Fara gwajin
Menu
Ku yi gwajin kyauta
Harshe

Gida › Nau’i da nau’i › ENTJ vs ENTP

ENTJ vs ENTP

ENTJ ko ENTP: yadda za a bambanta su

ENTJ da ENTP suna tarayya a haruffa uku cikin huɗu (E mai son jama’a, N mai hasashe da T mai tsauri) kuma sun bambanta ne kawai a Ƙwazo: ENTJ mai tsari ne (J), ENTP kuma mai sassauci ne (P). Wannan harafi guda shi ne dukkan tambayar, kuma ga duk wanda yake kusa da tsakiyar wannan sifa amsar gaskiya zai iya zama “kaɗan daga duka biyu”.

ENTJ · Jagora

Mai son jama’a, mai hangen nesa, mai yanke shawara, mai himma.

Kuna da tsayuwa kan ra’ayi a gaban jama’a, ra’ayoyi suna motsa ku, kuna magana kai tsaye kuma kuna da tsari sosai. Kuna son jagoranci, kafa manufofi na dogon lokaci da tura abubuwa har su kai ga sakamako. Son jama’a da ƙwazo duka suna da alaƙa da wanda yake fitowa a matsayin shugaba.

ENTP · Mai Ƙirƙira

Mai kuzari, mai fasaha, mai son muhawara, mai yin abu nan take.

Kuna jin daɗin mutane da ra’ayoyi daidai wa daida, kuma kuna son muhawara, tara ra’ayoyi tare da ƙalubalantar al’ada. Kuna barin hanyoyi da yawa a buɗe, kuna fara abubuwa da yawa kuma sababbin abubuwa sun fi ba ku kuzari fiye da abin da aka saba.

Yadda za a zaɓa tsakanin ENTJ da ENTP

  1. Ku ajiye haruffa uku da suke tarayya a kai a yanzu. Tambaya ɗaya kawai ita ce J/P: kun fi zama mai tsari ko mai sassauci?
  2. Ku bi tambayoyin tunani da ke ƙasa kuma ku ƙirga gefen da kuke karkata. Idan ya kusa daidai, wataƙila kuna kusa da tsakiyar sifar, kuma shafukan biyu za su bayyana ku a wani ɓangare.
  3. Ku yi gwajin da yake ba da percentile maimakon harafi kawai, kuma ku duba makinku na Ƙwazo. Idan ya yi nisa da percentile na 50, harafin yana da ma’ana; idan yana cikin maki 10 daga gare shi, ku ɗauki kanku a tsakiya.
  4. Ku tambayi wanda ya san ku sosai wane bayani ya dace da ku. Sau da yawa wasu mutane suna ganin waɗannan ɗabi’u na yau da kullum fiye da mu.

Harafi ɗaya da ya bambanta: J ko P (Ƙwazo)

Ƙwazo (Conscientiousness) na Big Five: tsari, jajircewa, horon kai da kasancewa abin dogaro. Yana daidai da harafin J/P (J = ƙwazo mafi yawa). Alaƙarsa da MBTI matsakaiciya ce.

ENTJ
J · Mai tsari

Kuna tsarawa, ana iya dogara da ku kuma kuna lura da ƙananan bayanai, kuma kuna son kammala abin da kuka fara.

ENTP
P · Mai sassauci

Kuna yin abu nan take kuma kuna saurin sabawa da yanayi. Kuna son barin hanyoyi a buɗe kuma kuna aiki ta hanyar fashewar kuzari.

Yadda yake bayyana a yau da kullum

Bayanin abin da sifar take, ba sakamakon bincike ba.

