INFJ + INTJ
INFJ da INTJ: dacewa a soyayya, abota da aiki
INFJ da INTJ suna tarayya a haruffa 3 cikin 4, I (mai son kaɗaici), N (mai hasashe) da J (mai tsari), kuma sun bambanta a sauƙin kai. Kamanceceniya ita kaɗai tana hasashen kaɗan ne; matakan kowane mutum a wasu ’yan muhimman sifofi sun fi muhimmanci.
Abin da suke tarayya a kai da inda suka bambanta
Ku duka biyu kuna dawo da kuzari cikin natsuwa da ƙananan taruka. Ku yi tsammanin gida mai natsuwa, kuma ku lura kada ya zama kullum mutum ɗaya ne yake fara tuntuɓa.
Yana daidai da harafin gargajiya na E/I, wanda yake da alaƙa mai ƙarfi da son jama’a na Big Five.
Ku duka biyu ra’ayoyi, sababbin abubuwa da tattaunawar “in da a ce” suna jan hankalinku. Ku yi tsammanin dogayen hirarraki da sha’awar tare ta gwada sababbin abubuwa.
Yana daidai da harafin N/S, wanda yake da alaƙa mai ƙarfi da buɗaɗɗen tunani na Big Five.
Ɗaya yana gabatar da jituwa, ɗayan kuma gaskiya. Yawancin saɓani a nan game da salon magana ne, ba abin da ake faɗa ba.
Yana daidai da harafin F/T (F = sauƙin kai mafi yawa). Alaƙarsa da MBTI matsakaiciya ce.
Ku duka biyu kuna son tsare-tsare, tsari da cika alkawari. Ku yi tsammanin rayuwar tare mai kyakkyawan tsari, kuma ku yi hattara da taurin kai idan shiri ya lalace.
Yana daidai da harafin J/P (J = ƙwazo mafi yawa). Alaƙarsa da MBTI matsakaiciya ce.
Abin da bayanai suka nuna: INFJ da INTJ
Daga namu nazarin mutane 19,718 da suka amsa kalaman IPIP na Big Five na jama’a (Open Psychometrics), aka ba su maki daidai da wannan gwaji.
| Sifa | INFJ | INTJ |
|---|---|---|
| Son jama’a | 29 | 24 |
| Buɗaɗɗen tunani | 75 | 75 |
| Sauƙin kai | 76 | 23 |
| Ƙwazo | 76 | 75 |
| Natsuwar zuciya | 51 | 48 |
| Kaso a samfurin | 4.9% | 6.3% |
Lambobin matsakaicin percentile ne (50 = tsakiyar samfurin). Haruffa huɗu suna raba kowace sifa a tsakiya, don haka bisa tsarinsu waɗannan matsakaita suna kusa da 75 ko 25. Natsuwar zuciya ba ta cikin haruffa huɗu, don haka tana nuna bambance-bambance na gaske tsakanin nau’o’i.
Natsuwar zuciya ita ce sifar da haruffa huɗu suke barinta a waje. Mutanen INFJ suna da matsakaicin percentile 51 a cikinta (54% suna da harafin C, mai natsuwa); mutanen INTJ suna da matsakaicin 48 (48%).
Idan aka haɗa mutumin INFJ da mutumin INTJ da aka zaɓa ba da tsari ba, a kashi 26% na lokuta duka biyu za su sami harafin C (mai natsuwa), a kashi 24% kuma duka biyu harafin R (mai saurin ji). Natsuwar zuciyar kowane masoyi tana daga cikin abubuwan da suka fi bayyana wajen hasashen gamsuwa a dangantaka.[2]
Matsakaita suna bayyana rukunoni ne, ba ku ba. Mutane da yawa na kowane nau’i suna samun maki mai nisa da su, shi ya sa gwajin yake nuna percentile ɗinku na kanku.
INFJ da INTJ a soyayya
Ƙarfi
- Masoyi INFJ yawanci ya fi yawa a Sauƙin kai (F), kuma hakan yana amfanar ku duka biyu. Yawan sauƙin kai yana hasashen saɓani mai gina jiki da masoya masu ƙarin gamsuwa.[2][3]
- Nau’o’in biyu yawanci suna sama da matsakaici a Ƙwazo (harafin J). Ƙwazo yana hasashen gamsuwar masoyi. Ƙarancin ƙwazo yana da alaƙa da rashin aminci a yankuna dabam-dabam na duniya.[2][4]
Abubuwan da za su iya kawo saɓani
- Yawanci babu ɗayan nau’o’in biyu da yake sama a Son jama’a. Son jama’a na masoyi yana da raunanniyar alaƙa da gamsuwa. A wannan haɗin, ƙoƙari na da gangan yana da riba.[2]
- Sauƙin kai (INFJ ya fi zama mai tausayi, INTJ ya fi zama mai tsauri): ku yi tsammanin saɓani game da yadda ake tafiyar da rashin jituwa: a faɗe shi kai tsaye ko a ƙyale shi.
