Fara gwajin
Menu
Ku yi gwajin kyauta
Harshe

Gida › Nau’i da nau’i › INFP vs INTP

INFP vs INTP

INFP ko INTP: yadda za a bambanta su

INFP da INTP suna tarayya a haruffa uku cikin huɗu (I mai son kaɗaici, N mai hasashe da P mai sassauci) kuma sun bambanta ne kawai a Sauƙin kai: INFP mai tausayi ne (F), INTP kuma mai tsauri ne (T). Wannan harafi guda shi ne dukkan tambayar, kuma ga duk wanda yake kusa da tsakiyar wannan sifa amsar gaskiya zai iya zama “kaɗan daga duka biyu”.

INFP · Mai Mafarki

Mai taushi, mai hasashe, mai jin abin da wasu suke ji, mara takura.

Kuna da hasashe, kirki kuma kuna karkata ga cikin kanku, tare da wadataccen tunani na ciki. Kun fi son sassauci fiye da tsauraran tsare-tsare, kuma kuna yin aiki mafi kyau idan ya shafi wani abu da kuke kula da shi.

INTP · Mai Nazari

Mai shiru, mai bincike, mai shakka, mai sassauci.

Matsaloli da ka’idoji marasa zahiri suna jan hankalinku, kuma kuna jin daɗin tambayar abubuwan da ake ɗauka a matsayin gaskiya. Kun fi son tsari mara tsauri da lokacin yin tunani ku kaɗai, kuma kun fi damuwa da samun abu daidai fiye da faranta wa kowa rai.

Yadda za a zaɓa tsakanin INFP da INTP

  1. Ku ajiye haruffa uku da suke tarayya a kai a yanzu. Tambaya ɗaya kawai ita ce F/T: kun fi zama mai tausayi ko mai tsauri?
  2. Ku bi tambayoyin tunani da ke ƙasa kuma ku ƙirga gefen da kuke karkata. Idan ya kusa daidai, wataƙila kuna kusa da tsakiyar sifar, kuma shafukan biyu za su bayyana ku a wani ɓangare.
  3. Ku yi gwajin da yake ba da percentile maimakon harafi kawai, kuma ku duba makinku na Sauƙin kai. Idan ya yi nisa da percentile na 50, harafin yana da ma’ana; idan yana cikin maki 10 daga gare shi, ku ɗauki kanku a tsakiya.
  4. Ku tambayi wanda ya san ku sosai wane bayani ya dace da ku. Sau da yawa wasu mutane suna ganin waɗannan ɗabi’u na yau da kullum fiye da mu.

Harafi ɗaya da ya bambanta: F ko T (Sauƙin kai)

Sauƙin kai (Agreeableness) na Big Five: tausayi, karimci, amincewa da wasu da shirin haɗa kai. Yana daidai da harafin F/T (F = sauƙin kai mafi yawa). Alaƙarsa da MBTI matsakaiciya ce.

INFP
F · Mai tausayi

Kuna da karimci, kulawa da taimako, kuma kuna la’akari da yadda wasu suke ji.

INTP
T · Mai tsauri

Kuna magana kai tsaye, kuna da shakka kuma kuna son gasa, kuma kuna sa gaskiya da sakamako a gaban jituwa.

Yadda yake bayyana a yau da kullum

Bayanin abin da sifar take, ba sakamakon bincike ba.

Aiki da sana’a
  • INFP (F): Wataƙila kuna lura da yadda shawarwari suke shafar mutane kuma kuna daraja yanayin haɗin kai a ƙungiya.
  • INTP (T): Wataƙila kuna gabatar da hankali, ma’auni da sakamako, kuma ba ku jin nauyin faɗin gaskiya mai ɗaci.
Soyayya da dangantaka
  • INFP (F): Wataƙila kuna lura da yadda masoyinku yake ji kuma kuna karkata ga sassautawa don kiyaye zaman lafiya.
  • INTP (T): Wataƙila kun fi daraja gaskiya fiye da kwantar da hankali, kuma kuna iya nuna kulawa ta hanyar warware matsaloli maimakon nuna tausayi.
Abota
  • INFP (F): Wataƙila abokai suna zuwa wajenku don neman goyon baya da kunne mai tausayi.
  • INTP (T): Wataƙila ku ne abokin da yake faɗin abin da wasu suke tunani, kuma kuna daraja abokan da za su iya jure gaskiya.
Ƙarfi, rauni da ci gaba
  • INFP (F): Kirki yana gina aminci da sauri. Ƙalubalen shi ne ku faɗi buƙatunku kafin ɓacin rai ya taru.
  • INTP (T): Gaskiya tana da amfani. Ƙalubalen shi ne tabbatar da cewa ana karɓarta a matsayin taimako, ba hari ba.