Aiki da sana’a
  • ENTJ (J): Wataƙila kuna tsarawa tun da wuri, kuna cika alkawari kuma kun fi son bayyanannun ranakun ƙarshe da nauye-nauye.
  • ENTP (P): Wataƙila kuna aiki ta hanyar fashewar kuzari, kuna saurin sabawa da sauyi kuma kun fi son abubuwa dabam-dabam fiye da tsayayyun al’adu.
Soyayya da dangantaka
  • ENTJ (J): Wataƙila kuna son tsare-tsaren tare da hasashen abubuwa, kuma kuna nuna jajircewa ta hanyar cika ƙananan alkawura.
  • ENTP (P): Wataƙila kuna kawo yin abu nan take da nishaɗi, kuma wataƙila kuna ƙin dangantaka mai cike da jadawali.
Abota
  • ENTJ (J): Wataƙila ku ne kuke tunawa da ranakun haihuwa, kuke sa ranar haɗuwa kuma kuke zuwa a kan lokaci.
  • ENTP (P): Wataƙila zama da ku yana da sauƙi kuma kuna shirye don shirin ƙarshe na minti, ko da yake ba kwa saurin bibiya.
Ƙarfi, rauni da ci gaba
  • ENTJ (J): Horon kai yana sa a kammala abubuwa. Ƙalubalen shi ne ku kasance masu sassauci idan tsare-tsare suka zama dole a sauya su.
  • ENTP (P): Saurin sabawa dukiya ce. Ƙalubalen shi ne gina tsari daidai wanda zai isa ku kammala abin da yake da muhimmanci a gare ku.

Abin da bincike ya danganta da kowane gefe

J · Mai tsari (ENTJ)
  • Daga cikin sifofin hali, ƙwazo shi ne mai hasashen ƙwazon aiki mafi daidaito a dukkan rukunonin ayyukan da aka bincika.[3]
  • A makarantar sakandare da jami’a, yana da alaƙa da makin karatu da ƙarfi kamar basira.[4]
  • A matsakaici, mutane masu yawan ƙwazo suna rayuwa tsawon lokaci, wani ɓangare saboda kyawawan halaye na lafiya.[5][6]
  • Ƙwazo yana da alaƙa da sha’awar ayyukan tsari (bayanai, matakai, daidaito).[7]
P · Mai sassauci (ENTP)
  • Ƙarancin ƙwazo yana da alaƙa da jinkirta abubuwa da halaye masu haɗari ga lafiya (abinci, motsa jiki, shaye-shaye).[8][6]
  • A dukkan ayyuka, ƙarancin ƙwazo a matsakaici yana hasashen ƙarancin ƙwazon aiki.[3]
  • A yankuna 10 na duniya, ƙarancin ƙwazo yana da alaƙa da rashin aminci a dangantaka. Bayyanannun yarjejeniyoyi suna taimakawa.[9]
  • Ƙwazon masoyi yana da alaƙa da gamsuwa: cika ƙananan alkawura yana da muhimmanci.[10]

Matsakaita ne a cikin mutane da yawa. Tasiri irin wannan gaskiya ne amma yawanci ƙarami ne, don haka yana sauya yiwuwa ga rukuni kuma yana faɗin kaɗan game da kowane mutum guda.

