Fara gwajin
Menu
Ku yi gwajin kyauta
Harshe

Gida › Nau’i da nau’i › INTP vs ISTJ

INTP vs ISTJ

INTP ko ISTJ: yadda za a bambanta su

INTP da ISTJ suna tarayya a haruffa biyu (I mai son kaɗaici da T mai tsauri) kuma sun bambanta a Buɗaɗɗen tunani da Ƙwazo. Don zaɓar tsakaninsu, kuna buƙatar warware duka waɗannan haruffa biyu, kuma kowanne tambaya ce dabam.

INTP · Mai Nazari

Mai shiru, mai bincike, mai shakka, mai sassauci.

Matsaloli da ka’idoji marasa zahiri suna jan hankalinku, kuma kuna jin daɗin tambayar abubuwan da ake ɗauka a matsayin gaskiya. Kun fi son tsari mara tsauri da lokacin yin tunani ku kaɗai, kuma kun fi damuwa da samun abu daidai fiye da faranta wa kowa rai.

ISTJ · Mai Gudanarwa

Mai shiru, mai aiki da zahiri, mai magana kai tsaye, abin dogaro.

Kuna da shiru, ƙafafunku suna ƙasa, kuna da gaskiya kuma kuna da tsari sosai. Kuna amincewa da hanyoyin da aka tabbatar, kuna cika abin da kuka yi alkawari, kuma kun fi son dokoki da nauye-nauye bayyanannu.

Yadda za a zaɓa tsakanin INTP da ISTJ

  1. Ku warware harafi ɗaya a lokaci ɗaya. INTP da ISTJ sun bambanta a N/S da J/P, kuma kowanne tambaya ce dabam.
  2. Ku fara da harafin da kuka fi rashin tabbaci a kansa kuma ku yi amfani da tambayoyin tunaninsa da ke ƙasa.
  3. Idan kuna gefe ɗaya a fili a wasu haruffa kuma a tsakiya a wasu, wataƙila wani nau’i na uku ya fi dacewa da ku fiye da waɗannan biyu. Ku gwada kwatancen da aka haɗa a ƙasan shafin.
  4. Gwajin da yake ba da percentile yana nuna waɗanne haruffanku ne bayyanannu da waɗanda suke kan iyaka. Bayyanannu ne suka fi bayyana ku.

Bambanci: N ko S (Buɗaɗɗen tunani)

Buɗaɗɗen tunani ga sabon abu (Openness to Experience) na Big Five (wanda aka auna a nan a matsayin hikima da hasashe): son bincike, ƙirƙira, sha’awar ra’ayoyi da tunani marar zahiri. Yana daidai da harafin N/S, wanda yake da alaƙa mai ƙarfi da buɗaɗɗen tunani na Big Five.

INTP
N · Mai hasashe

Kuna son bincike kuma kuna da hasashe, kuma kuna jin daɗin ra’ayoyi marasa zahiri, ka’idoji da sababbin abubuwa.

ISTJ
S · Mai aiki da zahiri

Kun fi son abubuwa na zahiri, waɗanda aka tabbatar kuma masu amfani, kuma kuna amincewa da gogewa fiye da ka’ida.

Yadda yake bayyana a yau da kullum

Bayanin abin da sifar take, ba sakamakon bincike ba.

Aiki da sana’a
  • INTP (N): Wataƙila ra’ayoyi, tsare-tsare da damammaki suna jan hankalinku, kuma kuna gajiya idan aiki ya zama maimaitawa kawai.
  • ISTJ (S): Wataƙila kun fi son ayyuka na zahiri masu sakamakon da ake gani, kuma kuna amincewa da hanyoyin da aka riga aka tabbatar suna aiki.
Soyayya da dangantaka
  • INTP (N): Wataƙila kuna jin daɗin tattauna ra’ayoyi, tsare-tsare da ma’anar rayuwa da masoyi, kuma kuna daraja sababbin abubuwa a abubuwan da kuke yi tare.
  • ISTJ (S): Wataƙila kuna nuna soyayya ta hanyar taimako na zahiri da al’adun yau da kullum masu dogaro fiye da manyan nune-nune ko dogayen hirarraki marasa zahiri.

