INFP vs ISTJ

INFP ko ISTJ: yadda za a bambanta su

INFP da ISTJ suna tarayya ne kawai a harafin I (mai son kaɗaici) kuma sun bambanta a sauran uku. Idan gwaje-gwaje sun ba ku duka biyu, bayanin da ya fi yiwuwa shi ne kuna kusa da tsakiya a sifofi da dama, ko kun amsa kuna tunanin yanayi dabam-dabam.

INFP · Mai Mafarki

Mai taushi, mai hasashe, mai jin abin da wasu suke ji, mara takura.

Kuna da hasashe, kirki kuma kuna karkata ga cikin kanku, tare da wadataccen tunani na ciki. Kun fi son sassauci fiye da tsauraran tsare-tsare, kuma kuna yin aiki mafi kyau idan ya shafi wani abu da kuke kula da shi.

ISTJ · Mai Gudanarwa

Mai shiru, mai aiki da zahiri, mai magana kai tsaye, abin dogaro.

Kuna da shiru, ƙafafunku suna ƙasa, kuna da gaskiya kuma kuna da tsari sosai. Kuna amincewa da hanyoyin da aka tabbatar, kuna cika abin da kuka yi alkawari, kuma kun fi son dokoki da nauye-nauye bayyanannu.

Yadda za a zaɓa tsakanin INFP da ISTJ

Ku warware harafi ɗaya a lokaci ɗaya. INFP da ISTJ sun bambanta a N/S, F/T da J/P, kuma kowanne tambaya ce dabam.
Ku fara da harafin da kuka fi rashin tabbaci a kansa kuma ku yi amfani da tambayoyin tunaninsa da ke ƙasa.
Idan kuna gefe ɗaya a fili a wasu haruffa kuma a tsakiya a wasu, wataƙila wani nau’i na uku ya fi dacewa da ku fiye da waɗannan biyu. Ku gwada kwatancen da aka haɗa a ƙasan shafin.
Gwajin da yake ba da percentile yana nuna waɗanne haruffanku ne bayyanannu da waɗanda suke kan iyaka. Bayyanannu ne suka fi bayyana ku.

Bambanci: N ko S (Buɗaɗɗen tunani)

Buɗaɗɗen tunani ga sabon abu (Openness to Experience) na Big Five (wanda aka auna a nan a matsayin hikima da hasashe): son bincike, ƙirƙira, sha’awar ra’ayoyi da tunani marar zahiri. Yana daidai da harafin N/S, wanda yake da alaƙa mai ƙarfi da buɗaɗɗen tunani na Big Five.

INFP

N · Mai hasashe

Kuna son bincike kuma kuna da hasashe, kuma kuna jin daɗin ra’ayoyi marasa zahiri, ka’idoji da sababbin abubuwa.

ISTJ

S · Mai aiki da zahiri

Kun fi son abubuwa na zahiri, waɗanda aka tabbatar kuma masu amfani, kuma kuna amincewa da gogewa fiye da ka’ida.

Yadda yake bayyana a yau da kullum

Bayanin abin da sifar take, ba sakamakon bincike ba.

Aiki da sana’a

INFP (N): Wataƙila ra’ayoyi, tsare-tsare da damammaki suna jan hankalinku, kuma kuna gajiya idan aiki ya zama maimaitawa kawai.
ISTJ (S): Wataƙila kun fi son ayyuka na zahiri masu sakamakon da ake gani, kuma kuna amincewa da hanyoyin da aka riga aka tabbatar suna aiki.

Soyayya da dangantaka

INFP (N): Wataƙila kuna jin daɗin tattauna ra’ayoyi, tsare-tsare da ma’anar rayuwa da masoyi, kuma kuna daraja sababbin abubuwa a abubuwan da kuke yi tare.
ISTJ (S): Wataƙila kuna nuna soyayya ta hanyar taimako na zahiri da al’adun yau da kullum masu dogaro fiye da manyan nune-nune ko dogayen hirarraki marasa zahiri.

