Fara gwajin

ENTJ-CM · Jagora · Natsattse kuma Mai Gaskiya

Ƙarfi da raunin ENTJ-CM: damuwa da ci gaban kai

A taƙaice, ENTJ-CM: mai son jama’a, mai hangen nesa, mai yanke shawara, mai himma, kuma a ƙarin sifofi biyu, mai natsuwa da mai tawali’u. A ƙasa: inda ENTJ-CM yakan yi fice, inda yakan yi tuntuɓe, yadda yake jure damuwa, da abin da bincike ya ce game da sauyin sifofi a tsawon lokaci.

Kuna da tsayuwa kan ra’ayi a gaban jama’a, ra’ayoyi suna motsa ku, kuna magana kai tsaye kuma kuna da tsari sosai. Kuna son jagoranci, kafa manufofi na dogon lokaci da tura abubuwa har su kai ga sakamako. Son jama’a da ƙwazo duka suna da alaƙa da wanda yake fitowa a matsayin shugaba. Kuna kasancewa cikin natsuwa a ƙarƙashin matsi (natsuwar zuciya mai yawa) kuma kuna da tawali’u da adalci (gaskiya da tawali’u masu yawa). Sau da yawa wasu suna ganin ku a matsayin abin dogaro a lokacin wahala da kuma amintattu da nauyi.

Bayanin ENTJ-CM, harafi bayan harafi

Yadda kowane harafi yakan bayyana. Waɗannan bayanin sifofin ne, ba sakamakon bincike ba.

Son jama’a
E · Mai son jama’a

Kuzarin zamantakewa babbar dukiya ce. Haɗarinsa shi ne rufe muryoyin masu shiru, har da lokacinku na yin tunani.

Buɗaɗɗen tunani
N · Mai hasashe

Son bincike yana sa koyo ya yi muku sauƙi. Ƙalubalen shi ne ku tsaya da ra’ayi har ya ratsa tsakiyarsa mara armashi.

Sauƙin kai
T · Mai tsauri

Gaskiya tana da amfani. Ƙalubalen shi ne tabbatar da cewa ana karɓarta a matsayin taimako, ba hari ba.

Ƙwazo
J · Mai tsari

Horon kai yana sa a kammala abubuwa. Ƙalubalen shi ne ku kasance masu sassauci idan tsare-tsare suka zama dole a sauya su.

Natsuwar zuciya
C · Mai natsuwa

Natsuwa dukiya ce. Ƙalubalen shi ne lura da damuwar da wasu suke ciki, kuma lokaci-lokaci a kanku ma, wadda ba ku jin ta da ƙarfi.

Gaskiya da tawali’u
M · Mai tawali’u

Mutunci yana gina aminci. Ƙalubalen shi ne ku kare kanku ba tare da jin cewa kuna taƙama ba.

Ƙarfin ENTJ-CM

  • Daga cikin sifofin hali, ƙwazo shi ne mai hasashen ƙwazon aiki mafi daidaito a dukkan rukunonin ayyukan da aka bincika.[1]
  • A makarantar sakandare da jami’a, yana da alaƙa da makin karatu da ƙarfi kamar basira.[2]
  • A matsakaici, mutane masu yawan ƙwazo suna rayuwa tsawon lokaci, wani ɓangare saboda kyawawan halaye na lafiya.[3][4]
  • Son jama’a ita ce sifar da ta fi daidaito wajen alaƙa da wanda yake fitowa a matsayin shugaba a cikin ƙungiyoyi.[5]
  • A matsakaici, masu son jama’a suna ba da rahoton ƙarin jin daɗin rai.[6]
  • Kuna saurin gina hanyar sadarwa da mutane, wanda yake taimakawa ga damammakin da suke zuwa ta hanyar shawarwarin mutane.
  • Kuna iya ba da ra’ayi mai kaifi, yin ciniki da ƙarfi da yanke shawarwarin da ba kowa ne yake so ba.
  • Ƙarancin sauƙin kai yana da alaƙa da samun kuɗi mafi yawa, musamman a wajen maza.[7]
  • Buɗaɗɗen tunani yana da alaƙa mai daidaito da nasarar ƙirƙira, a fasaha da kuma a kimiyya.[8]
  • Buɗaɗɗen tunani yana hasashen nasara a horo, wato koyo yayin aiki.[1]

Rauni da wuraren makanta na ENTJ-CM

  • Manyan ma’auni za su iya zama taurin kai idan tsare-tsare suka canza. Ku bar sarari a jadawalinku.
  • A wani bincike na fili, manajoji masu son jama’a sun sami sakamako mafi rauni wajen jagorantar ƙungiyoyi masu ƙwazo, saboda ba su buɗe kunne sosai ga ra’ayoyin ’yan ƙungiya ba.[9]
  • A wani binciken sayarwa, mutane masu matsakaicin son jama’a (“ambiverts”) sun fi sayarwa fiye da masu tsananin son jama’a, waɗanda wataƙila an ga kamar suna tilastawa.[10]
  • Ƙarancin sauƙin kai yana hasashen hanyoyi masu ɓarna a rashin jituwa.[11]
  • A yankuna 10 na duniya, ƙarancin sauƙin kai yana da alaƙa da rashin aminci a dangantaka.[12]
  • Kuna iya rasa sha’awa idan abu ya zama na yau da kullum. Ku tsara matakin kula da ayyuka tun da wuri.

