ENTJ + ESFJ
ENTJ da ESFJ: dacewa a soyayya, abota da aiki
ENTJ da ESFJ suna tarayya a haruffa 2 cikin 4, E (mai son jama’a) da J (mai tsari), kuma sun bambanta a buɗaɗɗen tunani da sauƙin kai. Kamanceceniya ita kaɗai tana hasashen kaɗan ne; matakan kowane mutum a wasu ’yan muhimman sifofi sun fi muhimmanci.
Abin da suke tarayya a kai da inda suka bambanta
Ku duka biyu kuna samun kuzari daga mutane da ayyuka. Ku yi tsammanin cikakken jadawalin zamantakewa da yanke shawara cikin sauri yayin tattaunawa.
Yana daidai da harafin gargajiya na E/I, wanda yake da alaƙa mai ƙarfi da son jama’a na Big Five.
Ɗaya yana bin sababbin ra’ayoyi da abubuwa, ɗayan kuma yana amincewa da abin da aka tabbatar na zahiri. Kowannenku zai iya faɗaɗa duniyar ɗan’uwansa, muddin babu wanda yake ɗaukar salonsa a matsayin hanya ɗaya tilo daidai.
Yana daidai da harafin N/S, wanda yake da alaƙa mai ƙarfi da buɗaɗɗen tunani na Big Five.
Ɗaya yana gabatar da jituwa, ɗayan kuma gaskiya. Yawancin saɓani a nan game da salon magana ne, ba abin da ake faɗa ba.
Yana daidai da harafin F/T (F = sauƙin kai mafi yawa). Alaƙarsa da MBTI matsakaiciya ce.
Ku duka biyu kuna son tsare-tsare, tsari da cika alkawari. Ku yi tsammanin rayuwar tare mai kyakkyawan tsari, kuma ku yi hattara da taurin kai idan shiri ya lalace.
Yana daidai da harafin J/P (J = ƙwazo mafi yawa). Alaƙarsa da MBTI matsakaiciya ce.
Abin da bayanai suka nuna: ENTJ da ESFJ
Daga namu nazarin mutane 19,718 da suka amsa kalaman IPIP na Big Five na jama’a (Open Psychometrics), aka ba su maki daidai da wannan gwaji.
| Sifa | ENTJ | ESFJ |
|---|---|---|
| Son jama’a | 74 | 75 |
| Buɗaɗɗen tunani | 74 | 29 |
| Sauƙin kai | 29 | 76 |
| Ƙwazo | 74 | 76 |
| Natsuwar zuciya | 59 | 60 |
| Kaso a samfurin | 4.4% | 6.8% |
Lambobin matsakaicin percentile ne (50 = tsakiyar samfurin). Haruffa huɗu suna raba kowace sifa a tsakiya, don haka bisa tsarinsu waɗannan matsakaita suna kusa da 75 ko 25. Natsuwar zuciya ba ta cikin haruffa huɗu, don haka tana nuna bambance-bambance na gaske tsakanin nau’o’i.
Natsuwar zuciya ita ce sifar da haruffa huɗu suke barinta a waje. Mutanen ENTJ suna da matsakaicin percentile 59 a cikinta (66% suna da harafin C, mai natsuwa); mutanen ESFJ suna da matsakaicin 60 (68%).
Idan aka haɗa mutumin ENTJ da mutumin ESFJ da aka zaɓa ba da tsari ba, a kashi 45% na lokuta duka biyu za su sami harafin C (mai natsuwa), a kashi 11% kuma duka biyu harafin R (mai saurin ji). Natsuwar zuciyar kowane masoyi tana daga cikin abubuwan da suka fi bayyana wajen hasashen gamsuwa a dangantaka.[2]
Matsakaita suna bayyana rukunoni ne, ba ku ba. Mutane da yawa na kowane nau’i suna samun maki mai nisa da su, shi ya sa gwajin yake nuna percentile ɗinku na kanku.
ENTJ da ESFJ a soyayya
Ƙarfi
- Masoyi ESFJ yawanci ya fi yawa a Sauƙin kai (F), kuma hakan yana amfanar ku duka biyu. Yawan sauƙin kai yana hasashen saɓani mai gina jiki da masoya masu ƙarin gamsuwa.[2][3]
- Nau’o’in biyu yawanci suna sama da matsakaici a Ƙwazo (harafin J). Ƙwazo yana hasashen gamsuwar masoyi. Ƙarancin ƙwazo yana da alaƙa da rashin aminci a yankuna dabam-dabam na duniya.[2][4]
- Nau’o’in biyu yawanci suna sama da matsakaici a Son jama’a (harafin E). Son jama’a na masoyi yana da raunanniyar alaƙa da gamsuwa.[2]
Abubuwan da za su iya kawo saɓani
- Buɗaɗɗen tunani (ENTJ ya fi zama mai hasashe, ESFJ ya fi zama mai aiki da zahiri): ku yi tsammanin saɓani game da sababbin abubuwa ko al’ada a yadda kuke ciyar da lokacinku tare.