Abin da bincike ya danganta da kowane gefe

N · Mai hasashe (INFP)

Buɗaɗɗen tunani yana da alaƙa mai daidaito da nasarar ƙirƙira, a fasaha da kuma a kimiyya.^[1]
Buɗaɗɗen tunani yana hasashen nasara a horo, wato koyo yayin aiki.^[2]

S · Mai aiki da zahiri (ISTJ)

Buɗaɗɗen tunani yana hasashen nasara a horo. A fannonin da suke sauyawa da sauri, ku yi tsammanin ƙarin ƙoƙarin koyo.^[2]
Ƙarancin buɗaɗɗen tunani yana da alaƙa da ƙarancin sha’awar ayyukan fasaha da na bincike. Sau da yawa matsayi na zahiri, na aikin hannu da masu bin ƙa’idoji sun fi dacewa.^[3]

Matsakaita ne a cikin mutane da yawa. Tasiri irin wannan gaskiya ne amma yawanci ƙarami ne, don haka yana sauya yiwuwa ga rukuni kuma yana faɗin kaɗan game da kowane mutum guda.

Dalilin da ya sa mutane suke rikita N da S

N ba game da yawan basirarku ba ne. Yana bayyana yadda ra’ayoyi, hasashe da sababbin abubuwa suke jan hankalinku. Mutane masu ƙwarewa sosai da yawa sun fi son abubuwa na zahiri da aka tabbatar.

Tambayoyin tunani don N ko S (tambayoyin da za a yi tunani a kai, ba gwaji ko maki ba)

Idan kuka ji sabon ra’ayi, kuna jin daɗin bin abubuwan da zai haifar da “in da a ce” (N), ko kuna fara son sanin ko yana aiki a zahiri (S)?
Shin tattaunawa marasa zahiri game da ka’idoji, falsafa ko hasashe tana burge ku saboda kanta (N), ko tana kama da ɓata lokaci daga matsaloli na gaske (S)?
Wajen koyon sabon abu, kuna son ƙa’idar da ke ƙasa da farko (N), ko misali na zahiri da za ku iya yin atisaye a kai (S)?

Ku amsa bisa abin da kuke yawan yi, ba abin da kuke son yi ba. Idan amsoshinku sun rabu daidai, wataƙila kuna kusa da tsakiya a wannan sifa.

Bambanci: F ko T (Sauƙin kai)

Sauƙin kai (Agreeableness) na Big Five: tausayi, karimci, amincewa da wasu da shirin haɗa kai. Yana daidai da harafin F/T (F = sauƙin kai mafi yawa). Alaƙarsa da MBTI matsakaiciya ce.

INFP

F · Mai tausayi

Kuna da karimci, kulawa da taimako, kuma kuna la’akari da yadda wasu suke ji.

ISTJ

T · Mai tsauri

Kuna magana kai tsaye, kuna da shakka kuma kuna son gasa, kuma kuna sa gaskiya da sakamako a gaban jituwa.

Yadda yake bayyana a yau da kullum

Bayanin abin da sifar take, ba sakamakon bincike ba.

Aiki da sana’a

INFP (F): Wataƙila kuna lura da yadda shawarwari suke shafar mutane kuma kuna daraja yanayin haɗin kai a ƙungiya.
ISTJ (T): Wataƙila kuna gabatar da hankali, ma’auni da sakamako, kuma ba ku jin nauyin faɗin gaskiya mai ɗaci.

Soyayya da dangantaka

INFP (F): Wataƙila kuna lura da yadda masoyinku yake ji kuma kuna karkata ga sassautawa don kiyaye zaman lafiya.
ISTJ (T): Wataƙila kun fi daraja gaskiya fiye da kwantar da hankali, kuma kuna iya nuna kulawa ta hanyar warware matsaloli maimakon nuna tausayi.

