Fara gwajin
Menu
Ku yi gwajin kyauta
Harshe

Gida › Nau’i da nau’i › INTP vs ISTP

INTP vs ISTP

INTP ko ISTP: yadda za a bambanta su

INTP da ISTP suna tarayya a haruffa uku cikin huɗu (I mai son kaɗaici, T mai tsauri da P mai sassauci) kuma sun bambanta ne kawai a Buɗaɗɗen tunani: INTP mai hasashe ne (N), ISTP kuma mai aiki da zahiri ne (S). Wannan harafi guda shi ne dukkan tambayar, kuma ga duk wanda yake kusa da tsakiyar wannan sifa amsar gaskiya zai iya zama “kaɗan daga duka biyu”.

INTP · Mai Nazari

Mai shiru, mai bincike, mai shakka, mai sassauci.

Matsaloli da ka’idoji marasa zahiri suna jan hankalinku, kuma kuna jin daɗin tambayar abubuwan da ake ɗauka a matsayin gaskiya. Kun fi son tsari mara tsauri da lokacin yin tunani ku kaɗai, kuma kun fi damuwa da samun abu daidai fiye da faranta wa kowa rai.

ISTP · Gwanin Hannu

Mai shiru, gwanin aikin hannu, mai cin gashin kai, mai saurin sabawa.

Kuna da shiru, kuna aiki da zahiri, kuna da gaskiya kuma kuna da sassauci. Kuna son fahimtar yadda abubuwa suke aiki ta hanyar yin aiki da su, kuna ƙirƙirar mafita nan take kuma kuna kare ’yancinku.

Yadda za a zaɓa tsakanin INTP da ISTP

  1. Ku ajiye haruffa uku da suke tarayya a kai a yanzu. Tambaya ɗaya kawai ita ce N/S: kun fi zama mai hasashe ko mai aiki da zahiri?
  2. Ku bi tambayoyin tunani da ke ƙasa kuma ku ƙirga gefen da kuke karkata. Idan ya kusa daidai, wataƙila kuna kusa da tsakiyar sifar, kuma shafukan biyu za su bayyana ku a wani ɓangare.
  3. Ku yi gwajin da yake ba da percentile maimakon harafi kawai, kuma ku duba makinku na Buɗaɗɗen tunani. Idan ya yi nisa da percentile na 50, harafin yana da ma’ana; idan yana cikin maki 10 daga gare shi, ku ɗauki kanku a tsakiya.
  4. Ku tambayi wanda ya san ku sosai wane bayani ya dace da ku. Sau da yawa wasu mutane suna ganin waɗannan ɗabi’u na yau da kullum fiye da mu.

Harafi ɗaya da ya bambanta: N ko S (Buɗaɗɗen tunani)

Buɗaɗɗen tunani ga sabon abu (Openness to Experience) na Big Five (wanda aka auna a nan a matsayin hikima da hasashe): son bincike, ƙirƙira, sha’awar ra’ayoyi da tunani marar zahiri. Yana daidai da harafin N/S, wanda yake da alaƙa mai ƙarfi da buɗaɗɗen tunani na Big Five.

INTP
N · Mai hasashe

Kuna son bincike kuma kuna da hasashe, kuma kuna jin daɗin ra’ayoyi marasa zahiri, ka’idoji da sababbin abubuwa.

ISTP
S · Mai aiki da zahiri

Kun fi son abubuwa na zahiri, waɗanda aka tabbatar kuma masu amfani, kuma kuna amincewa da gogewa fiye da ka’ida.

Yadda yake bayyana a yau da kullum

Bayanin abin da sifar take, ba sakamakon bincike ba.

Aiki da sana’a
  • INTP (N): Wataƙila ra’ayoyi, tsare-tsare da damammaki suna jan hankalinku, kuma kuna gajiya idan aiki ya zama maimaitawa kawai.
  • ISTP (S): Wataƙila kun fi son ayyuka na zahiri masu sakamakon da ake gani, kuma kuna amincewa da hanyoyin da aka riga aka tabbatar suna aiki.
Soyayya da dangantaka
  • INTP (N): Wataƙila kuna jin daɗin tattauna ra’ayoyi, tsare-tsare da ma’anar rayuwa da masoyi, kuma kuna daraja sababbin abubuwa a abubuwan da kuke yi tare.
  • ISTP (S): Wataƙila kuna nuna soyayya ta hanyar taimako na zahiri da al’adun yau da kullum masu dogaro fiye da manyan nune-nune ko dogayen hirarraki marasa zahiri.
Abota
  • INTP (N): Hirarrakin da suke shiga cikin ra’ayoyi, littattafai, ka’idoji ko tsare-tsare wataƙila su ne abin da kuka fi daraja a wajen abokai.
  • ISTP (S): Ayyukan da kuke yi tare da taimaka wa juna wataƙila su ne mannen abotarku.
Ƙarfi, rauni da ci gaba
  • INTP (N): Son bincike yana sa koyo ya yi muku sauƙi. Ƙalubalen shi ne ku tsaya da ra’ayi har ya ratsa tsakiyarsa mara armashi.
  • ISTP (S): Kallon zahiri yana sa ƙafafunku su kasance a ƙasa. Ƙalubalen shi ne ku ba sababbin hanyoyi dama ta adalci, ƙaramar gwaji, kafin ku ƙi su.