Dalilin da ya sa mutane suke rikita J da P

  • Ƙwazo yakan ƙaru daga farkon girma zuwa tsakiyar shekaru, don haka P na kan iyaka a shekarunku na samartaka ko ashirin zai iya komawa J daga baya.[1]
  • Ma’aunin gargajiya na J/P yana daidai ne kawai a matsakaici da ƙwazo na Big Five, wanda shi ne abin da wannan harafi yake auna a nan. Idan wani gwaji ya ba ku nau’i dabam, wannan yana daga cikin haruffan da suka fi yiwuwar saɓawa.[2]
  • Ku amsa bisa abin da kuke yi da gaske, ba abin da kuke niyyar yi ba. Tsare-tsare, tsafta, kiyaye lokaci da cika aiki duk suna cikin sifar, don haka ku duba yanayin gabaɗaya maimakon ɗabi’a ɗaya.
Tambayoyin tunani don J ko P (tambayoyin da za a yi tunani a kai, ba gwaji ko maki ba)
  • Shin wurin aikinku, akwatin imel ko kalandarku yawanci suna cikin tsari (J), ko kuna tafiyar da abubuwa lafiya cikin ɗan hargitsi (P)?
  • Idan ranar ƙarshe tana da sauran makonni biyu, kuna farawa da wuri kuma ku tafi a hankali (J), ko kuna yin yawancin aikin kusa da ranar ƙarshe (P)?
  • A tafiya, kuna son shiri na kowace rana (J), ko kun fi son yanke shawara yayin da kuke tafiya (P)?
  • Shin kuna cika ƙananan alkawura (mayar da kira, aika fayil) a kan lokaci ba tare da tunatarwa ba (J), ko sau da yawa suna zamewa (P)?
  • Shin ayyukan da ba a gama ba suna damun ku har sai an kammala su (J), ko za ku iya barin abubuwa a buɗe ba tare da damuwa sosai ba (P)?
  • Shin kuna rubuta jerin ayyuka kuma kuna bi da su da gaske (J), ko kun fi son bin kuzarinku na ranar (P)?

Ku amsa bisa abin da kuke yawan yi, ba abin da kuke son yi ba. Idan amsoshinku sun rabu daidai, wataƙila kuna kusa da tsakiya a wannan sifa.

Abin da ENTJ da ENTP suke tarayya a kai

Waɗannan haruffa uku ne suke sa nau’o’in biyu su yi kama sosai a karatu. Ko wane nau’i ne ku, waɗannan sassan bayanan duka biyu ya kamata su dace da ku.

Son jama’a
E · Mai son jama’a

Mutane suna ba ku kuzari, kuna magana cikin sauƙi kuma kuna saurin shiga hira.

Buɗaɗɗen tunani
N · Mai hasashe

Kuna son bincike kuma kuna da hasashe, kuma kuna jin daɗin ra’ayoyi marasa zahiri, ka’idoji da sababbin abubuwa.

Sauƙin kai
T · Mai tsauri

Kuna magana kai tsaye, kuna da shakka kuma kuna son gasa, kuma kuna sa gaskiya da sakamako a gaban jituwa.

Dalilin da ya sa sakamakonku zai iya juyawa tsakanin ENTJ da ENTP

  • Sifofin hali suna ci gaba kuma yawancin mutane suna samun maki kusa da tsakiya. Rarrabuwar maki tana da nauyi a tsakiya, ba a raba ta zuwa sansani biyu ba, har a ma’aunan gargajiya na haruffa huɗu.[2][11]
  • Don haka ƙaramin kuskuren awo na yau da kullum ya isa ya juya harafi ga duk wanda yake kusa da layin rabuwa. Rashin daidaiton nau’i idan aka sake gwaji yana daga cikin manyan sukar da aka wallafa game da gwaje-gwajen nau’i masu haruffa huɗu.[12]
  • Makin da ke ƙasa yana da daidaito sosai; raba maki mai ci gaba zuwa akwatuna biyu ne yake sa haruffan su zama marasa tabbas.[13]
  • ENTJ ko ENTP ya dogara ne da harafi ɗaya, don haka idan kuna kusa da tsakiyar Ƙwazo, samun kowane sakamako a ranaku dabam-dabam abin tsammani ne, ba alamar cewa wani gwaji ya lalace ba.
  • A gwajin 64 Types, ana ba da rahoton kowace sifa a matsayin percentile idan aka kwatanta da amsoshi na gaske. Duk sifar da take cikin maki 10 daga percentile na 50 ana yi mata alamar kan iyaka, kuma ana nuna muku lambar da za ku samu idan aka juya wannan harafi. Bisa ma’ana, kashi 20% na mutane suna tsakanin percentile na 40 da na 60 a kowace sifa.
  • Sauyi na gaske ma yana da muhimmanci: a matsakaici mutane suna ƙara ƙwazo tsakanin shekaru 20 zuwa 40, don haka sakamakon J/P zai iya sauyawa a cikin shekaru saboda dalilan da ba su da alaƙa da gwajin.[1]