- Sauƙin kai (ESFJ ya fi zama mai tausayi, ENTJ ya fi zama mai tsauri): ku yi tsammanin saɓani game da yadda ake tafiyar da rashin jituwa: a faɗe shi kai tsaye ko a ƙyale shi.
Shawarwarin aiki (shawara, ba sakamakon bincike ba)
- Ɗaya yana neman sababbin abubuwa, ɗayan kuma yana son abin da aka saba. Ku riƙa musanya wajen zaɓi kuma ku kiyaye al’ada ɗaya da kuke so ku duka.
- Salon saɓani dabam-dabam: ɗaya yana faɗa, ɗayan kuma yana ƙyale abu. Ku yarda cewa faɗin matsala da wuri kulawa ne, ba hari ba.
ENTJ da ESFJ a matsayin abokai
Ƙarfi
- Aboki ESFJ yawanci ya fi yawa a Sauƙin kai (F), kuma hakan yana amfanar ku duka biyu. Ana yawan zaɓar mutane masu yawan sauƙin kai a matsayin abokai, kuma abotarsu tana ƙara ɗorewa.[5][6]
- Nau’o’in biyu yawanci suna sama da matsakaici a Son jama’a (harafin E). Son jama’a yana hasashen samun abokai da sauri da kuma da yawa.[5][6]
Abubuwan da za su iya kawo saɓani
- Buɗaɗɗen tunani (ENTJ ya fi zama mai hasashe, ESFJ ya fi zama mai aiki da zahiri): ku yi tsammanin saɓani game da abin da yake sa lokaci ya yi daɗi: sababbin ra’ayoyi da abubuwa, ko ayyuka na zahiri da aka saba.
- Sauƙin kai (ESFJ ya fi zama mai tausayi, ENTJ ya fi zama mai tsauri): ku yi tsammanin saɓani game da salon magana, domin gaskiya za ta iya ɓata wa mai taushin rai rai.
Shawarwarin aiki (shawara, ba sakamakon bincike ba)
- Ku riƙa musanya tsakanin tattauna ra’ayoyi da yin ayyuka na zahiri tare.
- Ɗaya yana magana kai tsaye, ɗayan kuma yana da hankali. Zai taimaka idan wanda ya fi magana kai tsaye ya fara da abin da yake daraja.
ENTJ da ESFJ a wurin aiki
Ƙarfi
- Nau’o’in biyu yawanci suna sama da matsakaici a Ƙwazo (harafin J). Ƙwazo shi ne mai hasashe na hali mafi daidaito ga ƙwazon aiki.[7]
Abubuwan da za su iya kawo saɓani
- Buɗaɗɗen tunani (ENTJ ya fi zama mai hasashe, ESFJ ya fi zama mai aiki da zahiri): ku yi tsammanin saɓani game da ko za a gwada sabuwar hanya ko a tsaya a kan wadda aka tabbatar.
- Sauƙin kai (ESFJ ya fi zama mai tausayi, ENTJ ya fi zama mai tsauri): ku yi tsammanin saɓani game da yadda ake ba da kuma karɓar ra’ayi kan aiki.
Shawarwarin aiki (shawara, ba sakamakon bincike ba)
- Ɗaya yana kawo sababbin hanyoyi, ɗayan kuma yana kare wadda aka tabbatar. Ku gwada sauyi a ƙaramin mataki kafin ku yanke shawara.
- Ku raba a fili tsakanin ra’ayi game da aiki da girmama mutum.
Yadda harafi na biyar da na shida suke sauya hoton
Kowane nau’i yana da rassa huɗu. Ƙarin haruffa biyu su ne ainihin waɗanda gwajin haruffa huɗu yake barinsu, kuma ga dangantaka sun fi yawancin haruffa huɗu na asali muhimmanci.