Abin da bincike ya danganta da kowane gefe

F · Mai tausayi (INFP)
  • Mutane masu yawan sauƙin kai suna amfani da hanyoyi masu gina jiki a rikici, kuma ba kasafai suke ƙara rura shi ba.[3]
  • Ana yawan zaɓar mutane masu yawan sauƙin kai a matsayin abokai.[4]
  • Sauƙin kai yana da alaƙa ta kishiyar juna da samun kuɗi, kuma tasirin ya fi girma a wajen maza.[5]
  • Sauƙin kai yana da alaƙa da sha’awar zamantakewa (koyarwa, taimako, hidima).[6]
T · Mai tsauri (INTP)
  • Ƙarancin sauƙin kai yana da alaƙa da samun kuɗi mafi yawa, musamman a wajen maza.[5]
  • Ƙarancin sauƙin kai yana hasashen hanyoyi masu ɓarna a rashin jituwa.[3]
  • A yankuna 10 na duniya, ƙarancin sauƙin kai yana da alaƙa da rashin aminci a dangantaka.[7]
  • A matsakaici, masu kafa kamfani suna da ɗan ƙarancin sauƙin kai fiye da manajoji.[8]

Matsakaita ne a cikin mutane da yawa. Tasiri irin wannan gaskiya ne amma yawanci ƙarami ne, don haka yana sauya yiwuwa ga rukuni kuma yana faɗin kaɗan game da kowane mutum guda.

Dalilin da ya sa mutane suke rikita F da T

  • Ladabi ko gaskiya ba ɗaya suke da F ba. Tsarin HEXACO yana bambanta sauƙin kai (kirki, haƙuri, yafiya) da gaskiya da tawali’u (gaskiya da adalci), don haka mai magana kai tsaye zai iya zama mai cikakken adalci, kuma mai iya ɗaukar hankali zai iya zama mai dabara.[1]
  • Ma’aunin gargajiya na T/F yana daidai ne kawai a matsakaici da sauƙin kai na Big Five, wanda shi ne abin da wannan harafi yake auna a nan. Idan wani gwaji ya ba ku nau’i dabam, wannan yana daga cikin haruffan da suka fi yiwuwar saɓawa.[2]
  • T ba yana nufin mafi hankali ko marar ji ba ne, kuma F ba yana nufin marar hankali ba ne. Sifar game da kirki, amincewa da haɗin kai ce, ko kuma gaskiya kai tsaye, shakka da son gasa.
Tambayoyin tunani don F ko T (tambayoyin da za a yi tunani a kai, ba gwaji ko maki ba)
  • Idan aboki ya nuna muku aikin da yake da matsaloli a fili, tunaninku na farko shi ne ku kare yadda yake ji (F) ko ku faɗi matsalolin a fili (T)?
  • A saɓani, kuna neman abin da kuka yarda a kai (F), ko kuna ci gaba da matsawa har sai hujja mafi ƙarfi ta yi nasara (T)?
  • Kuna yawan ɗauka cewa mutane suna da kyakkyawar niyya har sai an nuna akasin haka (F), ko kuna jira sai sun cancanci amincewarku (T)?
  • Idan wani ya ɓata rai da ku, yana daɗewa a zuciyarku (F), ko za ku iya ƙyale shi idan kuna ganin ku ne kuke da gaskiya (T)?
  • A ciniki, shin matsawa sosai don gefenku yana jin ba daɗi (F) ko a sauƙaƙe (T)?
  • Idan wata shawara za ta ɓata wa wani rai, kuna ba da nauyi sosai ga yadda yake ji (F), ko kuna mai da hankali kan ko shawarar daidai ce (T)?

Ku amsa bisa abin da kuke yawan yi, ba abin da kuke son yi ba. Idan amsoshinku sun rabu daidai, wataƙila kuna kusa da tsakiya a wannan sifa.

Abin da INFP da INTP suke tarayya a kai

Waɗannan haruffa uku ne suke sa nau’o’in biyu su yi kama sosai a karatu. Ko wane nau’i ne ku, waɗannan sassan bayanan duka biyu ya kamata su dace da ku.

Son jama’a
I · Mai son kaɗaici

Kun fi son ƙananan taruka da wurare masu natsuwa, kuma yawanci kuna tunani kafin ku yi magana. Son kaɗaici ba ɗaya yake da jin kunya ko damuwa ba. Waɗannan suna cikin wata sifa dabam (natsuwar zuciya).

Buɗaɗɗen tunani
N · Mai hasashe

Kuna son bincike kuma kuna da hasashe, kuma kuna jin daɗin ra’ayoyi marasa zahiri, ka’idoji da sababbin abubuwa.

