INFJ-CM · Mai Hangen Nesa · Natsattse kuma Mai Gaskiya
INFJ-CM a abota: yadda INFJ-CM yake samun abokai da riƙe su
INFJ-CM yana gina abota da riƙe ta a matsayin mai son kaɗaici, mai hasashe, mai tausayi, mai tsari, mai natsuwa da mai tawali’u. A ƙasa: yadda hakan yake a zahiri, abin da bincike ya ce game da hali da abota, da inda saɓani zai iya tasowa da abokan da suka bambanta da ku.
Kuna haɗa hasashe da tausayi tare da ƙarfin son tsari. Kuna yin shiru a manyan taruka amma kuna shiga sosai idan ku biyu ne kawai, kuma sau da yawa manufofi na dogon lokaci da suka samo asali daga ƙa’idodinku ne suke motsa ku. Kuna kasancewa cikin natsuwa a ƙarƙashin matsi (natsuwar zuciya mai yawa) kuma kuna da tawali’u da adalci (gaskiya da tawali’u masu yawa). Sau da yawa wasu suna ganin ku a matsayin abin dogaro a lokacin wahala da kuma amintattu da nauyi.
Yadda INFJ-CM yake a matsayin aboki
Yadda kowane harafi yakan bayyana. Waɗannan bayanin sifofin ne, ba sakamakon bincike ba.
Wataƙila kun fi son ’yan abokai na kurkusa fiye da babbar da’ira, da zurfin hira fiye da yawan haɗuwa.
Hirarrakin da suke shiga cikin ra’ayoyi, littattafai, ka’idoji ko tsare-tsare wataƙila su ne abin da kuka fi daraja a wajen abokai.
Wataƙila abokai suna zuwa wajenku don neman goyon baya da kunne mai tausayi.
Wataƙila ku ne kuke tunawa da ranakun haihuwa, kuke sa ranar haɗuwa kuma kuke zuwa a kan lokaci.
Wataƙila ku ne masu kwantar da hankali idan abokai suna cikin wani rikici.
Wataƙila kuna ɗaukar abokai a matsayin daidai da ku, kuma ku ne mutumin da ake amincewa da sirri a wajensa.
Sifofin INFJ a abota: bincike da shawarwarin aiki
- Wataƙila kuna samun abokai a hankali. Son jama’a ya fi hasashen yawan abokan da za ku samu fiye da yadda abotar take kurkusa.[1][2]
- Haɗuwa masu natsuwa akai-akai (yawo na kowane mako, kira a wata rana ta musamman) suna gina kusanci ba tare da gajiyar da ku ba.
- A wani bincike da ya bibiyi ɗaliban jami’a na watanni 18, son jama’a ya yi hasashen gina babbar hanyar sadarwa da sauran ɗalibai. Girman da’ira ba ɗaya yake da kusanci ba, don haka ƙaramar da’ira ba nakasu ba ce.[3][2]
- Sauƙin kai yana taimakawa wajen ginawa da riƙe abota, saboda mutane suna jin aminci idan suna tare da ku.[2]
- Idan aka sami rashin jituwa, mutane masu yawan sauƙin kai suna amfani da hanyoyi masu gina jiki kuma ba kasafai suke ƙara rura saɓani ba, wanda yake kare abota a lokuta masu wahala.[4]
- Ku ne abokin da yake tunawa kuma yake zuwa. Kasancewa abin dogaro shi ne tushen aminci mai natsuwa.
- Kuna samun kuzari daga abokan da za ku iya musayar ra’ayoyi, littattafai da sababbin abubuwa da su.
INFJ-CM tare da abokai masu bambanci: abubuwan da suke kawo saɓani da mafita
Inda ku da ɗayan mutumin kuke a gefe dabam-dabam na harafi ɗaya. Shawarwarin aiki, ba sakamakon bincike ba.
Ɗaya yana son manyan taruka, ɗayan kuma haɗuwa ku biyu kawai. Ku riƙa musanya tsakanin hanyoyin biyu.