Natsuwar zuciya: C (Mai natsuwa) ko R (Mai saurin ji)
- Natsuwar zuciya (harafi na biyar, C ko R) ba a auna ta a nau’o’in haruffa huɗu, duk da haka tana daga cikin sifofin hali mafi dogaro wajen hasashen gamsuwa da ɗorewar dangantaka. Tana da muhimmanci a kowane mutum: masoyi mai ƙarin natsuwa yana taimakawa, ko da wane nau’i ne ɗayan.[2][8]
- Idan ku duka biyu C ne (masu natsuwa), kuna farawa daga matsayin da shaida ta fi goyon baya. Idan ɗayanku R ne (mai saurin ji), babban haɗarin shi ne damuwa ta koma rikici. Faɗin “ina cikin damuwa ne, ban yi fushi da kai ba” yana taimaka wa ɗayan ya mayar da martani yadda ya dace.
- Idan ku duka biyu R ne, ku yi tsammanin damuwa za ta yaɗu daga ɗayanku zuwa ɗayan. Duk da haka, wannan ita ce sifar da ta fi sauyawa: yawanci mutane suna ƙara natsuwa da shekaru, kuma tana sauyawa ta hanyar da ake iya aunawa da jinya da ƙoƙari na da gangan.[9][10][11]
- A wurin aiki, natsuwar zuciya ita ce alaƙa mafi ƙarfi tsakanin hali da gamsuwa da aiki. Idan ɗayanku R ne, sanar da shi sauye-sauye tun da wuri ba ya da tsada kuma yana taimakawa sosai (shawara ce, ba sakamakon bincike ba).[12]
Gaskiya da tawali’u: M (Mai tawali’u) ko A (Mai buri)
- Gaskiya da tawali’u (harafi na shida, M ko A) suna hasashen halin adalci da haɗin kai inda ake buƙatar aminci, kuma a kan haka ne abota da dangantaka suke tafiya.[13]
- Ƙarancin gaskiya da tawali’u (A) yana kama da sifofin yaudara na “dark triad”, kuma ita ce sifa a tsarin HEXACO da ta fi alaƙa da halaye masu cutarwa a wurin aiki. Idan ku duka biyu M ne, ku duka kuna da sifar da take da alaƙa da adalci; idan ɗayanku A ne, bayyana gaskiya game da kuɗi, yabo da matsayi ya fi muhimmanci.[14][15]
- Ku sani cewa manyan nazarce-nazarce kan gamsuwar masoya sun yi amfani da Big Five, wanda ba shi da wani ɓangare dabam na gaskiya da tawali’u, don haka shaidar wannan harafi a soyayya ba ta kai shaidarsa a kan aminci da haɗin kai ba.[2][16]
Dalilin da ya sa kamanceceniya ba ta da muhimmanci kamar yadda ake zato
- A samfurori na ƙasa daga ƙasashe uku, kamanceceniyar halin masoya biyu ba ta bayyana kusan komai ba bayan sifofin kowannensu.[1]
- Sifofin da suke hasashen ingancin dangantaka da gaske su ne natsuwar zuciya, sauƙin kai da ƙwazo na kowane mutum, kuma waɗannan sifofi suna sauyawa da shekaru da ƙoƙari.[2][9][11]
- Haruffa huɗu suna daidai da sifofin Big Five na gaske, amma T/F da J/P a matsakaici ne kawai, don haka kowane mutum zai iya bambanta da matakan da aka saba gani a nau’insa.[17]
- Alaƙoƙi kamar waɗannan tsakanin sifofi da sakamako ana maimaita su da kyau a bincike, amma kowacce ƙarama ce, kuma yawanci ɗan ƙasa da yadda aka ruwaito tun farko. Suna sauya yiwuwa; ba sa yanke sakamako.[18]
Nau’i matsakaici ne. Ku yi gwajin kyauta, sannan ku gayyaci masoyinku, abokinku ko abokin aikinku don ku ga inda ku duka biyu kuke da gaske a dukkan sifofi shida.
Tambayoyin da ake yawan yi
Shin ENTJ da ESFJ sun dace da juna?
Babu wani bincike da ya nuna cewa wani haɗin nau’o’i ya fi wani dacewa da tabbas, kuma kamanceceniyar hali tana bayyana ƙalilan ne kawai na gamsuwa a dangantaka. ENTJ da ESFJ suna tarayya a haruffa 2 cikin 4. Abubuwan da suka fi hasashe su ne natsuwar zuciya, sauƙin kai da ƙwazo na kowannensu, waɗanda nau’i mai haruffa huɗu yake kama wani ɓangare nasu kawai.
Shin ENTJ da ESFJ masoya ne masu kyau?