Ƙwazo
P · Mai sassauci

Kuna yin abu nan take kuma kuna saurin sabawa da yanayi. Kuna son barin hanyoyi a buɗe kuma kuna aiki ta hanyar fashewar kuzari.

Dalilin da ya sa sakamakonku zai iya juyawa tsakanin INFP da INTP

  • Sifofin hali suna ci gaba kuma yawancin mutane suna samun maki kusa da tsakiya. Rarrabuwar maki tana da nauyi a tsakiya, ba a raba ta zuwa sansani biyu ba, har a ma’aunan gargajiya na haruffa huɗu.[2][9]
  • Don haka ƙaramin kuskuren awo na yau da kullum ya isa ya juya harafi ga duk wanda yake kusa da layin rabuwa. Rashin daidaiton nau’i idan aka sake gwaji yana daga cikin manyan sukar da aka wallafa game da gwaje-gwajen nau’i masu haruffa huɗu.[10]
  • Makin da ke ƙasa yana da daidaito sosai; raba maki mai ci gaba zuwa akwatuna biyu ne yake sa haruffan su zama marasa tabbas.[11]
  • INFP ko INTP ya dogara ne da harafi ɗaya, don haka idan kuna kusa da tsakiyar Sauƙin kai, samun kowane sakamako a ranaku dabam-dabam abin tsammani ne, ba alamar cewa wani gwaji ya lalace ba.
  • A gwajin 64 Types, ana ba da rahoton kowace sifa a matsayin percentile idan aka kwatanta da amsoshi na gaske. Duk sifar da take cikin maki 10 daga percentile na 50 ana yi mata alamar kan iyaka, kuma ana nuna muku lambar da za ku samu idan aka juya wannan harafi. Bisa ma’ana, kashi 20% na mutane suna tsakanin percentile na 40 da na 60 a kowace sifa.

INFP da INTP a aiki da soyayya

Bambance-bambancen da ke sama sun fi bayyana a aiki da dangantaka. Don hoton sana’a, ga fannonin sha’awa uku da kowane nau’i yakan fi karkata zuwa gare su, da yadda haruffan da suka bambanta suke karkatar da su:

INFP

Karkatar sha’awa da aka saba gani: Na fasaha, Na bincike, Na zahiri

INTP

Karkatar sha’awa da aka saba gani: Na fasaha, Na bincike, Na zahiri

  • F ko T: gefen F (INFP) yana da alaƙa da ƙarin sha’awar aikin zamantakewa (taimako, koyarwa, kulawa) fiye da gefen T (INTP).[6]

Waɗannan karkatar sha’awa sun fito ne daga alaƙoƙin nazarce-nazarce tsakanin Big Five da sha’awar sana’a. Alaƙoƙin matsakaita ne, don haka auna sha’awa kai tsaye ya fi hasashensu daga nau’i.[6]

Aiki da sana’a
INFP a wurin aiki · INTP a wurin aiki
Soyayya da dangantaka
INFP a soyayya · INTP a soyayya
Abota
INFP a abota · INTP a abota
Ƙarfi, rauni da ci gaba
INFP: ƙarfi da rauni · INTP: ƙarfi da rauni
Ku gano wanda kuke: ku yi gwajin kyauta

Gwajin 64 Types yana ba ku percentile a kowace sifa, yana yi wa haruffan kan iyaka alama, kuma yana ƙara sifofi biyu da gwaje-gwajen haruffa huɗu suke rasawa. Tambayoyi 62, kusan minti 8, ba rajista.

Ku yi gwajin kyauta

Tambayoyin da ake yawan yi

Mene ne bambanci tsakanin INFP da INTP?

Sun bambanta ne kawai a Sauƙin kai. INFP F ne (mai tausayi): kuna da karimci, kulawa da taimako, kuma kuna la’akari da yadda wasu suke ji. INTP T ne (mai tsauri): kuna magana kai tsaye, kuna da shakka kuma kuna son gasa, kuma kuna sa gaskiya da sakamako a gaban jituwa. Duka biyu suna tarayya a I (mai son kaɗaici), N (mai hasashe) da P (mai sassauci).

Ta yaya zan san ko ni INFP ne ko INTP?

Ku mai da hankali ne kawai kan harafin da suka bambanta (F/T). Ku yi tunani kan abin da kuke yi da gaske a yanayi na yau da kullum, ku tambayi wanda ya san ku sosai, kuma ku yi gwajin da yake ba da percentile na kowace sifa maimakon harafi kawai. Idan sifa ta fito kusa da percentile na 50, kuna kusa da matsakaici a cikinta kuma nau’o’in biyu za su bayyana ku a wani ɓangare.