Shawarwarin aiki (shawara, ba sakamakon bincike ba)
- Masoya biyu masu shiru za su iya barin dangantakar ta ƙanƙance har ta zama ku biyu kawai. Ku riƙe aƙalla wani aiki ɗaya da kuke yi tare wanda ya ƙunshi wasu mutane.
- Salon saɓani dabam-dabam: ɗaya yana faɗa, ɗayan kuma yana ƙyale abu. Ku yarda cewa faɗin matsala da wuri kulawa ne, ba hari ba.
INFJ da INTJ a matsayin abokai
Ƙarfi
- Aboki INFJ yawanci ya fi yawa a Sauƙin kai (F), kuma hakan yana amfanar ku duka biyu. Ana yawan zaɓar mutane masu yawan sauƙin kai a matsayin abokai, kuma abotarsu tana ƙara ɗorewa.[5][6]
Abubuwan da za su iya kawo saɓani
- Yawanci babu ɗayan nau’o’in biyu da yake sama a Son jama’a. Son jama’a yana hasashen samun abokai da sauri da kuma da yawa. A wannan haɗin, ƙoƙari na da gangan yana da riba.[5][6]
- Sauƙin kai (INFJ ya fi zama mai tausayi, INTJ ya fi zama mai tsauri): ku yi tsammanin saɓani game da salon magana, domin gaskiya za ta iya ɓata wa mai taushin rai rai.
Shawarwarin aiki (shawara, ba sakamakon bincike ba)
- Masu son kaɗaici biyu za su iya yin watanni ba tare da wani ya fara tuntuɓa ba. Wata ƙayyadaddiyar al’ada (cin abincin dare sau ɗaya a wata, kira sau ɗaya a mako) tana kawar da buƙatar wani ya fara.
- Ɗaya yana magana kai tsaye, ɗayan kuma yana da hankali. Zai taimaka idan wanda ya fi magana kai tsaye ya fara da abin da yake daraja.
INFJ da INTJ a wurin aiki
Ƙarfi
- Nau’o’in biyu yawanci suna sama da matsakaici a Ƙwazo (harafin J). Ƙwazo shi ne mai hasashe na hali mafi daidaito ga ƙwazon aiki.[7]
Abubuwan da za su iya kawo saɓani
- Sauƙin kai (INFJ ya fi zama mai tausayi, INTJ ya fi zama mai tsauri): ku yi tsammanin saɓani game da yadda ake ba da kuma karɓar ra’ayi kan aiki.
Shawarwarin aiki (shawara, ba sakamakon bincike ba)
- Ku raba a fili tsakanin ra’ayi game da aiki da girmama mutum.
Yadda harafi na biyar da na shida suke sauya hoton
Kowane nau’i yana da rassa huɗu. Ƙarin haruffa biyu su ne ainihin waɗanda gwajin haruffa huɗu yake barinsu, kuma ga dangantaka sun fi yawancin haruffa huɗu na asali muhimmanci.
Natsuwar zuciya: C (Mai natsuwa) ko R (Mai saurin ji)
- Natsuwar zuciya (harafi na biyar, C ko R) ba a auna ta a nau’o’in haruffa huɗu, duk da haka tana daga cikin sifofin hali mafi dogaro wajen hasashen gamsuwa da ɗorewar dangantaka. Tana da muhimmanci a kowane mutum: masoyi mai ƙarin natsuwa yana taimakawa, ko da wane nau’i ne ɗayan.[2][8]
- Idan ku duka biyu C ne (masu natsuwa), kuna farawa daga matsayin da shaida ta fi goyon baya. Idan ɗayanku R ne (mai saurin ji), babban haɗarin shi ne damuwa ta koma rikici. Faɗin “ina cikin damuwa ne, ban yi fushi da kai ba” yana taimaka wa ɗayan ya mayar da martani yadda ya dace.