Yadda sifofin ENTJ-CM suke haɗuwa

Bayanan haɗe-haɗe suna sa sakamakon bincike dabam-dabam gefe da gefe. Ba bincike ne dabam a kan wannan nau’i kansa ba.

  • Hasashe da horon kai: kuna samun sababbin ra’ayoyi kuma kuna aiwatar da su. Wannan haɗi ya dace da dogayen ayyukan ƙirƙira ko na bincike.[8][1]

Abin da haruffan -CM suke ƙara wa ENTJ a ƙarfi da rauni

C = Mai natsuwa (natsuwar zuciya), M = Mai tawali’u (gaskiya da tawali’u). Gwajin gargajiya na haruffa huɗu ba ya auna ko ɗaya daga cikinsu, amma duka biyu suna da muhimmanci a damuwa da ci gaba:

  • Natsuwar zuciya (ƙarancin saurin damuwa) ita ce alaƙa mafi ƙarfi tsakanin hali da gamsuwa da aiki.[13]
  • Ƙarancin saurin damuwa yana da alaƙa da ƙaramin haɗarin cututtukan fargaba da baƙin ciki mai tsanani (depression).[14]
  • Natsuwar zuciya tana da kyakkyawar alaƙa da shugabanci.[5]
  • Saboda yana da wuya a girgiza ku, wataƙila kuna yin watsi da damuwar wasu. Ya fi kyau ku tambaya maimakon ku yi zato.
  • Daga cikin manyan sifofi, gaskiya da tawali’u suna daga cikin masu hasashen halin adalci da haɗin kai mafi ƙarfi a wasannin tattalin arziki.[15]
  • Gaskiya da tawali’u su ne masu hasashe mafi ƙarfi a tsarin HEXACO na ƙarancin halaye marasa kyau a wurin aiki (sata, zagon ƙasa, ƙauracewa aiki).[16]
  • Wataƙila kuna raina nasarorinku ko guje wa tattaunawar ciniki. Kare kanku cikin adalci ba girman kai ba ne.
  • Wataƙila ladan matsayi (muƙamai, alawus-alawus) ba sa motsa ku. Ku zaɓi aikin da yake ba da ladan manufa ko farin cikin aikin da aka yi da kyau.

ENTJ-CM a ƙarƙashin damuwa: walwala da jure damuwa

  • Natsuwar zuciya tana daga cikin abubuwan hali mafi ƙarfi wajen hasashen walwala.[17]
  • Mutanen da suke da ƙarancin saurin damuwa ba sa yawan janyewa ko dogara da fatan banza idan suna cikin damuwa.[18]
  • Son jama’a yana daga cikin alaƙoƙi mafi ƙarfi tsakanin hali da jin daɗin rai da gamsuwa da rayuwa.[17]
  • Son jama’a yana da alaƙa da jure damuwa ta hanyar warware matsaloli da sake kallon yanayi ta fuska mafi kyau.[18]
  • Ƙwazo yana da kyakkyawar alaƙa da gamsuwa da rayuwa.[17]
  • Ƙwazo yana da alaƙa da jure damuwa ta hanyar warware matsaloli da ƙarancin guje wa abubuwa.[18]
  • Ƙarancin sauƙin kai yana da raunanniyar alaƙa ne kawai da ƙarancin walwala.[17]
  • Gabaɗaya, gaskiya da tawali’u suna da alaƙa da sakamako masu amfani ga al’umma da na ɗabi’a ta gari a fannoni da yawa na rayuwa.[19]
  • Buɗaɗɗen tunani yana da raunanniyar alaƙa ne kawai da gamsuwa da rayuwa gabaɗaya.[17]

Shawarwarin ci gaban kai ga ENTJ-CM

  • Ku saba da yin tambayoyi kafin ku faɗi ra’ayinku. Wannan yana taimakawa musamman a ƙungiyoyi masu ƙwazo.[9]
  • Ku haɗa ƙirƙirar ra’ayoyi da ranar ƙarshe ko da wanda zai taimaka muku ku kammala.
  • Kafin ku ƙalubalanci wani, ku taƙaita matsayinsa ta yadda shi kansa zai yarda da shi.
  • Ku tsara da gangan lokacin da babu wani shiri a cikinsa. Sassauci ma ƙwarewa ce.
  • Ku saba da faɗin yadda kuke ji a fili. Wasu za su iya ɗauka cewa natsuwarku sanyin rai ne.
  • Kafin kimanta aiki da tattaunawar ciniki, ku rubuta gudummawarku don kada tawali’unku ya ɓoye ta.
  • Sifofi suna iya canzawa. A wani gwaji bazuwa na shirin horarwa ta wayar salula na watanni uku, mutanen da suka so sauya wata sifa sun sauya fiye da rukunin kwatanci zuwa gefen da suke so, kuma yawancin sauyin ya ɗore a lokacin bibiya.[20]
  • A matsakaici, mutane suna ƙara natsuwar zuciya, sauƙin kai da ƙwazo yayin da suke girma.[21]

Yaya ƙarfin waɗannan sakamako yake?