Abin da bincike ya danganta da kowane gefe

N · Mai hasashe (INTP)
  • Buɗaɗɗen tunani yana da alaƙa mai daidaito da nasarar ƙirƙira, a fasaha da kuma a kimiyya.[2]
  • Buɗaɗɗen tunani yana hasashen nasara a horo, wato koyo yayin aiki.[3]
  • Buɗaɗɗen tunani yana da alaƙa mafi ƙarfi tsakanin hali da sha’awa: da sha’awar fasaha. Yana da alaƙa kuma da sha’awar bincike.[4]
  • A nazarce-nazarce, buɗaɗɗen tunani kusan ba shi da alaƙa da gamsuwar masoyi. Son bincike na tare batun ɗanɗano ne, ba mai hasashen dacewa ba.[5]
S · Mai aiki da zahiri (ISTP)
  • Buɗaɗɗen tunani yana hasashen nasara a horo. A fannonin da suke sauyawa da sauri, ku yi tsammanin ƙarin ƙoƙarin koyo.[3]
  • Ƙarancin buɗaɗɗen tunani yana da alaƙa da ƙarancin sha’awar ayyukan fasaha da na bincike. Sau da yawa matsayi na zahiri, na aikin hannu da masu bin ƙa’idoji sun fi dacewa.[4]
  • A matsakaici, bambance-bambancen buɗaɗɗen tunani tsakanin masoya suna da ƙaramin tasiri a kan gamsuwa.[5][6]
  • Buɗaɗɗen tunani yana da raunanniyar alaƙa ne kawai da gamsuwa da rayuwa. Kasancewa mai aiki da zahiri ba ya rage walwalarku.[7]

Matsakaita ne a cikin mutane da yawa. Tasiri irin wannan gaskiya ne amma yawanci ƙarami ne, don haka yana sauya yiwuwa ga rukuni kuma yana faɗin kaɗan game da kowane mutum guda.

Dalilin da ya sa mutane suke rikita N da S

  • N ba game da yawan basirarku ba ne. Yana bayyana yadda ra’ayoyi, hasashe da sababbin abubuwa suke jan hankalinku. Mutane masu ƙwarewa sosai da yawa sun fi son abubuwa na zahiri da aka tabbatar.
  • Aiki zai iya rikitar da wannan harafi: wanda yake aikin fasaha zai iya sarrafa abubuwa marasa zahiri duk rana amma kuma ya fi son abubuwa na zahiri da sanannu a lokacin hutunsa. Ku amsa bisa abin da kuke nema lokacin da babu wanda ya tilasta muku.
  • Ma’aunin N/S yana daidai sosai da buɗaɗɗen tunani na Big Five, don haka yana daga cikin haruffan da suka fi daidaito a gwaje-gwaje dabam-dabam.[1]
Tambayoyin tunani don N ko S (tambayoyin da za a yi tunani a kai, ba gwaji ko maki ba)
  • Idan kuka ji sabon ra’ayi, kuna jin daɗin bin abubuwan da zai haifar da “in da a ce” (N), ko kuna fara son sanin ko yana aiki a zahiri (S)?
  • Shin tattaunawa marasa zahiri game da ka’idoji, falsafa ko hasashe tana burge ku saboda kanta (N), ko tana kama da ɓata lokaci daga matsaloli na gaske (S)?
  • Wajen koyon sabon abu, kuna son ƙa’idar da ke ƙasa da farko (N), ko misali na zahiri da za ku iya yin atisaye a kai (S)?
  • Shin sau da yawa kuna nutsewa cikin mafarkin rana, yanayin da kuka ƙaga ko ra’ayoyin abubuwan da ba su wanzu ba tukuna (N), ko hankalinku galibi yana kan abin da ke gabanku (S)?
  • Idan wata hanya tana aiki tuni, kuna son gwada wata hanya dabam duk da haka (N), ko kuna farin ciki da ci gaba da abin da aka tabbatar (S)?
  • Shin kuna neman littattafai, fasaha ko ra’ayoyi a wajen fanninku saboda kawai suna da ban sha’awa (N), ko galibi idan suna da amfani (S)?