Abin da bincike ya danganta da kowane gefe

F · Mai tausayi (INFP)

Mutane masu yawan sauƙin kai suna amfani da hanyoyi masu gina jiki a rikici, kuma ba kasafai suke ƙara rura shi ba.^[5]
Ana yawan zaɓar mutane masu yawan sauƙin kai a matsayin abokai.^[6]

T · Mai tsauri (ISTJ)

Ƙarancin sauƙin kai yana da alaƙa da samun kuɗi mafi yawa, musamman a wajen maza.^[7]
Ƙarancin sauƙin kai yana hasashen hanyoyi masu ɓarna a rashin jituwa.^[5]

Matsakaita ne a cikin mutane da yawa. Tasiri irin wannan gaskiya ne amma yawanci ƙarami ne, don haka yana sauya yiwuwa ga rukuni kuma yana faɗin kaɗan game da kowane mutum guda.

Dalilin da ya sa mutane suke rikita F da T

Ladabi ko gaskiya ba ɗaya suke da F ba. Tsarin HEXACO yana bambanta sauƙin kai (kirki, haƙuri, yafiya) da gaskiya da tawali’u (gaskiya da adalci), don haka mai magana kai tsaye zai iya zama mai cikakken adalci, kuma mai iya ɗaukar hankali zai iya zama mai dabara.^[4]

Tambayoyin tunani don F ko T (tambayoyin da za a yi tunani a kai, ba gwaji ko maki ba)

Idan aboki ya nuna muku aikin da yake da matsaloli a fili, tunaninku na farko shi ne ku kare yadda yake ji (F) ko ku faɗi matsalolin a fili (T)?
A saɓani, kuna neman abin da kuka yarda a kai (F), ko kuna ci gaba da matsawa har sai hujja mafi ƙarfi ta yi nasara (T)?
Kuna yawan ɗauka cewa mutane suna da kyakkyawar niyya har sai an nuna akasin haka (F), ko kuna jira sai sun cancanci amincewarku (T)?

Ku amsa bisa abin da kuke yawan yi, ba abin da kuke son yi ba. Idan amsoshinku sun rabu daidai, wataƙila kuna kusa da tsakiya a wannan sifa.

Bambanci: P ko J (Ƙwazo)

Ƙwazo (Conscientiousness) na Big Five: tsari, jajircewa, horon kai da kasancewa abin dogaro. Yana daidai da harafin J/P (J = ƙwazo mafi yawa). Alaƙarsa da MBTI matsakaiciya ce.

INFP

P · Mai sassauci

Kuna yin abu nan take kuma kuna saurin sabawa da yanayi. Kuna son barin hanyoyi a buɗe kuma kuna aiki ta hanyar fashewar kuzari.

ISTJ

J · Mai tsari

Kuna tsarawa, ana iya dogara da ku kuma kuna lura da ƙananan bayanai, kuma kuna son kammala abin da kuka fara.

Yadda yake bayyana a yau da kullum

Bayanin abin da sifar take, ba sakamakon bincike ba.

Aiki da sana’a

INFP (P): Wataƙila kuna aiki ta hanyar fashewar kuzari, kuna saurin sabawa da sauyi kuma kun fi son abubuwa dabam-dabam fiye da tsayayyun al’adu.
ISTJ (J): Wataƙila kuna tsarawa tun da wuri, kuna cika alkawari kuma kun fi son bayyanannun ranakun ƙarshe da nauye-nauye.

Soyayya da dangantaka

INFP (P): Wataƙila kuna kawo yin abu nan take da nishaɗi, kuma wataƙila kuna ƙin dangantaka mai cike da jadawali.
ISTJ (J): Wataƙila kuna son tsare-tsaren tare da hasashen abubuwa, kuma kuna nuna jajircewa ta hanyar cika ƙananan alkawura.