Abin da bincike ya danganta da kowane gefe

N · Mai hasashe (INTP)
  • Buɗaɗɗen tunani yana da alaƙa mai daidaito da nasarar ƙirƙira, a fasaha da kuma a kimiyya.[1]
  • Buɗaɗɗen tunani yana hasashen nasara a horo, wato koyo yayin aiki.[2]
  • Buɗaɗɗen tunani yana da alaƙa mafi ƙarfi tsakanin hali da sha’awa: da sha’awar fasaha. Yana da alaƙa kuma da sha’awar bincike.[3]
S · Mai aiki da zahiri (ISTJ)
  • Buɗaɗɗen tunani yana hasashen nasara a horo. A fannonin da suke sauyawa da sauri, ku yi tsammanin ƙarin ƙoƙarin koyo.[2]
  • Ƙarancin buɗaɗɗen tunani yana da alaƙa da ƙarancin sha’awar ayyukan fasaha da na bincike. Sau da yawa matsayi na zahiri, na aikin hannu da masu bin ƙa’idoji sun fi dacewa.[3]
  • A matsakaici, bambance-bambancen buɗaɗɗen tunani tsakanin masoya suna da ƙaramin tasiri a kan gamsuwa.[4][5]

Matsakaita ne a cikin mutane da yawa. Tasiri irin wannan gaskiya ne amma yawanci ƙarami ne, don haka yana sauya yiwuwa ga rukuni kuma yana faɗin kaɗan game da kowane mutum guda.

Dalilin da ya sa mutane suke rikita N da S

  • N ba game da yawan basirarku ba ne. Yana bayyana yadda ra’ayoyi, hasashe da sababbin abubuwa suke jan hankalinku. Mutane masu ƙwarewa sosai da yawa sun fi son abubuwa na zahiri da aka tabbatar.
  • Aiki zai iya rikitar da wannan harafi: wanda yake aikin fasaha zai iya sarrafa abubuwa marasa zahiri duk rana amma kuma ya fi son abubuwa na zahiri da sanannu a lokacin hutunsa. Ku amsa bisa abin da kuke nema lokacin da babu wanda ya tilasta muku.
Tambayoyin tunani don N ko S (tambayoyin da za a yi tunani a kai, ba gwaji ko maki ba)
  • Idan kuka ji sabon ra’ayi, kuna jin daɗin bin abubuwan da zai haifar da “in da a ce” (N), ko kuna fara son sanin ko yana aiki a zahiri (S)?
  • Shin tattaunawa marasa zahiri game da ka’idoji, falsafa ko hasashe tana burge ku saboda kanta (N), ko tana kama da ɓata lokaci daga matsaloli na gaske (S)?
  • Wajen koyon sabon abu, kuna son ƙa’idar da ke ƙasa da farko (N), ko misali na zahiri da za ku iya yin atisaye a kai (S)?
  • Shin sau da yawa kuna nutsewa cikin mafarkin rana, yanayin da kuka ƙaga ko ra’ayoyin abubuwan da ba su wanzu ba tukuna (N), ko hankalinku galibi yana kan abin da ke gabanku (S)?

Ku amsa bisa abin da kuke yawan yi, ba abin da kuke son yi ba. Idan amsoshinku sun rabu daidai, wataƙila kuna kusa da tsakiya a wannan sifa.

Bambanci: P ko J (Ƙwazo)

Ƙwazo (Conscientiousness) na Big Five: tsari, jajircewa, horon kai da kasancewa abin dogaro. Yana daidai da harafin J/P (J = ƙwazo mafi yawa). Alaƙarsa da MBTI matsakaiciya ce.

INTP
P · Mai sassauci

Kuna yin abu nan take kuma kuna saurin sabawa da yanayi. Kuna son barin hanyoyi a buɗe kuma kuna aiki ta hanyar fashewar kuzari.

ISTJ
J · Mai tsari

Kuna tsarawa, ana iya dogara da ku kuma kuna lura da ƙananan bayanai, kuma kuna son kammala abin da kuka fara.

Yadda yake bayyana a yau da kullum

Bayanin abin da sifar take, ba sakamakon bincike ba.

Aiki da sana’a
  • INTP (P): Wataƙila kuna aiki ta hanyar fashewar kuzari, kuna saurin sabawa da sauyi kuma kun fi son abubuwa dabam-dabam fiye da tsayayyun al’adu.
  • ISTJ (J): Wataƙila kuna tsarawa tun da wuri, kuna cika alkawari kuma kun fi son bayyanannun ranakun ƙarshe da nauye-nauye.
Soyayya da dangantaka
  • INTP (P): Wataƙila kuna kawo yin abu nan take da nishaɗi, kuma wataƙila kuna ƙin dangantaka mai cike da jadawali.
  • ISTJ (J): Wataƙila kuna son tsare-tsaren tare da hasashen abubuwa, kuma kuna nuna jajircewa ta hanyar cika ƙananan alkawura.