Ku amsa bisa abin da kuke yawan yi, ba abin da kuke son yi ba. Idan amsoshinku sun rabu daidai, wataƙila kuna kusa da tsakiya a wannan sifa.

Abin da INTP da ISTP suke tarayya a kai

Waɗannan haruffa uku ne suke sa nau’o’in biyu su yi kama sosai a karatu. Ko wane nau’i ne ku, waɗannan sassan bayanan duka biyu ya kamata su dace da ku.

Son jama’a
I · Mai son kaɗaici

Kun fi son ƙananan taruka da wurare masu natsuwa, kuma yawanci kuna tunani kafin ku yi magana. Son kaɗaici ba ɗaya yake da jin kunya ko damuwa ba. Waɗannan suna cikin wata sifa dabam (natsuwar zuciya).

Sauƙin kai
T · Mai tsauri

Kuna magana kai tsaye, kuna da shakka kuma kuna son gasa, kuma kuna sa gaskiya da sakamako a gaban jituwa.

Ƙwazo
P · Mai sassauci

Kuna yin abu nan take kuma kuna saurin sabawa da yanayi. Kuna son barin hanyoyi a buɗe kuma kuna aiki ta hanyar fashewar kuzari.

Dalilin da ya sa sakamakonku zai iya juyawa tsakanin INTP da ISTP

  • Sifofin hali suna ci gaba kuma yawancin mutane suna samun maki kusa da tsakiya. Rarrabuwar maki tana da nauyi a tsakiya, ba a raba ta zuwa sansani biyu ba, har a ma’aunan gargajiya na haruffa huɗu.[1][8]
  • Don haka ƙaramin kuskuren awo na yau da kullum ya isa ya juya harafi ga duk wanda yake kusa da layin rabuwa. Rashin daidaiton nau’i idan aka sake gwaji yana daga cikin manyan sukar da aka wallafa game da gwaje-gwajen nau’i masu haruffa huɗu.[9]
  • Makin da ke ƙasa yana da daidaito sosai; raba maki mai ci gaba zuwa akwatuna biyu ne yake sa haruffan su zama marasa tabbas.[10]
  • INTP ko ISTP ya dogara ne da harafi ɗaya, don haka idan kuna kusa da tsakiyar Buɗaɗɗen tunani, samun kowane sakamako a ranaku dabam-dabam abin tsammani ne, ba alamar cewa wani gwaji ya lalace ba.
  • A gwajin 64 Types, ana ba da rahoton kowace sifa a matsayin percentile idan aka kwatanta da amsoshi na gaske. Duk sifar da take cikin maki 10 daga percentile na 50 ana yi mata alamar kan iyaka, kuma ana nuna muku lambar da za ku samu idan aka juya wannan harafi. Bisa ma’ana, kashi 20% na mutane suna tsakanin percentile na 40 da na 60 a kowace sifa.

INTP da ISTP a aiki da soyayya

Bambance-bambancen da ke sama sun fi bayyana a aiki da dangantaka. Don hoton sana’a, ga fannonin sha’awa uku da kowane nau’i yakan fi karkata zuwa gare su, da yadda haruffan da suka bambanta suke karkatar da su:

INTP

Karkatar sha’awa da aka saba gani: Na fasaha, Na bincike, Na zahiri

ISTP

Karkatar sha’awa da aka saba gani: Na zahiri, Na tsari, Na bincike

  • N ko S: gefen N (INTP) yana da alaƙa da ƙarin sha’awar aikin fasaha da bincike fiye da gefen S (ISTP).[4]

Waɗannan karkatar sha’awa sun fito ne daga alaƙoƙin nazarce-nazarce tsakanin Big Five da sha’awar sana’a. Alaƙoƙin matsakaita ne, don haka auna sha’awa kai tsaye ya fi hasashensu daga nau’i.[4]

Aiki da sana’a
INTP a wurin aiki · ISTP a wurin aiki
Soyayya da dangantaka
INTP a soyayya · ISTP a soyayya
Abota
INTP a abota · ISTP a abota
Ƙarfi, rauni da ci gaba
INTP: ƙarfi da rauni · ISTP: ƙarfi da rauni
Ku gano wanda kuke: ku yi gwajin kyauta

Gwajin 64 Types yana ba ku percentile a kowace sifa, yana yi wa haruffan kan iyaka alama, kuma yana ƙara sifofi biyu da gwaje-gwajen haruffa huɗu suke rasawa. Tambayoyi 62, kusan minti 8, ba rajista.

Ku yi gwajin kyauta

Tambayoyin da ake yawan yi

Mene ne bambanci tsakanin INTP da ISTP?