Ku riƙa musanya tsakanin tattauna ra’ayoyi da yin ayyuka na zahiri tare.
Ɗaya yana magana kai tsaye, ɗayan kuma yana da hankali. Zai taimaka idan wanda ya fi magana kai tsaye ya fara da abin da yake daraja.
Ɗaya yana tsarawa, ɗayan kuma yana yin abu nan take. Ku bar mai tsarawa ya sa lokaci, ɗayan kuma ya zaɓi abin da za a yi.
Abokin da ya fi natsuwa yakan zama ginshiƙin dogaro. Ku tabbatar cewa taimako yana tafiya ta ɓangarorin biyu.
Ɗaya yana neman matsayi, ɗayan kuma mai tawali’u ne. Kada ku bar abota ta koma kan kwatanta kai.
Abin da haruffan -CM suke ƙara wa INFJ a abota
C = Mai natsuwa (natsuwar zuciya), M = Mai tawali’u (gaskiya da tawali’u). Gwajin gargajiya na haruffa huɗu ba ya auna ko ɗaya daga cikinsu, amma duka biyu suna da muhimmanci a abota:
- Sau da yawa abokai suna dogara da ku a lokacin wahala. Ku tabbatar cewa taimako yana tafiya ta ɓangarorin biyu.
- Mutane suna amincewa da ku da sirrinsu kuma suna dogara da adalcinku, mabuɗin abota ta kurkusa.
- Gaskiya da tawali’u suna hasashen halin adalci da haɗin kai inda ake buƙatar aminci, wato irin dogaron da abota take tafiya a kai.[5]
Yaya ƙarfin waɗannan sakamako yake?
- Haruffa huɗu na gargajiya suna daidai da huɗu daga cikin sifofin Big Five (son jama’a, buɗaɗɗen tunani, sauƙin kai, ƙwazo), shi ya sa binciken Big Five ya shafe su.[6]
- Alaƙoƙin da ke tsakanin sifofi da sakamako gaskiya ne amma kowanne ƙarami ne: alaƙar da aka saba gani tana kusan 0.10 zuwa 0.30, don haka sifofi suna sauya yiwuwa ne maimakon su yanke sakamako. Wani babban aikin maimaita bincike ya tabbatar da yawancin alaƙoƙin da aka gwada, yawanci da tasiri ɗan ƙasa.[7][8]
Layukan da ba su da majiya shawarwarin aiki ne ko bayanin sifofi, ba sakamakon bincike ba.
Gwajin kyauta yana auna dukkan sifofi shida a matsayin percentile. Tambayoyi 62, kusan minti 8, ba rajista.
Ku yi gwajin kyautaKuna da sakamako tuni? Ku kwatanta da aboki.
Shafukan da suka shafi wannan
Majiyoyi
- Selfhout, M., Burk, W., Branje, S., Denissen, J., van Aken, M., & Meeus, W. (2010). Emerging late adolescent friendship networks and Big Five personality traits: A social network approach. Journal of Personality, 78(2), 509–538.
- Harris, K., & Vazire, S. (2016). On friendship development and the Big Five personality traits. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 10(11), 647–667.
- Asendorpf, J. B., & Wilpers, S. (1998). Personality effects on social relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1531–1544.
- Jensen-Campbell, L. A., & Graziano, W. G. (2001). Agreeableness as a moderator of interpersonal conflict. Journal of Personality, 69(2), 323–362.
- Thielmann, I., Spadaro, G., & Balliet, D. (2020). Personality and prosocial behavior: A theoretical framework and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 146(1), 30–90.
- McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1989). Reinterpreting the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator from the perspective of the five-factor model of personality. Journal of Personality, 57(1), 17–40.
- Soto, C. J. (2019). How replicable are links between personality traits and consequential life outcomes? The Life Outcomes of Personality Replication Project. Psychological Science, 30(5), 711–727.
- Ozer, D. J., & Benet-Martínez, V. (2006). Personality and the prediction of consequential outcomes. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 401–421.