- Idan ku duka biyu R ne, ku yi tsammanin damuwa za ta yaɗu daga ɗayanku zuwa ɗayan. Duk da haka, wannan ita ce sifar da ta fi sauyawa: yawanci mutane suna ƙara natsuwa da shekaru, kuma tana sauyawa ta hanyar da ake iya aunawa da jinya da ƙoƙari na da gangan.[9][10][11]
- A wurin aiki, natsuwar zuciya ita ce alaƙa mafi ƙarfi tsakanin hali da gamsuwa da aiki. Idan ɗayanku R ne, sanar da shi sauye-sauye tun da wuri ba ya da tsada kuma yana taimakawa sosai (shawara ce, ba sakamakon bincike ba).[12]
Gaskiya da tawali’u: M (Mai tawali’u) ko A (Mai buri)
- Gaskiya da tawali’u (harafi na shida, M ko A) suna hasashen halin adalci da haɗin kai inda ake buƙatar aminci, kuma a kan haka ne abota da dangantaka suke tafiya.[13]
- Ƙarancin gaskiya da tawali’u (A) yana kama da sifofin yaudara na “dark triad”, kuma ita ce sifa a tsarin HEXACO da ta fi alaƙa da halaye masu cutarwa a wurin aiki. Idan ku duka biyu M ne, ku duka kuna da sifar da take da alaƙa da adalci; idan ɗayanku A ne, bayyana gaskiya game da kuɗi, yabo da matsayi ya fi muhimmanci.[14][15]
- Ku sani cewa manyan nazarce-nazarce kan gamsuwar masoya sun yi amfani da Big Five, wanda ba shi da wani ɓangare dabam na gaskiya da tawali’u, don haka shaidar wannan harafi a soyayya ba ta kai shaidarsa a kan aminci da haɗin kai ba.[2][16]
Dalilin da ya sa kamanceceniya ba ta da muhimmanci kamar yadda ake zato
- A samfurori na ƙasa daga ƙasashe uku, kamanceceniyar halin masoya biyu ba ta bayyana kusan komai ba bayan sifofin kowannensu.[1]
- Sifofin da suke hasashen ingancin dangantaka da gaske su ne natsuwar zuciya, sauƙin kai da ƙwazo na kowane mutum, kuma waɗannan sifofi suna sauyawa da shekaru da ƙoƙari.[2][9][11]
- Haruffa huɗu suna daidai da sifofin Big Five na gaske, amma T/F da J/P a matsakaici ne kawai, don haka kowane mutum zai iya bambanta da matakan da aka saba gani a nau’insa.[17]
- Alaƙoƙi kamar waɗannan tsakanin sifofi da sakamako ana maimaita su da kyau a bincike, amma kowacce ƙarama ce, kuma yawanci ɗan ƙasa da yadda aka ruwaito tun farko. Suna sauya yiwuwa; ba sa yanke sakamako.[18]
Nau’i matsakaici ne. Ku yi gwajin kyauta, sannan ku gayyaci masoyinku, abokinku ko abokin aikinku don ku ga inda ku duka biyu kuke da gaske a dukkan sifofi shida.
Tambayoyin da ake yawan yi
Shin INFJ da INTJ sun dace da juna?
Babu wani bincike da ya nuna cewa wani haɗin nau’o’i ya fi wani dacewa da tabbas, kuma kamanceceniyar hali tana bayyana ƙalilan ne kawai na gamsuwa a dangantaka. INFJ da INTJ suna tarayya a haruffa 3 cikin 4. Abubuwan da suka fi hasashe su ne natsuwar zuciya, sauƙin kai da ƙwazo na kowannensu, waɗanda nau’i mai haruffa huɗu yake kama wani ɓangare nasu kawai.
Shin INFJ da INTJ masoya ne masu kyau?
Masoyi INFJ yawanci ya fi yawa a Sauƙin kai (F), kuma hakan yana amfanar ku duka biyu. Yawan sauƙin kai yana hasashen saɓani mai gina jiki da masoya masu ƙarin gamsuwa. Shawarar aiki: Masoya biyu masu shiru za su iya barin dangantakar ta ƙanƙance har ta zama ku biyu kawai. Ku riƙe aƙalla wani aiki ɗaya da kuke yi tare wanda ya ƙunshi wasu mutane. Ko kowannenku yana da natsuwar zuciya (harafin C/R) yana daga cikin abubuwan hasashe mafi ƙarfi da aka sani, kuma haruffa huɗu ba za su iya nuna shi ba.
Shin INFJ da INTJ za su iya zama abokai na kurkusa?
Aboki INFJ yawanci ya fi yawa a Sauƙin kai (F), kuma hakan yana amfanar ku duka biyu. Ana yawan zaɓar mutane masu yawan sauƙin kai a matsayin abokai, kuma abotarsu tana ƙara ɗorewa. Shawarar aiki: Masu son kaɗaici biyu za su iya yin watanni ba tare da wani ya fara tuntuɓa ba. Wata ƙayyadaddiyar al’ada (cin abincin dare sau ɗaya a wata, kira sau ɗaya a mako) tana kawar da buƙatar wani ya fara.
