ENFP-CA · Tartsatsi · Natsattse kuma Mai Fafutuka
ENFP-CA a wurin aiki: ayyukan da suka dace da salon aiki ga reshen “Natsattse kuma Mai Fafutuka”
ENFP-CA mutum ne mai son jama’a, mai hasashe, mai tausayi da mai sassauci, kuma a ƙarin sifofi biyu, mai natsuwa da mai buri. A ƙasa: fannonin sha’awa da ayyukan da waɗannan sifofi suke karkata zuwa gare su, abin da binciken da aka wallafa ya ce game da su a wurin aiki, da inda ENFP-CA yakan ci karo da saɓani.
Kuna son jama’a, kuna son bincike kuma kuna da kirki, kuma kun fi son ƙirƙira nan take fiye da tsarawa. Kuna haɗuwa da mutane da ra’ayoyi cikin sauƙi. Ƙalubalenku yawanci shi ne mai da hankali da kammalawa, ba samun kwarin gwiwa ba. Kuna kasancewa cikin natsuwa a ƙarƙashin matsi (natsuwar zuciya mai yawa) kuma matsayi, nasara da karɓuwa suna motsa ku (gaskiya da tawali’u ƙanana). Wannan yanayi ne na amincewa da kai da son gasa. Babban haɗarinsa yana kan aminci na dogon lokaci.
Yadda ENFP-CA yake aiki, harafi bayan harafi
Yadda kowane harafi yakan bayyana. Waɗannan bayanin sifofin ne, ba sakamakon bincike ba.
Wataƙila kun fi yin tunani da kyau a fili, a taruka, kiraye-kiraye da gajerun hirarraki. Aikin da yake da yawan mu’amala da abokan aiki, abokan ciniki ko masu sauraro yakan ba ku kuzari maimakon ya gajiyar da ku.
Wataƙila ra’ayoyi, tsare-tsare da damammaki suna jan hankalinku, kuma kuna gajiya idan aiki ya zama maimaitawa kawai.
Wataƙila kuna lura da yadda shawarwari suke shafar mutane kuma kuna daraja yanayin haɗin kai a ƙungiya.
Wataƙila kuna aiki ta hanyar fashewar kuzari, kuna saurin sabawa da sauyi kuma kun fi son abubuwa dabam-dabam fiye da tsayayyun al’adu.
Wataƙila kuna tsayawa daram a ƙarƙashin ranakun ƙarshe, suka da koma baya, kuma wataƙila abokan aiki suna duban ku idan abubuwa suka lalace.
Wataƙila matsayi, karɓuwa da lada suna motsa ku, kuma ba ku jin nauyin tallata aikinku.
Ayyukan da suka fi dacewa da ENFP-CA: fannonin sha’awa da sifofinku suke karkata zuwa gare su
Fannonin sha’awa na RIASEC na Holland su ne tsarin da aka saba amfani da shi wajen ba da shawarar sana’a. Sifofin hali suna hasashen sha’awa a matsakaici ne kawai, don haka ku ɗauki waɗannan a matsayin wurin fara bincike.
Ƙirƙira, zane da bayyana ra’ayoyi.
- Buɗaɗɗen tunani, harafinku na N (Mai hasashe), yana da alaƙa mafi ƙarfi tsakanin sifofi da sha’awa: da sha’awar fasaha.[1]
Koyarwa, taimako, hidima da raya mutane.
- Sha’awar zamantakewa tana da alaƙa da son jama’a, kuma da rauni da sauƙin kai: haruffanku na E (Mai son jama’a) da F (Mai tausayi).[1]
Jagoranci, rinjayarwa, sayarwa da gina kasuwanci.
- Sha’awar kasuwanci tana daga cikin alaƙoƙi mafi ƙarfi tsakanin sifofi da sha’awa, kuma tana tare da son jama’a: harafinku na E (Mai son jama’a).[1]
Ayyukan da suka haɗa “Na fasaha” da “Na zamantakewa”
Fannonin sha’awarku guda biyu mafi ƙarfi a haɗe. Misalai ne da za a bincika, ba hasashe ba.
Sifofin ENFP a wurin aiki: bincike da shawarwarin aiki
- Ayyuka masu ɗawainiya dabam-dabam da saurin samun martani sun dace da ku. Ku aro tsari daga kayan aiki, ranakun ƙarshe da abokan aiki.
