTP
ISTP-CM a soyayya
Natsattse kuma Mai Gaskiya
ISTP-CA a soyayya
Natsattse kuma Mai Fafutuka
ISTP-RA a soyayya
Mai Saurin Ji kuma Mai Fafutuka
ESTP-RM a soyayya
Mai Aiwatarwa: mai son jama’a maimakon mai son kaɗaici
INTP-RM a soyayya
Mai Nazari: mai hasashe maimakon mai aiki da zahiri
ISFP-RM a soyayya
Mai Fasaha: mai tausayi maimakon mai tsauri
ISTJ-RM a soyayya
Mai Gudanarwa: mai tsari maimakon mai sassauci

Majiyoyi

  1. Malouff, J. M., Thorsteinsson, E. B., Schutte, N. S., Bhullar, N., & Rooke, S. E. (2010). The five-factor model of personality and relationship satisfaction of intimate partners: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 44(1), 124–127.
  2. Karney, B. R., & Bradbury, T. N. (1995). The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: A review of theory, method, and research. Psychological Bulletin, 118(1), 3–34.
  3. Schmitt, D. P. (2004). The Big Five related to risky sexual behaviour across 10 world regions: Differential personality associations of sexual promiscuity and relationship infidelity. European Journal of Personality, 18(4), 301–319.
  4. Solomon, B. C., & Jackson, J. J. (2014). The long reach of one’s spouse: Spouses’ personality influences occupational success. Psychological Science, 25(12), 2189–2198.
  5. Dyrenforth, P. S., Kashy, D. A., Donnellan, M. B., & Lucas, R. E. (2010). Predicting relationship and life satisfaction from personality in nationally representative samples from three countries: The relative importance of actor, partner, and similarity effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(4), 690–702.
  6. Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2007). Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11(2), 150–166.
  7. Kelly, E. L., & Conley, J. J. (1987). Personality and compatibility: A prospective analysis of marital stability and marital satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(1), 27–40.
  8. Roberts, B. W., Walton, K. E., & Viechtbauer, W. (2006). Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 132(1), 1–25.
  9. Hudson, N. W., & Fraley, R. C. (2015). Volitional personality trait change: Can people choose to change their personality traits? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(3), 490–507.
  10. Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2005). Psychopathy, Machiavellianism, and narcissism in the Five-Factor Model and the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Individual Differences, 38(7), 1571–1582.
  11. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1989). Reinterpreting the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator from the perspective of the five-factor model of personality. Journal of Personality, 57(1), 17–40.
  12. Soto, C. J. (2019). How replicable are links between personality traits and consequential life outcomes? The Life Outcomes of Personality Replication Project. Psychological Science, 30(5), 711–727.
  13. Ozer, D. J., & Benet-Martínez, V. (2006). Personality and the prediction of consequential outcomes. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 401–421.