Abin da bincike ya danganta da kowane gefe

P · Mai sassauci (INTP)
  • Ƙarancin ƙwazo yana da alaƙa da jinkirta abubuwa da halaye masu haɗari ga lafiya (abinci, motsa jiki, shaye-shaye).[8][9]
  • A dukkan ayyuka, ƙarancin ƙwazo a matsakaici yana hasashen ƙarancin ƙwazon aiki.[2]
  • A yankuna 10 na duniya, ƙarancin ƙwazo yana da alaƙa da rashin aminci a dangantaka. Bayyanannun yarjejeniyoyi suna taimakawa.[10]
J · Mai tsari (ISTJ)
  • Daga cikin sifofin hali, ƙwazo shi ne mai hasashen ƙwazon aiki mafi daidaito a dukkan rukunonin ayyukan da aka bincika.[2]
  • A makarantar sakandare da jami’a, yana da alaƙa da makin karatu da ƙarfi kamar basira.[11]
  • A matsakaici, mutane masu yawan ƙwazo suna rayuwa tsawon lokaci, wani ɓangare saboda kyawawan halaye na lafiya.[12][9]

Matsakaita ne a cikin mutane da yawa. Tasiri irin wannan gaskiya ne amma yawanci ƙarami ne, don haka yana sauya yiwuwa ga rukuni kuma yana faɗin kaɗan game da kowane mutum guda.

Dalilin da ya sa mutane suke rikita P da J

  • Ƙwazo yakan ƙaru daga farkon girma zuwa tsakiyar shekaru, don haka P na kan iyaka a shekarunku na samartaka ko ashirin zai iya komawa J daga baya.[6]
  • Ma’aunin gargajiya na J/P yana daidai ne kawai a matsakaici da ƙwazo na Big Five, wanda shi ne abin da wannan harafi yake auna a nan. Idan wani gwaji ya ba ku nau’i dabam, wannan yana daga cikin haruffan da suka fi yiwuwar saɓawa.[7]
Tambayoyin tunani don P ko J (tambayoyin da za a yi tunani a kai, ba gwaji ko maki ba)
  • Shin wurin aikinku, akwatin imel ko kalandarku yawanci suna cikin tsari (J), ko kuna tafiyar da abubuwa lafiya cikin ɗan hargitsi (P)?
  • Idan ranar ƙarshe tana da sauran makonni biyu, kuna farawa da wuri kuma ku tafi a hankali (J), ko kuna yin yawancin aikin kusa da ranar ƙarshe (P)?
  • A tafiya, kuna son shiri na kowace rana (J), ko kun fi son yanke shawara yayin da kuke tafiya (P)?
  • Shin kuna cika ƙananan alkawura (mayar da kira, aika fayil) a kan lokaci ba tare da tunatarwa ba (J), ko sau da yawa suna zamewa (P)?

Ku amsa bisa abin da kuke yawan yi, ba abin da kuke son yi ba. Idan amsoshinku sun rabu daidai, wataƙila kuna kusa da tsakiya a wannan sifa.

Abin da INTP da ISTJ suke tarayya a kai

Haruffan da ke ƙasa su ne abin tarayya. Ko wane nau’i ne ku, waɗannan sassan bayanan duka biyu ya kamata su dace da ku.

Son jama’a
I · Mai son kaɗaici

Kun fi son ƙananan taruka da wurare masu natsuwa, kuma yawanci kuna tunani kafin ku yi magana. Son kaɗaici ba ɗaya yake da jin kunya ko damuwa ba. Waɗannan suna cikin wata sifa dabam (natsuwar zuciya).

Sauƙin kai
T · Mai tsauri

Kuna magana kai tsaye, kuna da shakka kuma kuna son gasa, kuma kuna sa gaskiya da sakamako a gaban jituwa.

