Nau’in hali
ESFJ-RM
Mai Karɓar Baƙi · Mai Saurin Ji kuma Mai Gaskiya
Mai son jama’a, mai aiki da zahiri, mai kulawa, mai tsari.
- EMai son jama’aSon jama’a
- SMai aiki da zahiriBuɗaɗɗen tunani
- FMai tausayiSauƙin kai
- JMai tsariƘwazo
- RMai saurin jiNatsuwar zuciya
- MMai tawali’uGaskiya da tawali’u
Ku ne wannan? Ku yi gwajin kyauta · kusan minti 8, ba rajista
A taƙaice
Kuna da karimci, kuna son jama’a, ana iya dogara da ku kuma kuna da gaskiya. Kuna jin daɗin tara mutane wuri ɗaya da tabbatar da cewa an kula da kowa, kuma kuna daraja al’ada da aminci mai ɗorewa.
Kuna jin motsin rai da ƙarfi kuma kuna saurin lura da damuwa (natsuwar zuciya ƙarama), kuma kuna da tawali’u da adalci (gaskiya da tawali’u masu yawa). Kuna damuwa da yin abin da yake daidai, wani lokaci har ku yi ta tunani a kansa.
Haruffa shida
Mutane suna ba ku kuzari, kuna magana cikin sauƙi kuma kuna saurin shiga hira.
Kun fi son abubuwa na zahiri, waɗanda aka tabbatar kuma masu amfani, kuma kuna amincewa da gogewa fiye da ka’ida.
Kuna da karimci, kulawa da taimako, kuma kuna la’akari da yadda wasu suke ji.
Kuna tsarawa, ana iya dogara da ku kuma kuna lura da ƙananan bayanai, kuma kuna son kammala abin da kuka fara.
Kuna jin motsin rai da ƙarfi kuma kuna saurin lura da damuwa da haɗari. Fargaba da sauyin yanayin zuciya suna zuwa muku cikin sauƙi fiye da yawancin mutane.
Kuna da gaskiya da adalci, matsayi da alatu ba sa jan hankalinku, kuma ba ku ganin kun fi wasu.
Yadda sifofinku suke haɗuwa
- Mutane suna ba ku kuzari, amma kuna saurin jin abubuwa a rai, don haka wataƙila kuna neman mutane idan kuna cikin damuwa. Ku zaɓi mutanen da suke kwantar muku da hankali, ba waɗanda suke ƙara muku fargaba ba.
- Manyan ma’auni tare da ƙarfin ji na iya kawo damuwar son kamala. Ku yanke shawarar abin da yake “ya isa” kafin ku fara.
Ƙarfi
- Daga cikin sifofin hali, ƙwazo shi ne mai hasashen ƙwazon aiki mafi daidaito a dukkan rukunonin ayyukan da aka bincika.[1]
- A makarantar sakandare da jami’a, yana da alaƙa da makin karatu da ƙarfi kamar basira.[2]
- A matsakaici, mutane masu yawan ƙwazo suna rayuwa tsawon lokaci, wani ɓangare saboda kyawawan halaye na lafiya.[3][4]
- Wannan sifa tana sauyawa sosai. A matsakaici, mutane suna ƙara samun natsuwar zuciya yayin da suke ƙara shekaru.[5]
- Ana iya yin tasiri a kanta. A wani nazari na tsari kan binciken tsoma baki (yawancinsu na jinyar tunani), natsuwar zuciya ce ta fi sauyawa a cikin dukkan sifofi.[6]
- Son jama’a ita ce sifar da ta fi daidaito wajen alaƙa da wanda yake fitowa a matsayin shugaba a cikin ƙungiyoyi.[7]
- A matsakaici, masu son jama’a suna ba da rahoton ƙarin jin daɗin rai.[8]
- Kuna saurin gina hanyar sadarwa da mutane, wanda yake taimakawa ga damammakin da suke zuwa ta hanyar shawarwarin mutane.
- Kuna mai da hankali kan abin da yake aiki, kuma ba kasafai sabon abu yake jan ku ba saboda kawai sabo ne.
- Sau da yawa kuna kawo hangen zahiri mai natsuwa a cikin ƙungiyoyin da ra’ayoyi marasa zahiri suka ɗauke hankalinsu.