Abin da bincike ya danganta da kowane gefe

P · Mai sassauci (INFP)

Ƙarancin ƙwazo yana da alaƙa da jinkirta abubuwa da halaye masu haɗari ga lafiya (abinci, motsa jiki, shaye-shaye).^[9]^[10]
A dukkan ayyuka, ƙarancin ƙwazo a matsakaici yana hasashen ƙarancin ƙwazon aiki.^[2]

J · Mai tsari (ISTJ)

Daga cikin sifofin hali, ƙwazo shi ne mai hasashen ƙwazon aiki mafi daidaito a dukkan rukunonin ayyukan da aka bincika.^[2]
A makarantar sakandare da jami’a, yana da alaƙa da makin karatu da ƙarfi kamar basira.^[11]

Matsakaita ne a cikin mutane da yawa. Tasiri irin wannan gaskiya ne amma yawanci ƙarami ne, don haka yana sauya yiwuwa ga rukuni kuma yana faɗin kaɗan game da kowane mutum guda.

Dalilin da ya sa mutane suke rikita P da J

Ƙwazo yakan ƙaru daga farkon girma zuwa tsakiyar shekaru, don haka P na kan iyaka a shekarunku na samartaka ko ashirin zai iya komawa J daga baya.^[8]

Tambayoyin tunani don P ko J (tambayoyin da za a yi tunani a kai, ba gwaji ko maki ba)

Shin wurin aikinku, akwatin imel ko kalandarku yawanci suna cikin tsari (J), ko kuna tafiyar da abubuwa lafiya cikin ɗan hargitsi (P)?
Idan ranar ƙarshe tana da sauran makonni biyu, kuna farawa da wuri kuma ku tafi a hankali (J), ko kuna yin yawancin aikin kusa da ranar ƙarshe (P)?
A tafiya, kuna son shiri na kowace rana (J), ko kun fi son yanke shawara yayin da kuke tafiya (P)?

Ku amsa bisa abin da kuke yawan yi, ba abin da kuke son yi ba. Idan amsoshinku sun rabu daidai, wataƙila kuna kusa da tsakiya a wannan sifa.

Abin da INFP da ISTJ suke tarayya a kai

Harafin da ke ƙasa shi ne abin tarayya. Ko wane nau’i ne ku, waɗannan sassan bayanan duka biyu ya kamata su dace da ku.

Son jama’a

I · Mai son kaɗaici

Kun fi son ƙananan taruka da wurare masu natsuwa, kuma yawanci kuna tunani kafin ku yi magana. Son kaɗaici ba ɗaya yake da jin kunya ko damuwa ba. Waɗannan suna cikin wata sifa dabam (natsuwar zuciya).

Dalilin da ya sa sakamakonku zai iya juyawa tsakanin INFP da ISTJ

Sifofin hali suna ci gaba kuma yawancin mutane suna samun maki kusa da tsakiya. Rarrabuwar maki tana da nauyi a tsakiya, ba a raba ta zuwa sansani biyu ba, har a ma’aunan gargajiya na haruffa huɗu.^[12]^[13]
Don haka ƙaramin kuskuren awo na yau da kullum ya isa ya juya harafi ga duk wanda yake kusa da layin rabuwa. Rashin daidaiton nau’i idan aka sake gwaji yana daga cikin manyan sukar da aka wallafa game da gwaje-gwajen nau’i masu haruffa huɗu.^[14]
Makin da ke ƙasa yana da daidaito sosai; raba maki mai ci gaba zuwa akwatuna biyu ne yake sa haruffan su zama marasa tabbas.^[15]
Samun INFP wani lokaci da ISTJ wani lokaci yana nufin haruffa uku sun canza tsakanin gwaje-gwaje. Kowane harafi yana juyawa da kansa, don haka wannan yawanci yana nufin wasu daga cikin sifofinku suna kusa da matsakaici, ko kun amsa kuna tunanin yanayi dabam-dabam (aiki ko gida, mako mai kyau ko marar kyau).
A gwajin 64 Types, ana ba da rahoton kowace sifa a matsayin percentile idan aka kwatanta da amsoshi na gaske. Duk sifar da take cikin maki 10 daga percentile na 50 ana yi mata alamar kan iyaka, kuma ana nuna muku lambar da za ku samu idan aka juya wannan harafi. Bisa ma’ana, kashi 20% na mutane suna tsakanin percentile na 40 da na 60 a kowace sifa.
Sauyi na gaske ma yana da muhimmanci: a matsakaici mutane suna ƙara ƙwazo tsakanin shekaru 20 zuwa 40, don haka sakamakon J/P zai iya sauyawa a cikin shekaru saboda dalilan da ba su da alaƙa da gwajin.^[8]