Dalilin da ya sa sakamakonku zai iya juyawa tsakanin INTP da ISTJ

  • Sifofin hali suna ci gaba kuma yawancin mutane suna samun maki kusa da tsakiya. Rarrabuwar maki tana da nauyi a tsakiya, ba a raba ta zuwa sansani biyu ba, har a ma’aunan gargajiya na haruffa huɗu.[7][13]
  • Don haka ƙaramin kuskuren awo na yau da kullum ya isa ya juya harafi ga duk wanda yake kusa da layin rabuwa. Rashin daidaiton nau’i idan aka sake gwaji yana daga cikin manyan sukar da aka wallafa game da gwaje-gwajen nau’i masu haruffa huɗu.[14]
  • Makin da ke ƙasa yana da daidaito sosai; raba maki mai ci gaba zuwa akwatuna biyu ne yake sa haruffan su zama marasa tabbas.[15]
  • Samun INTP wani lokaci da ISTJ wani lokaci yana nufin haruffa biyu sun canza tsakanin gwaje-gwaje. Kowane harafi yana juyawa da kansa, don haka wannan yawanci yana nufin wasu daga cikin sifofinku suna kusa da matsakaici, ko kun amsa kuna tunanin yanayi dabam-dabam (aiki ko gida, mako mai kyau ko marar kyau).
  • A gwajin 64 Types, ana ba da rahoton kowace sifa a matsayin percentile idan aka kwatanta da amsoshi na gaske. Duk sifar da take cikin maki 10 daga percentile na 50 ana yi mata alamar kan iyaka, kuma ana nuna muku lambar da za ku samu idan aka juya wannan harafi. Bisa ma’ana, kashi 20% na mutane suna tsakanin percentile na 40 da na 60 a kowace sifa.
  • Sauyi na gaske ma yana da muhimmanci: a matsakaici mutane suna ƙara ƙwazo tsakanin shekaru 20 zuwa 40, don haka sakamakon J/P zai iya sauyawa a cikin shekaru saboda dalilan da ba su da alaƙa da gwajin.[6]

INTP da ISTJ a aiki da soyayya

Bambance-bambancen da ke sama sun fi bayyana a aiki da dangantaka. Don hoton sana’a, ga fannonin sha’awa uku da kowane nau’i yakan fi karkata zuwa gare su, da yadda haruffan da suka bambanta suke karkatar da su:

INTP

Karkatar sha’awa da aka saba gani: Na fasaha, Na bincike, Na zahiri

ISTJ

Karkatar sha’awa da aka saba gani: Na tsari, Na zahiri, Na bincike

  • N ko S: gefen N (INTP) yana da alaƙa da ƙarin sha’awar aikin fasaha da bincike fiye da gefen S (ISTJ).[3]
  • P ko J: gefen J (ISTJ) yana da alaƙa da ƙarin sha’awar aikin tsari (bayanai, matakai, daidaito) fiye da gefen P (INTP).[3]

Waɗannan karkatar sha’awa sun fito ne daga alaƙoƙin nazarce-nazarce tsakanin Big Five da sha’awar sana’a. Alaƙoƙin matsakaita ne, don haka auna sha’awa kai tsaye ya fi hasashensu daga nau’i.[3]

Aiki da sana’a
INTP a wurin aiki · ISTJ a wurin aiki
Soyayya da dangantaka
INTP a soyayya · ISTJ a soyayya
Abota
INTP a abota · ISTJ a abota
Ƙarfi, rauni da ci gaba
INTP: ƙarfi da rauni · ISTJ: ƙarfi da rauni
Ku gano wanda kuke: ku yi gwajin kyauta

Gwajin 64 Types yana ba ku percentile a kowace sifa, yana yi wa haruffan kan iyaka alama, kuma yana ƙara sifofi biyu da gwaje-gwajen haruffa huɗu suke rasawa. Tambayoyi 62, kusan minti 8, ba rajista.

Ku yi gwajin kyauta

Tambayoyin da ake yawan yi

Mene ne bambanci tsakanin INTP da ISTJ?

Sun bambanta a haruffa biyu: Buɗaɗɗen tunani (INTP N, ISTJ S); Ƙwazo (INTP P, ISTJ J). Suna tarayya a I (mai son kaɗaici) da T (mai tsauri). Kowane harafi sifa ce dabam mai ci gaba, don haka bambance-bambancen suna taruwa ne maimakon su samar da irin mutane biyu kafaffu.

Ta yaya zan san ko ni INTP ne ko ISTJ?

Ku mai da hankali ne kawai kan haruffan da suka bambanta (N/S da J/P). Ku yi tunani kan abin da kuke yi da gaske a yanayi na yau da kullum, ku tambayi wanda ya san ku sosai, kuma ku yi gwajin da yake ba da percentile na kowace sifa maimakon harafi kawai. Idan sifa ta fito kusa da percentile na 50, kuna kusa da matsakaici a cikinta kuma nau’o’in biyu za su bayyana ku a wani ɓangare.