- Mutane masu yawan sauƙin kai suna amfani da hanyoyi masu gina jiki a rikici, kuma ba kasafai suke ƙara rura shi ba.[9]
- Ana yawan zaɓar mutane masu yawan sauƙin kai a matsayin abokai.[10]
- Daga cikin manyan sifofi, gaskiya da tawali’u suna daga cikin masu hasashen halin adalci da haɗin kai mafi ƙarfi a wasannin tattalin arziki.[11]
- Gaskiya da tawali’u su ne masu hasashe mafi ƙarfi a tsarin HEXACO na ƙarancin halaye marasa kyau a wurin aiki (sata, zagon ƙasa, ƙauracewa aiki).[12]
Abubuwan lura
- Yawan saurin damuwa yana da alaƙa mai ƙarfi da cututtukan fargaba da baƙin ciki mai tsanani da kuma shaye-shaye. Idan kuna cikin wani lokaci mai wahala yanzu, taimakon ƙwararru yana aiki.[13][6]
- Saurin damuwa ita ce alaƙa mafi ƙarfi (mara kyau) tsakanin hali da gamsuwa da aiki.[14]
- Manyan ma’auni za su iya zama taurin kai idan tsare-tsare suka canza. Ku bar sarari a jadawalinku.
- Wataƙila kuna raina nasarorinku ko guje wa tattaunawar ciniki. Kare kanku cikin adalci ba girman kai ba ne.
- Wataƙila ladan matsayi (muƙamai, alawus-alawus) ba sa motsa ku. Ku zaɓi aikin da yake ba da ladan manufa ko farin cikin aikin da aka yi da kyau.
- Sauƙin kai yana da alaƙa ta kishiyar juna da samun kuɗi, kuma tasirin ya fi girma a wajen maza.[15]
- Wataƙila kuna ganin yana da wuya ku ce a’a ko ku tsaya daram a tattaunawar ciniki. Ku shirya abin da kuke so ku nema tun da wuri.
- A wani bincike na fili, manajoji masu son jama’a sun sami sakamako mafi rauni wajen jagorantar ƙungiyoyi masu ƙwazo, saboda ba su buɗe kunne sosai ga ra’ayoyin ’yan ƙungiya ba.[16]
- A wani binciken sayarwa, mutane masu matsakaicin son jama’a (“ambiverts”) sun fi sayarwa fiye da masu tsananin son jama’a, waɗanda wataƙila an ga kamar suna tilastawa.[17]
- Buɗaɗɗen tunani yana hasashen nasara a horo. A fannonin da suke sauyawa da sauri, ku yi tsammanin ƙarin ƙoƙarin koyo.[1]
- Wataƙila kuna saurin ƙin ra’ayoyin da ba ku saba da su ba. Ku fara gwada su a ƙaramin mataki kafin ku yanke shawara.
Aiki da sana’a
Hali yana hasashen sha’awa kaɗan ne kawai, don haka ku ɗauki waɗannan a matsayin wurin farawa. Sha’awarku, ƙwarewarku da ƙa’idodinku sun fi nau’i muhimmanci.
Waɗanne sana’o’i ne suka dace da sha’awarku? Gwajin sana’a (da Turanci) →
- Ƙwazo yana da alaƙa da sha’awar ayyukan tsari (bayanai, matakai, daidaito).[18]
- Masu kafa kamfani suna da ƙwazo fiye da manajoji, kuma ƙwazo yana da alaƙa da shugabanci.[19][7]
- Son jama’a yana hasashen ƙwazon aiki musamman a matsayin gudanarwa da sayarwa.[1]
- Son jama’a yana da matsakaiciyar alaƙa da sha’awar kasuwanci da kafa kamfani, kuma alaƙarsa da sha’awar zamantakewa ta fi rauni.[18]
- Ƙarancin buɗaɗɗen tunani yana da alaƙa da ƙarancin sha’awar ayyukan fasaha da na bincike. Sau da yawa matsayi na zahiri, na aikin hannu da masu bin ƙa’idoji sun fi dacewa.[18]
- Sauƙin kai yana da alaƙa da sha’awar zamantakewa (koyarwa, taimako, hidima).[18]
- Sauƙin kai yana hasashen ƙwazon aiki gabaɗaya da rauni ne kawai a ayyuka dabam-dabam.[1]
- Hasashen yanayin aiki, iko kan yawan aiki da shugaban da yake goyon bayanku sun fi muhimmanci a gare ku. Ku yi la’akari da su lokacin zaɓar aiki.
- Kuna iya yin nasara inda gaskiya take da muhimmanci: binciken kuɗi, bin ƙa’idoji, kiwon lafiya, ɗa’ar bincike, aikin gwamnati da sasanci.