INFP da ISTJ a aiki da soyayya

Bambance-bambancen da ke sama sun fi bayyana a aiki da dangantaka. Don hoton sana’a, ga fannonin sha’awa uku da kowane nau’i yakan fi karkata zuwa gare su, da yadda haruffan da suka bambanta suke karkatar da su:

INFP

Karkatar sha’awa da aka saba gani: Na fasaha, Na bincike, Na zahiri

ISTJ

Karkatar sha’awa da aka saba gani: Na tsari, Na zahiri, Na bincike

N ko S: gefen N (INFP) yana da alaƙa da ƙarin sha’awar aikin fasaha da bincike fiye da gefen S (ISTJ).^[3]
F ko T: gefen F (INFP) yana da alaƙa da ƙarin sha’awar aikin zamantakewa (taimako, koyarwa, kulawa) fiye da gefen T (ISTJ).^[3]
P ko J: gefen J (ISTJ) yana da alaƙa da ƙarin sha’awar aikin tsari (bayanai, matakai, daidaito) fiye da gefen P (INFP).^[3]

Waɗannan karkatar sha’awa sun fito ne daga alaƙoƙin nazarce-nazarce tsakanin Big Five da sha’awar sana’a. Alaƙoƙin matsakaita ne, don haka auna sha’awa kai tsaye ya fi hasashensu daga nau’i.^[3]

Aiki da sana’a

INFP a wurin aiki · ISTJ a wurin aiki

Soyayya da dangantaka

INFP a soyayya · ISTJ a soyayya

Abota

INFP a abota · ISTJ a abota

Ƙarfi, rauni da ci gaba

INFP: ƙarfi da rauni · ISTJ: ƙarfi da rauni

Ku gano wanda kuke: ku yi gwajin kyauta

Gwajin 64 Types yana ba ku percentile a kowace sifa, yana yi wa haruffan kan iyaka alama, kuma yana ƙara sifofi biyu da gwaje-gwajen haruffa huɗu suke rasawa. Tambayoyi 62, kusan minti 8, ba rajista.

Ku yi gwajin kyauta

Tambayoyin da ake yawan yi

Mene ne bambanci tsakanin INFP da ISTJ?

Sun bambanta a haruffa uku: Buɗaɗɗen tunani (INFP N, ISTJ S); Sauƙin kai (INFP F, ISTJ T); Ƙwazo (INFP P, ISTJ J). Suna tarayya a I (mai son kaɗaici). Kowane harafi sifa ce dabam mai ci gaba, don haka bambance-bambancen suna taruwa ne maimakon su samar da irin mutane biyu kafaffu.

Ta yaya zan san ko ni INFP ne ko ISTJ?

Ku mai da hankali ne kawai kan haruffan da suka bambanta (N/S, F/T da J/P). Ku yi tunani kan abin da kuke yi da gaske a yanayi na yau da kullum, ku tambayi wanda ya san ku sosai, kuma ku yi gwajin da yake ba da percentile na kowace sifa maimakon harafi kawai. Idan sifa ta fito kusa da percentile na 50, kuna kusa da matsakaici a cikinta kuma nau’o’in biyu za su bayyana ku a wani ɓangare.

Me ya sa nake samun INFP a wani gwaji da ISTJ a wani?

Sifofin hali suna ci gaba kuma yawancin mutane suna samun maki kusa da tsakiya, don haka ƙananan bambance-bambance a yadda kuke amsawa za su iya juya harafi. Sauyin nau’i idan aka sake gwaji yana daga cikin matsalolin gwaje-gwajen haruffa huɗu da aka fi rubutawa. Tun da INFP da ISTJ sun bambanta da haruffa uku, wataƙila kuna kusa da tsakiya a sifofi da dama, ko kun amsa kuna tunanin yanayi dabam-dabam.