Me ya sa nake samun INTP a wani gwaji da ISTJ a wani?

Sifofin hali suna ci gaba kuma yawancin mutane suna samun maki kusa da tsakiya, don haka ƙananan bambance-bambance a yadda kuke amsawa za su iya juya harafi. Sauyin nau’i idan aka sake gwaji yana daga cikin matsalolin gwaje-gwajen haruffa huɗu da aka fi rubutawa. Tun da INTP da ISTJ sun bambanta da haruffa biyu, wataƙila kuna kusa da tsakiya a sifofi da dama, ko kun amsa kuna tunanin yanayi dabam-dabam.

Shin INTP da ISTJ sun dace da juna?

Wannan tambaya ce dabam da wanda kuke. A manyan bincike, kamanceceniyar halin masoya biyu ba ta bayyana kusan komai ba bayan sifofin kowannensu; natsuwar zuciya, sauƙin kai da ƙwazo na kowane masoyi sun fi muhimmanci. Shafin dacewar INTP da ISTJ yana bayani kan soyayya, abota da aiki ga wannan haɗi.

Binciken dacewa da aka ambata a sama: kamanceceniya ta bayyana kaɗan ne bayan sifofin kowane masoyi[5]; sifofin kowane masoyi sun fi muhimmanci.[4]

Ku zurfafa

Bayanin INTP · Bayanin ISTJ · Dacewar INTP da ISTJ

Kwatance makamantan wannan

ENTP vs INTP · bambanci a son jama’aINTP vs ISTP · bambanci a buɗaɗɗen tunaniINFP vs INTP · bambanci a sauƙin kaiINTJ vs INTP · bambanci a ƙwazoESTJ vs ISTJ · bambanci a son jama’aINTJ vs ISTJ · bambanci a buɗaɗɗen tunaniISFJ vs ISTJ · bambanci a sauƙin kaiISTJ vs ISTP · bambanci a ƙwazo

Dukkan kwatancen nau’o’i

Majiyoyi

  1. Feist, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(4), 290–309.
  2. Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44(1), 1–26.
  3. Larson, L. M., Rottinghaus, P. J., & Borgen, F. H. (2002). Meta-analyses of Big Six interests and Big Five personality factors. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61(2), 217–239.
  4. Malouff, J. M., Thorsteinsson, E. B., Schutte, N. S., Bhullar, N., & Rooke, S. E. (2010). The five-factor model of personality and relationship satisfaction of intimate partners: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 44(1), 124–127.
  5. Dyrenforth, P. S., Kashy, D. A., Donnellan, M. B., & Lucas, R. E. (2010). Predicting relationship and life satisfaction from personality in nationally representative samples from three countries: The relative importance of actor, partner, and similarity effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(4), 690–702.
  6. Roberts, B. W., Walton, K. E., & Viechtbauer, W. (2006). Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 132(1), 1–25.
  7. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1989). Reinterpreting the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator from the perspective of the five-factor model of personality. Journal of Personality, 57(1), 17–40.
  8. Steel, P. (2007). The nature of procrastination: A meta-analytic and theoretical review of quintessential self-regulatory failure. Psychological Bulletin, 133(1), 65–94.
  9. Bogg, T., & Roberts, B. W. (2004). Conscientiousness and health-related behaviors: A meta-analysis of the leading behavioral contributors to mortality. Psychological Bulletin, 130(6), 887–919.
  10. Schmitt, D. P. (2004). The Big Five related to risky sexual behaviour across 10 world regions: Differential personality associations of sexual promiscuity and relationship infidelity. European Journal of Personality, 18(4), 301–319.
  11. Poropat, A. E. (2009). A meta-analysis of the five-factor model of personality and academic performance. Psychological Bulletin, 135(2), 322–338.
  12. Kern, M. L., & Friedman, H. S. (2008). Do conscientious individuals live longer? A quantitative review. Health Psychology, 27(5), 505–512.
  13. Bess, T. L., & Harvey, R. J. (2002). Bimodal score distributions and the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator: Fact or artifact? Journal of Personality Assessment, 78(1), 176–186.
  14. Pittenger, D. J. (2005). Cautionary comments regarding the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 57(3), 210–221.
  15. Capraro, R. M., & Capraro, M. M. (2002). Myers-Briggs Type Indicator score reliability across studies: A meta-analytic reliability generalization study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 62(4), 590–602.