  • Haruffa huɗu na gargajiya suna daidai da huɗu daga cikin sifofin Big Five (son jama’a, buɗaɗɗen tunani, sauƙin kai, ƙwazo), shi ya sa binciken Big Five ya shafe su.[22]
  • Alaƙoƙin da ke tsakanin sifofi da sakamako gaskiya ne amma kowanne ƙarami ne: alaƙar da aka saba gani tana kusan 0.10 zuwa 0.30, don haka sifofi suna sauya yiwuwa ne maimakon su yanke sakamako. Wani babban aikin maimaita bincike ya tabbatar da yawancin alaƙoƙin da aka gwada, yawanci da tasiri ɗan ƙasa.[23][24]

Layukan da ba su da majiya shawarwarin aiki ne ko bayanin sifofi, ba sakamakon bincike ba.

Shin ku ENTJ-CM ne da gaske?

Gwajin kyauta yana auna dukkan sifofi shida a matsayin percentile. Tambayoyi 62, kusan minti 8, ba rajista.

Ku yi gwajin kyauta

Shafukan da suka shafi wannan

Majiyoyi

  1. Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44(1), 1–26.
  2. Poropat, A. E. (2009). A meta-analysis of the five-factor model of personality and academic performance. Psychological Bulletin, 135(2), 322–338.
  3. Kern, M. L., & Friedman, H. S. (2008). Do conscientious individuals live longer? A quantitative review. Health Psychology, 27(5), 505–512.
  4. Bogg, T., & Roberts, B. W. (2004). Conscientiousness and health-related behaviors: A meta-analysis of the leading behavioral contributors to mortality. Psychological Bulletin, 130(6), 887–919.
  5. Judge, T. A., Bono, J. E., Ilies, R., & Gerhardt, M. W. (2002). Personality and leadership: A qualitative and quantitative review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 765–780.
  6. Lucas, R. E., & Fujita, F. (2000). Factors influencing the relation between extraversion and pleasant affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 1039–1056.
  7. Judge, T. A., Livingston, B. A., & Hurst, C. (2012). Do nice guys—and gals—really finish last? The joint effects of sex and agreeableness on income. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(2), 390–407.
  8. Feist, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(4), 290–309.
  9. Grant, A. M., Gino, F., & Hofmann, D. A. (2011). Reversing the extraverted leadership advantage: The role of employee proactivity. Academy of Management Journal, 54(3), 528–550.
  10. Grant, A. M. (2013). Rethinking the extraverted sales ideal: The ambivert advantage. Psychological Science, 24(6), 1024–1030.
  11. Jensen-Campbell, L. A., & Graziano, W. G. (2001). Agreeableness as a moderator of interpersonal conflict. Journal of Personality, 69(2), 323–362.
  12. Schmitt, D. P. (2004). The Big Five related to risky sexual behaviour across 10 world regions: Differential personality associations of sexual promiscuity and relationship infidelity. European Journal of Personality, 18(4), 301–319.
  13. Judge, T. A., Heller, D., & Mount, M. K. (2002). Five-factor model of personality and job satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 530–541.
  14. Kotov, R., Gamez, W., Schmidt, F., & Watson, D. (2010). Linking "big" personality traits to anxiety, depressive, and substance use disorders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136(5), 768–821.
  15. Thielmann, I., Spadaro, G., & Balliet, D. (2020). Personality and prosocial behavior: A theoretical framework and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 146(1), 30–90.
  16. Pletzer, J. L., Bentvelzen, M., Oostrom, J. K., & de Vries, R. E. (2019). A meta-analysis of the relations between personality and workplace deviance: Big Five versus HEXACO. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 112, 369–383.
  17. Steel, P., Schmidt, J., & Shultz, J. (2008). Refining the relationship between personality and subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 134(1), 138–161.
  18. Connor-Smith, J. K., & Flachsbart, C. (2007). Relations between personality and coping: A meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(6), 1080–1107.
  19. Zettler, I., Thielmann, I., Hilbig, B. E., & Moshagen, M. (2020). The nomological net of the HEXACO model of personality: A large-scale meta-analytic investigation. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(3), 723–760.
  20. Stieger, M., Flückiger, C., Rüegger, D., Kowatsch, T., Roberts, B. W., & Allemand, M. (2021). Changing personality traits with the help of a digital personality change intervention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(8), e2017548118.
  21. Roberts, B. W., Walton, K. E., & Viechtbauer, W. (2006). Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 132(1), 1–25.
  22. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1989). Reinterpreting the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator from the perspective of the five-factor model of personality. Journal of Personality, 57(1), 17–40.
  23. Soto, C. J. (2019). How replicable are links between personality traits and consequential life outcomes? The Life Outcomes of Personality Replication Project. Psychological Science, 30(5), 711–727.
  24. Ozer, D. J., & Benet-Martínez, V. (2006). Personality and the prediction of consequential outcomes. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 401–421.