Soyayya da dangantaka
- Saurin damuwa yana hasashen ƙarancin gamsuwa da ɗorewa a dangantaka. Idan kuka faɗi abin da yake damun ku (“ina cikin damuwa, ban yi fushi da kai ba”), kuna taimaka wa masoyinku ya mayar da martani yadda ya dace.[20][21]
- Yawan sauƙin kai na masoyi yana da alaƙa da ƙarin gamsuwa a dangantaka.[20]
- Ƙwazon masoyi yana da alaƙa da ƙarin gamsuwa a dangantaka.[20]
- Yawan gaskiya da tawali’u yana nufin ƙarancin haɗuwa da sifofin yaudara na “dark triad”, waɗanda suke lalata aminci.[22]
- Son jama’a na masoyi yana da raunanniyar alaƙa da gamsuwa a dangantaka. Bai kai muhimmancin natsuwar zuciya, sauƙin kai ko ƙwazo ba.[20]
- Idan masoyinku ya fi son kaɗaici, ku yarda da wuri kan yawan lokacin zamantakewa da kowannenku yake so. Wannan bambanci ne da aka saba gani kuma ana iya warware shi.
- A matsakaici, bambance-bambancen buɗaɗɗen tunani tsakanin masoya suna da ƙaramin tasiri a kan gamsuwa.[20][23]
Abota
- Masu son jama’a suna saurin samun sababbin abokai kuma a ƙarshe suna da faffaɗan da’irar abokai.[10][24]
- Babbar hanyar sadarwa ba ta tabbatar da abota ta kurkusa ba. Ku ware lokaci kuma don haɗuwa ɗaya da ɗaya.
- Sauƙin kai yana taimakawa wajen ginawa da riƙe abota, saboda mutane suna jin aminci idan suna tare da ku.[24]
- Mutane suna amincewa da ku da sirrinsu kuma suna dogara da adalcinku, mabuɗin abota ta kurkusa.
- Ku ne abokin da yake tunawa kuma yake zuwa. Kasancewa abin dogaro shi ne tushen aminci mai natsuwa.
- Sau da yawa kuna lura idan abokai suna cikin wahala. Ku zaɓi abokan da su ma za su iya karɓar yadda kuke ji.
- Sau da yawa ana gina abotarku a kan ayyukan da kuke yi tare (wasanni, gyaran abubuwa, girki).
Damuwa da walwala
- Saurin damuwa shi ne mai hasashe mara kyau mafi ƙarfi na hali ga walwala. Barci, motsa jiki da jinyar da ta dogara da shaida (misali jinyar tunani da ɗabi’a, CBT) suna kawo babban bambanci.[25][6]
- Son jama’a yana daga cikin alaƙoƙi mafi ƙarfi tsakanin hali da jin daɗin rai da gamsuwa da rayuwa.[25]
- Ƙwazo yana da kyakkyawar alaƙa da gamsuwa da rayuwa.[25]
- Sauƙin kai yana da matsakaiciyar alaƙa da walwala.[25]
- Gabaɗaya, gaskiya da tawali’u suna da alaƙa da sakamako masu amfani ga al’umma da na ɗabi’a ta gari a fannoni da yawa na rayuwa.[26]
- Buɗaɗɗen tunani yana da raunanniyar alaƙa ne kawai da gamsuwa da rayuwa. Kasancewa mai aiki da zahiri ba ya rage walwalarku.[25]
Ci gaba
- A binciken sauya sifofi da gangan, ƙoƙari na da gangan don ƙara natsuwa ya kawo sauyi da ake iya aunawa.[27]
- Ku tsara da gangan lokacin da babu wani shiri a cikinsa. Sassauci ma ƙwarewa ce.
- Ku ɗauki tsayawa kan matsayinku a matsayin ƙwarewa. Kirki da faɗin abin da kuke buƙata a fili suna tafiya tare sosai.
- Ku saba da yin tambayoyi kafin ku faɗi ra’ayinku. Wannan yana taimakawa musamman a ƙungiyoyi masu ƙwazo.[16]
- Kafin kimanta aiki da tattaunawar ciniki, ku rubuta gudummawarku don kada tawali’unku ya ɓoye ta.
- Ku ƙara sabuwar ƙwarewa ko sabon abu ɗaya a lokaci ɗaya, kuma ku haɗa shi da wani abu mai amfani da kuke yi tuni.
Yaya ƙarfin waɗannan sakamako yake?
Alaƙar da ke tsakanin sifofi da sakamakon rayuwa da aka ambata a nan gaskiya ce kuma ana iya maimaita ta, amma kowacce ita kaɗai ƙarama ce. Alaƙar da aka saba gani ita ce r ≈ 0.10–0.30, wato sifofi suna sauya yiwuwa ne maimakon su yanke sakamako. Wani babban aikin maimaita bincike ya tabbatar da kusan kashi 87% na alaƙar da aka gwada, yawanci da tasiri ɗan ƙasa da wanda aka ruwaito tun farko.[30] Layukan da ba su da majiya shawarwari ne na aiki, ba sakamakon bincike ba.
Majiyoyi
- Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44(1), 1–26.
- Poropat, A. E. (2009). A meta-analysis of the five-factor model of personality and academic performance. Psychological Bulletin, 135(2), 322–338.