- A wani bincike na dogon lokaci, ƙwazon da aka auna tun farkon rayuwa ya yi hasashen matsayin aiki da samun kuɗi a gaba. Kayan aiki, ranakun ƙarshe da abokan da kuke ba da rahoto gare su hanyoyi ne na zahiri na aron tsari.[2]
- Son jama’a yana hasashen ƙwazon aiki musamman a matsayin gudanarwa da sayarwa.[3]
- A wani nazari na nazarce-nazarce kan nasarar sana’a, son jama’a ya nuna ƙananan alaƙoƙi masu kyau da albashi da ƙarin girma, da kuma alaƙa ɗan babba da gamsuwa da sana’a.[4]
- Ku nemi aikin da ba za ku daina koyo ba: bincike, zane, dabaru, rubutu ko sababbin fannoni.
- Sauƙin kai yana hasashen ƙwazon aiki gabaɗaya da rauni ne kawai a ayyuka dabam-dabam.[3]
Ƙarfin ENFP-CA a wurin aiki
- Kuna saurin sabawa idan tsare-tsare suka canza, kuma ba ku da takura wajen ƙirƙirar mafita nan take.
- Son jama’a ita ce sifar da ta fi daidaito wajen alaƙa da wanda yake fitowa a matsayin shugaba a cikin ƙungiyoyi.[5]
- A matsakaici, masu son jama’a suna ba da rahoton ƙarin jin daɗin rai.[6]
- Kuna saurin gina hanyar sadarwa da mutane, wanda yake taimakawa ga damammakin da suke zuwa ta hanyar shawarwarin mutane.
- Buɗaɗɗen tunani yana da alaƙa mai daidaito da nasarar ƙirƙira, a fasaha da kuma a kimiyya.[7]
Yadda sifofin ENFP-CA suke haɗuwa
Bayanan haɗe-haɗe suna sa sakamakon bincike dabam-dabam gefe da gefe. Ba bincike ne dabam a kan wannan nau’i kansa ba.
- Yawan hasashe da ƙarancin tsari: wataƙila kuna da ra’ayoyi fiye da waɗanda kuke kammalawa. Buɗaɗɗen tunani yana da alaƙa da ƙirƙira, ƙwazo kuma yana da alaƙa da kammala aiki, don haka wani tsari ko mutumin da zai taimaka muku ku kammala abin da kuka fara zai ninka ƙarfinku.[7][3]
- Mai karimci amma mai neman matsayi: tsarin HEXACO yana bambanta sauƙin kai (kirki) da gaskiya da tawali’u (gaskiya da adalci). Idan ana ganin nuna abin da ba haka yake ba, mutane za su iya jin cewa karimcinku na lissafi ne.[8]
Abin da haruffan -CA suke ƙara wa ENFP a wurin aiki
C = Mai natsuwa (natsuwar zuciya), A = Mai buri (gaskiya da tawali’u). Gwajin gargajiya na haruffa huɗu ba ya auna ko ɗaya daga cikinsu, amma duka biyu suna da muhimmanci a wurin aiki:
- Ayyuka masu tsananin matsi sun dace da ku: likitancin gaggawa, gudanar da ayyuka, kasuwannin kuɗi, gudanarwa da kafa kasuwanci.
- A nazarce-nazarce kan nasarar sana’a, saurin damuwa (kishiyar harafinku na C) yana daga cikin alaƙoƙi marasa kyau mafi ƙarfi da gamsuwa da sana’a.[4]
- Fannoni masu gasa da manyan lada kamar sayarwa, kafa kasuwanci, tattaunawar ciniki da matsayin da ake biya bisa ƙwazo sun dace da abubuwan da suke motsa ku. Bayyanannun ƙa’idojin ɗabi’a suna kare amincin da dogon aiki yake dogara da shi.
- Ƙarancin gaskiya da tawali’u ita ce sifa a tsarin HEXACO da ta fi alaƙa da halaye masu cutarwa a wurin aiki. Dogon aiki yana tafiya ne a kan kyakkyawan suna, don haka bayyanannun ƙa’idojin ɗabi’a fa’ida ce a gasa, ba asara ba.[9]
Ayyukan da haruffan C da A na ENFP-CA suke da muhimmanci a cikinsu
Shawarwarin aiki bisa ma’anar sifofin, ba sakamakon bincike ba.
Natsuwa ta fi daraja a inda matsi yake kullum:
Wurare masu gasa da suke ba da ladan ƙwazo sun dace da burin matsayi da lada:
Shawarwarin ci gaban sana’a ga ENFP-CA
- A wani bincike na fili, manajoji masu son jama’a sun sami sakamako mafi rauni wajen jagorantar ƙungiyoyi masu ƙwazo, saboda ba su buɗe kunne sosai ga ra’ayoyin ’yan ƙungiya ba.[10]
- Ku saba da yin tambayoyi kafin ku faɗi ra’ayinku. Wannan yana taimakawa musamman a ƙungiyoyi masu ƙwazo.[10]
- Kuna iya rasa sha’awa idan abu ya zama na yau da kullum. Ku tsara matakin kula da ayyuka tun da wuri.