Me ya sa nake samun INFP a wani gwaji da INTP a wani?

Sifofin hali suna ci gaba kuma yawancin mutane suna samun maki kusa da tsakiya, don haka ƙananan bambance-bambance a yadda kuke amsawa za su iya juya harafi. Sauyin nau’i idan aka sake gwaji yana daga cikin matsalolin gwaje-gwajen haruffa huɗu da aka fi rubutawa. Tun da INFP da INTP sun bambanta da harafi ɗaya, wataƙila kuna kusa da tsakiyar Sauƙin kai.

Shin INFP da INTP sun dace da juna?

Wannan tambaya ce dabam da wanda kuke. A manyan bincike, kamanceceniyar halin masoya biyu ba ta bayyana kusan komai ba bayan sifofin kowannensu; natsuwar zuciya, sauƙin kai da ƙwazo na kowane masoyi sun fi muhimmanci. Shafin dacewar INFP da INTP yana bayani kan soyayya, abota da aiki ga wannan haɗi.

Shin mutum zai iya zama INFP da INTP duka?

Ta wata fuska, ee. Idan makinku na Sauƙin kai yana kusa da matsakaici, kuna tsakanin nau’o’in biyu, kuma duka bayanan za su dace da ku a wani ɓangare. Kusan mutum ɗaya cikin biyar yana samun maki tsakanin percentile na 40 da na 60 a kowace sifa, shi ya sa gwajin 64 Types yake yi wa waɗannan haruffa alamar kan iyaka.

Binciken dacewa da aka ambata a sama: kamanceceniya ta bayyana kaɗan ne bayan sifofin kowane masoyi[12]; sifofin kowane masoyi sun fi muhimmanci.[13]

Ku zurfafa

Bayanin INFP · Bayanin INTP · Dacewar INFP da INTP

Kwatance makamantan wannan

ENFP vs INFP · bambanci a son jama’aINFP vs ISFP · bambanci a buɗaɗɗen tunaniINFJ vs INFP · bambanci a ƙwazoENTP vs INTP · bambanci a son jama’aINTP vs ISTP · bambanci a buɗaɗɗen tunaniINTJ vs INTP · bambanci a ƙwazo

Dukkan kwatancen nau’o’i

Majiyoyi

  1. Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2007). Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11(2), 150–166.
  2. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1989). Reinterpreting the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator from the perspective of the five-factor model of personality. Journal of Personality, 57(1), 17–40.
  3. Jensen-Campbell, L. A., & Graziano, W. G. (2001). Agreeableness as a moderator of interpersonal conflict. Journal of Personality, 69(2), 323–362.
  4. Selfhout, M., Burk, W., Branje, S., Denissen, J., van Aken, M., & Meeus, W. (2010). Emerging late adolescent friendship networks and Big Five personality traits: A social network approach. Journal of Personality, 78(2), 509–538.
  5. Judge, T. A., Livingston, B. A., & Hurst, C. (2012). Do nice guys—and gals—really finish last? The joint effects of sex and agreeableness on income. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(2), 390–407.
  6. Larson, L. M., Rottinghaus, P. J., & Borgen, F. H. (2002). Meta-analyses of Big Six interests and Big Five personality factors. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61(2), 217–239.
  7. Schmitt, D. P. (2004). The Big Five related to risky sexual behaviour across 10 world regions: Differential personality associations of sexual promiscuity and relationship infidelity. European Journal of Personality, 18(4), 301–319.
  8. Zhao, H., & Seibert, S. E. (2006). The Big Five personality dimensions and entrepreneurial status: A meta-analytical review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(2), 259–271.
  9. Bess, T. L., & Harvey, R. J. (2002). Bimodal score distributions and the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator: Fact or artifact? Journal of Personality Assessment, 78(1), 176–186.
  10. Pittenger, D. J. (2005). Cautionary comments regarding the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 57(3), 210–221.
  11. Capraro, R. M., & Capraro, M. M. (2002). Myers-Briggs Type Indicator score reliability across studies: A meta-analytic reliability generalization study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 62(4), 590–602.
  12. Dyrenforth, P. S., Kashy, D. A., Donnellan, M. B., & Lucas, R. E. (2010). Predicting relationship and life satisfaction from personality in nationally representative samples from three countries: The relative importance of actor, partner, and similarity effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(4), 690–702.
  13. Malouff, J. M., Thorsteinsson, E. B., Schutte, N. S., Bhullar, N., & Rooke, S. E. (2010). The five-factor model of personality and relationship satisfaction of intimate partners: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 44(1), 124–127.