Shin INFP da ISTJ sun dace da juna?

Wannan tambaya ce dabam da wanda kuke. A manyan bincike, kamanceceniyar halin masoya biyu ba ta bayyana kusan komai ba bayan sifofin kowannensu; natsuwar zuciya, sauƙin kai da ƙwazo na kowane masoyi sun fi muhimmanci. Shafin dacewar INFP da ISTJ yana bayani kan soyayya, abota da aiki ga wannan haɗi.

Binciken dacewa da aka ambata a sama: kamanceceniya ta bayyana kaɗan ne bayan sifofin kowane masoyi^[16]; sifofin kowane masoyi sun fi muhimmanci.^[17]

Ku zurfafa

Bayanin INFP · Bayanin ISTJ · Dacewar INFP da ISTJ

Kwatance makamantan wannan

ENFP vs INFP · bambanci a son jama’a INFP vs ISFP · bambanci a buɗaɗɗen tunani INFP vs INTP · bambanci a sauƙin kai INFJ vs INFP · bambanci a ƙwazo ESTJ vs ISTJ · bambanci a son jama’a INTJ vs ISTJ · bambanci a buɗaɗɗen tunani ISFJ vs ISTJ · bambanci a sauƙin kai ISTJ vs ISTP · bambanci a ƙwazo

Dukkan kwatancen nau’o’i

Majiyoyi

Feist, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(4), 290–309.
Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44(1), 1–26.
Larson, L. M., Rottinghaus, P. J., & Borgen, F. H. (2002). Meta-analyses of Big Six interests and Big Five personality factors. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61(2), 217–239.
Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2007). Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11(2), 150–166.
Jensen-Campbell, L. A., & Graziano, W. G. (2001). Agreeableness as a moderator of interpersonal conflict. Journal of Personality, 69(2), 323–362.
Selfhout, M., Burk, W., Branje, S., Denissen, J., van Aken, M., & Meeus, W. (2010). Emerging late adolescent friendship networks and Big Five personality traits: A social network approach. Journal of Personality, 78(2), 509–538.
Judge, T. A., Livingston, B. A., & Hurst, C. (2012). Do nice guys—and gals—really finish last? The joint effects of sex and agreeableness on income. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(2), 390–407.
Roberts, B. W., Walton, K. E., & Viechtbauer, W. (2006). Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 132(1), 1–25.
Steel, P. (2007). The nature of procrastination: A meta-analytic and theoretical review of quintessential self-regulatory failure. Psychological Bulletin, 133(1), 65–94.
Bogg, T., & Roberts, B. W. (2004). Conscientiousness and health-related behaviors: A meta-analysis of the leading behavioral contributors to mortality. Psychological Bulletin, 130(6), 887–919.
Poropat, A. E. (2009). A meta-analysis of the five-factor model of personality and academic performance. Psychological Bulletin, 135(2), 322–338.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1989). Reinterpreting the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator from the perspective of the five-factor model of personality. Journal of Personality, 57(1), 17–40.
Bess, T. L., & Harvey, R. J. (2002). Bimodal score distributions and the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator: Fact or artifact? Journal of Personality Assessment, 78(1), 176–186.
Pittenger, D. J. (2005). Cautionary comments regarding the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 57(3), 210–221.
Capraro, R. M., & Capraro, M. M. (2002). Myers-Briggs Type Indicator score reliability across studies: A meta-analytic reliability generalization study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 62(4), 590–602.
Dyrenforth, P. S., Kashy, D. A., Donnellan, M. B., & Lucas, R. E. (2010). Predicting relationship and life satisfaction from personality in nationally representative samples from three countries: The relative importance of actor, partner, and similarity effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(4), 690–702.
Malouff, J. M., Thorsteinsson, E. B., Schutte, N. S., Bhullar, N., & Rooke, S. E. (2010). The five-factor model of personality and relationship satisfaction of intimate partners: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 44(1), 124–127.