Sun bambanta ne kawai a Buɗaɗɗen tunani. INTP N ne (mai hasashe): kuna son bincike kuma kuna da hasashe, kuma kuna jin daɗin ra’ayoyi marasa zahiri, ka’idoji da sababbin abubuwa. ISTP S ne (mai aiki da zahiri): kun fi son abubuwa na zahiri, waɗanda aka tabbatar kuma masu amfani, kuma kuna amincewa da gogewa fiye da ka’ida. Duka biyu suna tarayya a I (mai son kaɗaici), T (mai tsauri) da P (mai sassauci).

Ta yaya zan san ko ni INTP ne ko ISTP?

Ku mai da hankali ne kawai kan harafin da suka bambanta (N/S). Ku yi tunani kan abin da kuke yi da gaske a yanayi na yau da kullum, ku tambayi wanda ya san ku sosai, kuma ku yi gwajin da yake ba da percentile na kowace sifa maimakon harafi kawai. Idan sifa ta fito kusa da percentile na 50, kuna kusa da matsakaici a cikinta kuma nau’o’in biyu za su bayyana ku a wani ɓangare.

Me ya sa nake samun INTP a wani gwaji da ISTP a wani?

Sifofin hali suna ci gaba kuma yawancin mutane suna samun maki kusa da tsakiya, don haka ƙananan bambance-bambance a yadda kuke amsawa za su iya juya harafi. Sauyin nau’i idan aka sake gwaji yana daga cikin matsalolin gwaje-gwajen haruffa huɗu da aka fi rubutawa. Tun da INTP da ISTP sun bambanta da harafi ɗaya, wataƙila kuna kusa da tsakiyar Buɗaɗɗen tunani.

Shin INTP da ISTP sun dace da juna?

Wannan tambaya ce dabam da wanda kuke. A manyan bincike, kamanceceniyar halin masoya biyu ba ta bayyana kusan komai ba bayan sifofin kowannensu; natsuwar zuciya, sauƙin kai da ƙwazo na kowane masoyi sun fi muhimmanci. Shafin dacewar INTP da ISTP yana bayani kan soyayya, abota da aiki ga wannan haɗi.

Shin mutum zai iya zama INTP da ISTP duka?

Ta wata fuska, ee. Idan makinku na Buɗaɗɗen tunani yana kusa da matsakaici, kuna tsakanin nau’o’in biyu, kuma duka bayanan za su dace da ku a wani ɓangare. Kusan mutum ɗaya cikin biyar yana samun maki tsakanin percentile na 40 da na 60 a kowace sifa, shi ya sa gwajin 64 Types yake yi wa waɗannan haruffa alamar kan iyaka.

Binciken dacewa da aka ambata a sama: kamanceceniya ta bayyana kaɗan ne bayan sifofin kowane masoyi[6]; sifofin kowane masoyi sun fi muhimmanci.[5]

Ku zurfafa

Bayanin INTP · Bayanin ISTP · Dacewar INTP da ISTP

Kwatance makamantan wannan

ENTP vs INTP · bambanci a son jama’aINFP vs INTP · bambanci a sauƙin kaiINTJ vs INTP · bambanci a ƙwazoESTP vs ISTP · bambanci a son jama’aISFP vs ISTP · bambanci a sauƙin kaiISTJ vs ISTP · bambanci a ƙwazo

Dukkan kwatancen nau’o’i

Majiyoyi

  1. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1989). Reinterpreting the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator from the perspective of the five-factor model of personality. Journal of Personality, 57(1), 17–40.
  2. Feist, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(4), 290–309.
  3. Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44(1), 1–26.
  4. Larson, L. M., Rottinghaus, P. J., & Borgen, F. H. (2002). Meta-analyses of Big Six interests and Big Five personality factors. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61(2), 217–239.
  5. Malouff, J. M., Thorsteinsson, E. B., Schutte, N. S., Bhullar, N., & Rooke, S. E. (2010). The five-factor model of personality and relationship satisfaction of intimate partners: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 44(1), 124–127.
  6. Dyrenforth, P. S., Kashy, D. A., Donnellan, M. B., & Lucas, R. E. (2010). Predicting relationship and life satisfaction from personality in nationally representative samples from three countries: The relative importance of actor, partner, and similarity effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(4), 690–702.
  7. Steel, P., Schmidt, J., & Shultz, J. (2008). Refining the relationship between personality and subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 134(1), 138–161.
  8. Bess, T. L., & Harvey, R. J. (2002). Bimodal score distributions and the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator: Fact or artifact? Journal of Personality Assessment, 78(1), 176–186.
  9. Pittenger, D. J. (2005). Cautionary comments regarding the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 57(3), 210–221.
  10. Capraro, R. M., & Capraro, M. M. (2002). Myers-Briggs Type Indicator score reliability across studies: A meta-analytic reliability generalization study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 62(4), 590–602.