- Kern, M. L., & Friedman, H. S. (2008). Do conscientious individuals live longer? A quantitative review. Health Psychology, 27(5), 505–512.
- Bogg, T., & Roberts, B. W. (2004). Conscientiousness and health-related behaviors: A meta-analysis of the leading behavioral contributors to mortality. Psychological Bulletin, 130(6), 887–919.
- Roberts, B. W., Walton, K. E., & Viechtbauer, W. (2006). Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 132(1), 1–25.
- Roberts, B. W., Luo, J., Briley, D. A., Chow, P. I., Su, R., & Hill, P. L. (2017). A systematic review of personality trait change through intervention. Psychological Bulletin, 143(2), 117–141.
- Judge, T. A., Bono, J. E., Ilies, R., & Gerhardt, M. W. (2002). Personality and leadership: A qualitative and quantitative review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 765–780.
- Lucas, R. E., & Fujita, F. (2000). Factors influencing the relation between extraversion and pleasant affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 1039–1056.
- Jensen-Campbell, L. A., & Graziano, W. G. (2001). Agreeableness as a moderator of interpersonal conflict. Journal of Personality, 69(2), 323–362.
- Selfhout, M., Burk, W., Branje, S., Denissen, J., van Aken, M., & Meeus, W. (2010). Emerging late adolescent friendship networks and Big Five personality traits: A social network approach. Journal of Personality, 78(2), 509–538.
- Thielmann, I., Spadaro, G., & Balliet, D. (2020). Personality and prosocial behavior: A theoretical framework and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 146(1), 30–90.
- Pletzer, J. L., Bentvelzen, M., Oostrom, J. K., & de Vries, R. E. (2019). A meta-analysis of the relations between personality and workplace deviance: Big Five versus HEXACO. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 112, 369–383.
- Kotov, R., Gamez, W., Schmidt, F., & Watson, D. (2010). Linking "big" personality traits to anxiety, depressive, and substance use disorders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136(5), 768–821.
- Judge, T. A., Heller, D., & Mount, M. K. (2002). Five-factor model of personality and job satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 530–541.
- Judge, T. A., Livingston, B. A., & Hurst, C. (2012). Do nice guys—and gals—really finish last? The joint effects of sex and agreeableness on income. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(2), 390–407.
- Grant, A. M., Gino, F., & Hofmann, D. A. (2011). Reversing the extraverted leadership advantage: The role of employee proactivity. Academy of Management Journal, 54(3), 528–550.
- Grant, A. M. (2013). Rethinking the extraverted sales ideal: The ambivert advantage. Psychological Science, 24(6), 1024–1030.
- Larson, L. M., Rottinghaus, P. J., & Borgen, F. H. (2002). Meta-analyses of Big Six interests and Big Five personality factors. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61(2), 217–239.
- Zhao, H., & Seibert, S. E. (2006). The Big Five personality dimensions and entrepreneurial status: A meta-analytical review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(2), 259–271.
- Malouff, J. M., Thorsteinsson, E. B., Schutte, N. S., Bhullar, N., & Rooke, S. E. (2010). The five-factor model of personality and relationship satisfaction of intimate partners: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 44(1), 124–127.
- Karney, B. R., & Bradbury, T. N. (1995). The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: A review of theory, method, and research. Psychological Bulletin, 118(1), 3–34.
- Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2005). Psychopathy, Machiavellianism, and narcissism in the Five-Factor Model and the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Individual Differences, 38(7), 1571–1582.
- Dyrenforth, P. S., Kashy, D. A., Donnellan, M. B., & Lucas, R. E. (2010). Predicting relationship and life satisfaction from personality in nationally representative samples from three countries: The relative importance of actor, partner, and similarity effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(4), 690–702.
- Harris, K., & Vazire, S. (2016). On friendship development and the Big Five personality traits. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 10(11), 647–667.
- Steel, P., Schmidt, J., & Shultz, J. (2008). Refining the relationship between personality and subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 134(1), 138–161.
- Zettler, I., Thielmann, I., Hilbig, B. E., & Moshagen, M. (2020). The nomological net of the HEXACO model of personality: A large-scale meta-analytic investigation. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(3), 723–760.
- Hudson, N. W., & Fraley, R. C. (2015). Volitional personality trait change: Can people choose to change their personality traits? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(3), 490–507.
- McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1989). Reinterpreting the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator from the perspective of the five-factor model of personality. Journal of Personality, 57(1), 17–40.
- Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2007). Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11(2), 150–166.
- Soto, C. J. (2019). How replicable are links between personality traits and consequential life outcomes? The Life Outcomes of Personality Replication Project. Psychological Science, 30(5), 711–727.