Shin INFJ da INTJ suna aiki tare da kyau?
Nau’o’in biyu yawanci suna sama da matsakaici a Ƙwazo (harafin J). Ƙwazo shi ne mai hasashe na hali mafi daidaito ga ƙwazon aiki. Gaskiya da tawali’u (harafin M/A) su ne masu hasashe mafi ƙarfi a tsarin HEXACO na ƙarancin halaye masu cutarwa a wurin aiki, don haka yana da kyau a san su ma.
Game da waɗannan nau’o’i
Kuna haɗa hasashe da tausayi tare da ƙarfin son tsari. Kuna yin shiru a manyan taruka amma kuna shiga sosai idan ku biyu ne kawai, kuma sau da yawa manufofi na dogon lokaci da suka samo asali daga ƙa’idodinku ne suke motsa ku.
Kuna haɗa son ra’ayoyi da ladabin aiki tare da salo kai tsaye mai cin gashin kai. Kun fi son warware matsaloli ku kaɗai ko tare da ’yan mutanen da kuka amince da su, kuma kuna ɗora wa kanku da wasu manyan ma’auni.
Sauran haɗe-haɗe
INFJ tare da: INTPENTJENTPINFJINFPENFJENFPISTJISFJESTJESFJISTPISFPESTPESFP
INTJ tare da: INTJINTPENTJENTPINFPENFJENFPISTJISFJESTJESFJISTPISFPESTPESFP
Majiyoyi
- Dyrenforth, P. S., Kashy, D. A., Donnellan, M. B., & Lucas, R. E. (2010). Predicting relationship and life satisfaction from personality in nationally representative samples from three countries: The relative importance of actor, partner, and similarity effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(4), 690–702.
- Malouff, J. M., Thorsteinsson, E. B., Schutte, N. S., Bhullar, N., & Rooke, S. E. (2010). The five-factor model of personality and relationship satisfaction of intimate partners: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 44(1), 124–127.
- Jensen-Campbell, L. A., & Graziano, W. G. (2001). Agreeableness as a moderator of interpersonal conflict. Journal of Personality, 69(2), 323–362.
- Schmitt, D. P. (2004). The Big Five related to risky sexual behaviour across 10 world regions: Differential personality associations of sexual promiscuity and relationship infidelity. European Journal of Personality, 18(4), 301–319.
- Selfhout, M., Burk, W., Branje, S., Denissen, J., van Aken, M., & Meeus, W. (2010). Emerging late adolescent friendship networks and Big Five personality traits: A social network approach. Journal of Personality, 78(2), 509–538.
- Harris, K., & Vazire, S. (2016). On friendship development and the Big Five personality traits. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 10(11), 647–667.
- Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44(1), 1–26.
- Karney, B. R., & Bradbury, T. N. (1995). The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: A review of theory, method, and research. Psychological Bulletin, 118(1), 3–34.
- Roberts, B. W., Walton, K. E., & Viechtbauer, W. (2006). Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 132(1), 1–25.
- Roberts, B. W., Luo, J., Briley, D. A., Chow, P. I., Su, R., & Hill, P. L. (2017). A systematic review of personality trait change through intervention. Psychological Bulletin, 143(2), 117–141.
- Hudson, N. W., & Fraley, R. C. (2015). Volitional personality trait change: Can people choose to change their personality traits? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(3), 490–507.
- Judge, T. A., Heller, D., & Mount, M. K. (2002). Five-factor model of personality and job satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 530–541.
- Thielmann, I., Spadaro, G., & Balliet, D. (2020). Personality and prosocial behavior: A theoretical framework and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 146(1), 30–90.
- Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2005). Psychopathy, Machiavellianism, and narcissism in the Five-Factor Model and the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Individual Differences, 38(7), 1571–1582.
- Pletzer, J. L., Bentvelzen, M., Oostrom, J. K., & de Vries, R. E. (2019). A meta-analysis of the relations between personality and workplace deviance: Big Five versus HEXACO. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 112, 369–383.
- Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2007). Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11(2), 150–166.
- McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1989). Reinterpreting the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator from the perspective of the five-factor model of personality. Journal of Personality, 57(1), 17–40.
- Soto, C. J. (2019). How replicable are links between personality traits and consequential life outcomes? The Life Outcomes of Personality Replication Project. Psychological Science, 30(5), 711–727.