- Ku haɗa ƙirƙirar ra’ayoyi da ranar ƙarshe ko da wanda zai taimaka muku ku kammala.
- Sauƙin kai yana da alaƙa ta kishiyar juna da samun kuɗi, kuma tasirin ya fi girma a wajen maza.[11]
- Ku ɗauki tsayawa kan matsayinku a matsayin ƙwarewa. Kirki da faɗin abin da kuke buƙata a fili suna tafiya tare sosai.
- Ƙarancin ƙwazo yana da alaƙa da jinkirta abubuwa da halaye masu haɗari ga lafiya (abinci, motsa jiki, shaye-shaye).[12][13]
Yaya ƙarfin waɗannan sakamako yake?
- Haruffa huɗu na gargajiya suna daidai da huɗu daga cikin sifofin Big Five (son jama’a, buɗaɗɗen tunani, sauƙin kai, ƙwazo), shi ya sa binciken Big Five ya shafe su.[14]
- Alaƙoƙin da ke tsakanin sifofi da sakamako gaskiya ne amma kowanne ƙarami ne: alaƙar da aka saba gani tana kusan 0.10 zuwa 0.30, don haka sifofi suna sauya yiwuwa ne maimakon su yanke sakamako. Wani babban aikin maimaita bincike ya tabbatar da yawancin alaƙoƙin da aka gwada, yawanci da tasiri ɗan ƙasa.[15][16]
Layukan da ba su da majiya shawarwarin aiki ne ko bayanin sifofi, ba sakamakon bincike ba.
Gwajin kyauta yana auna dukkan sifofi shida a matsayin percentile. Tambayoyi 62, kusan minti 8, ba rajista.
Ku yi gwajin kyautaShafukan da suka shafi wannan
Majiyoyi
- Larson, L. M., Rottinghaus, P. J., & Borgen, F. H. (2002). Meta-analyses of Big Six interests and Big Five personality factors. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61(2), 217–239.
- Judge, T. A., Higgins, C. A., Thoresen, C. J., & Barrick, M. R. (1999). The Big Five personality traits, general mental ability, and career success across the life span. Personnel Psychology, 52(3), 621–652.
- Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44(1), 1–26.
- Ng, T. W. H., Eby, L. T., Sorensen, K. L., & Feldman, D. C. (2005). Predictors of objective and subjective career success: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 58(2), 367–408.
- Judge, T. A., Bono, J. E., Ilies, R., & Gerhardt, M. W. (2002). Personality and leadership: A qualitative and quantitative review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 765–780.
- Lucas, R. E., & Fujita, F. (2000). Factors influencing the relation between extraversion and pleasant affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 1039–1056.
- Feist, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(4), 290–309.
- Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2007). Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11(2), 150–166.
- Pletzer, J. L., Bentvelzen, M., Oostrom, J. K., & de Vries, R. E. (2019). A meta-analysis of the relations between personality and workplace deviance: Big Five versus HEXACO. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 112, 369–383.
- Grant, A. M., Gino, F., & Hofmann, D. A. (2011). Reversing the extraverted leadership advantage: The role of employee proactivity. Academy of Management Journal, 54(3), 528–550.
- Judge, T. A., Livingston, B. A., & Hurst, C. (2012). Do nice guys—and gals—really finish last? The joint effects of sex and agreeableness on income. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(2), 390–407.
- Steel, P. (2007). The nature of procrastination: A meta-analytic and theoretical review of quintessential self-regulatory failure. Psychological Bulletin, 133(1), 65–94.
- Bogg, T., & Roberts, B. W. (2004). Conscientiousness and health-related behaviors: A meta-analysis of the leading behavioral contributors to mortality. Psychological Bulletin, 130(6), 887–919.
- McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1989). Reinterpreting the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator from the perspective of the five-factor model of personality. Journal of Personality, 57(1), 17–40.
- Soto, C. J. (2019). How replicable are links between personality traits and consequential life outcomes? The Life Outcomes of Personality Replication Project. Psychological Science, 30(5), 711–727.
- Ozer, D. J., & Benet-Martínez, V. (2006). Personality and the prediction of consequential outcomes. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 401–421.