ENTJ da ENTP a aiki da soyayya

Bambance-bambancen da ke sama sun fi bayyana a aiki da dangantaka. Don hoton sana’a, ga fannonin sha’awa uku da kowane nau’i yakan fi karkata zuwa gare su, da yadda haruffan da suka bambanta suke karkatar da su:

ENTJ

Karkatar sha’awa da aka saba gani: Na fasaha, Na kasuwanci, Na bincike

ENTP

Karkatar sha’awa da aka saba gani: Na fasaha, Na kasuwanci, Na bincike

  • J ko P: gefen J (ENTJ) yana da alaƙa da ƙarin sha’awar aikin tsari (bayanai, matakai, daidaito) fiye da gefen P (ENTP).[7]

Waɗannan karkatar sha’awa sun fito ne daga alaƙoƙin nazarce-nazarce tsakanin Big Five da sha’awar sana’a. Alaƙoƙin matsakaita ne, don haka auna sha’awa kai tsaye ya fi hasashensu daga nau’i.[7]

Aiki da sana’a
ENTJ a wurin aiki · ENTP a wurin aiki
Soyayya da dangantaka
ENTJ a soyayya · ENTP a soyayya
Abota
ENTJ a abota · ENTP a abota
Ƙarfi, rauni da ci gaba
ENTJ: ƙarfi da rauni · ENTP: ƙarfi da rauni
Ku gano wanda kuke: ku yi gwajin kyauta

Gwajin 64 Types yana ba ku percentile a kowace sifa, yana yi wa haruffan kan iyaka alama, kuma yana ƙara sifofi biyu da gwaje-gwajen haruffa huɗu suke rasawa. Tambayoyi 62, kusan minti 8, ba rajista.

Ku yi gwajin kyauta

Tambayoyin da ake yawan yi

Mene ne bambanci tsakanin ENTJ da ENTP?

Sun bambanta ne kawai a Ƙwazo. ENTJ J ne (mai tsari): kuna tsarawa, ana iya dogara da ku kuma kuna lura da ƙananan bayanai, kuma kuna son kammala abin da kuka fara. ENTP P ne (mai sassauci): kuna yin abu nan take kuma kuna saurin sabawa da yanayi. Kuna son barin hanyoyi a buɗe kuma kuna aiki ta hanyar fashewar kuzari. Duka biyu suna tarayya a E (mai son jama’a), N (mai hasashe) da T (mai tsauri).

Ta yaya zan san ko ni ENTJ ne ko ENTP?

Ku mai da hankali ne kawai kan harafin da suka bambanta (J/P). Ku yi tunani kan abin da kuke yi da gaske a yanayi na yau da kullum, ku tambayi wanda ya san ku sosai, kuma ku yi gwajin da yake ba da percentile na kowace sifa maimakon harafi kawai. Idan sifa ta fito kusa da percentile na 50, kuna kusa da matsakaici a cikinta kuma nau’o’in biyu za su bayyana ku a wani ɓangare.

Me ya sa nake samun ENTJ a wani gwaji da ENTP a wani?

Sifofin hali suna ci gaba kuma yawancin mutane suna samun maki kusa da tsakiya, don haka ƙananan bambance-bambance a yadda kuke amsawa za su iya juya harafi. Sauyin nau’i idan aka sake gwaji yana daga cikin matsalolin gwaje-gwajen haruffa huɗu da aka fi rubutawa. Tun da ENTJ da ENTP sun bambanta da harafi ɗaya, wataƙila kuna kusa da tsakiyar Ƙwazo.

Shin ENTJ da ENTP sun dace da juna?

Wannan tambaya ce dabam da wanda kuke. A manyan bincike, kamanceceniyar halin masoya biyu ba ta bayyana kusan komai ba bayan sifofin kowannensu; natsuwar zuciya, sauƙin kai da ƙwazo na kowane masoyi sun fi muhimmanci. Shafin dacewar ENTJ da ENTP yana bayani kan soyayya, abota da aiki ga wannan haɗi.

Shin mutum zai iya zama ENTJ da ENTP duka?

Ta wata fuska, ee. Idan makinku na Ƙwazo yana kusa da matsakaici, kuna tsakanin nau’o’in biyu, kuma duka bayanan za su dace da ku a wani ɓangare. Kusan mutum ɗaya cikin biyar yana samun maki tsakanin percentile na 40 da na 60 a kowace sifa, shi ya sa gwajin 64 Types yake yi wa waɗannan haruffa alamar kan iyaka.

Binciken dacewa da aka ambata a sama: kamanceceniya ta bayyana kaɗan ne bayan sifofin kowane masoyi[14]; sifofin kowane masoyi sun fi muhimmanci.[10]

Ku zurfafa

Bayanin ENTJ · Bayanin ENTP · Dacewar ENTJ da ENTP

Kwatance makamantan wannan

ENTJ vs INTJ · bambanci a son jama’aENTJ vs ESTJ · bambanci a buɗaɗɗen tunaniENFJ vs ENTJ · bambanci a sauƙin kaiENTP vs INTP · bambanci a son jama’aENTP vs ESTP · bambanci a buɗaɗɗen tunaniENFP vs ENTP · bambanci a sauƙin kai

Dukkan kwatancen nau’o’i

Majiyoyi

  1. Roberts, B. W., Walton, K. E., & Viechtbauer, W. (2006). Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 132(1), 1–25.
  2. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1989). Reinterpreting the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator from the perspective of the five-factor model of personality. Journal of Personality, 57(1), 17–40.
  3. Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44(1), 1–26.
  4. Poropat, A. E. (2009). A meta-analysis of the five-factor model of personality and academic performance. Psychological Bulletin, 135(2), 322–338.
  5. Kern, M. L., & Friedman, H. S. (2008). Do conscientious individuals live longer? A quantitative review. Health Psychology, 27(5), 505–512.
  6. Bogg, T., & Roberts, B. W. (2004). Conscientiousness and health-related behaviors: A meta-analysis of the leading behavioral contributors to mortality. Psychological Bulletin, 130(6), 887–919.
  7. Larson, L. M., Rottinghaus, P. J., & Borgen, F. H. (2002). Meta-analyses of Big Six interests and Big Five personality factors. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61(2), 217–239.
  8. Steel, P. (2007). The nature of procrastination: A meta-analytic and theoretical review of quintessential self-regulatory failure. Psychological Bulletin, 133(1), 65–94.
  9. Schmitt, D. P. (2004). The Big Five related to risky sexual behaviour across 10 world regions: Differential personality associations of sexual promiscuity and relationship infidelity. European Journal of Personality, 18(4), 301–319.
  10. Malouff, J. M., Thorsteinsson, E. B., Schutte, N. S., Bhullar, N., & Rooke, S. E. (2010). The five-factor model of personality and relationship satisfaction of intimate partners: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 44(1), 124–127.
  11. Bess, T. L., & Harvey, R. J. (2002). Bimodal score distributions and the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator: Fact or artifact? Journal of Personality Assessment, 78(1), 176–186.
  12. Pittenger, D. J. (2005). Cautionary comments regarding the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 57(3), 210–221.
  13. Capraro, R. M., & Capraro, M. M. (2002). Myers-Briggs Type Indicator score reliability across studies: A meta-analytic reliability generalization study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 62(4), 590–602.
  14. Dyrenforth, P. S., Kashy, D. A., Donnellan, M. B., & Lucas, R. E. (2010). Predicting relationship and life satisfaction from personality in nationally representative samples from three countries: The relative importance of actor, partner, and similarity effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(4), 690–702.