Masoyi ESFJ yawanci ya fi yawa a Sauƙin kai (F), kuma hakan yana amfanar ku duka biyu. Yawan sauƙin kai yana hasashen saɓani mai gina jiki da masoya masu ƙarin gamsuwa. Shawarar aiki: Ɗaya yana neman sababbin abubuwa, ɗayan kuma yana son abin da aka saba. Ku riƙa musanya wajen zaɓi kuma ku kiyaye al’ada ɗaya da kuke so ku duka. Ko kowannenku yana da natsuwar zuciya (harafin C/R) yana daga cikin abubuwan hasashe mafi ƙarfi da aka sani, kuma haruffa huɗu ba za su iya nuna shi ba.
Shin ENTJ da ESFJ za su iya zama abokai na kurkusa?
Aboki ESFJ yawanci ya fi yawa a Sauƙin kai (F), kuma hakan yana amfanar ku duka biyu. Ana yawan zaɓar mutane masu yawan sauƙin kai a matsayin abokai, kuma abotarsu tana ƙara ɗorewa. Shawarar aiki: Ku riƙa musanya tsakanin tattauna ra’ayoyi da yin ayyuka na zahiri tare.
Shin ENTJ da ESFJ suna aiki tare da kyau?
Nau’o’in biyu yawanci suna sama da matsakaici a Ƙwazo (harafin J). Ƙwazo shi ne mai hasashe na hali mafi daidaito ga ƙwazon aiki. Gaskiya da tawali’u (harafin M/A) su ne masu hasashe mafi ƙarfi a tsarin HEXACO na ƙarancin halaye masu cutarwa a wurin aiki, don haka yana da kyau a san su ma.
Game da waɗannan nau’o’i
Kuna da tsayuwa kan ra’ayi a gaban jama’a, ra’ayoyi suna motsa ku, kuna magana kai tsaye kuma kuna da tsari sosai. Kuna son jagoranci, kafa manufofi na dogon lokaci da tura abubuwa har su kai ga sakamako. Son jama’a da ƙwazo duka suna da alaƙa da wanda yake fitowa a matsayin shugaba.
Kuna da karimci, kuna son jama’a, ana iya dogara da ku kuma kuna da gaskiya. Kuna jin daɗin tara mutane wuri ɗaya da tabbatar da cewa an kula da kowa, kuma kuna daraja al’ada da aminci mai ɗorewa.
Sauran haɗe-haɗe
ENTJ tare da: INTJINTPENTJENTPINFJINFPENFJENFPISTJISFJESTJISTPISFPESTPESFP
ESFJ tare da: INTJINTPENTPINFJINFPENFJENFPISTJISFJESTJESFJISTPISFPESTPESFP
Majiyoyi
- Dyrenforth, P. S., Kashy, D. A., Donnellan, M. B., & Lucas, R. E. (2010). Predicting relationship and life satisfaction from personality in nationally representative samples from three countries: The relative importance of actor, partner, and similarity effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(4), 690–702.
- Malouff, J. M., Thorsteinsson, E. B., Schutte, N. S., Bhullar, N., & Rooke, S. E. (2010). The five-factor model of personality and relationship satisfaction of intimate partners: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 44(1), 124–127.
- Jensen-Campbell, L. A., & Graziano, W. G. (2001). Agreeableness as a moderator of interpersonal conflict. Journal of Personality, 69(2), 323–362.
- Schmitt, D. P. (2004). The Big Five related to risky sexual behaviour across 10 world regions: Differential personality associations of sexual promiscuity and relationship infidelity. European Journal of Personality, 18(4), 301–319.
- Selfhout, M., Burk, W., Branje, S., Denissen, J., van Aken, M., & Meeus, W. (2010). Emerging late adolescent friendship networks and Big Five personality traits: A social network approach. Journal of Personality, 78(2), 509–538.
- Harris, K., & Vazire, S. (2016). On friendship development and the Big Five personality traits. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 10(11), 647–667.
- Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44(1), 1–26.
- Karney, B. R., & Bradbury, T. N. (1995). The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: A review of theory, method, and research. Psychological Bulletin, 118(1), 3–34.
- Roberts, B. W., Walton, K. E., & Viechtbauer, W. (2006). Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 132(1), 1–25.
- Roberts, B. W., Luo, J., Briley, D. A., Chow, P. I., Su, R., & Hill, P. L. (2017). A systematic review of personality trait change through intervention. Psychological Bulletin, 143(2), 117–141.
- Hudson, N. W., & Fraley, R. C. (2015). Volitional personality trait change: Can people choose to change their personality traits? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(3), 490–507.
- Judge, T. A., Heller, D., & Mount, M. K. (2002). Five-factor model of personality and job satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 530–541.
- Thielmann, I., Spadaro, G., & Balliet, D. (2020). Personality and prosocial behavior: A theoretical framework and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 146(1), 30–90.
- Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2005). Psychopathy, Machiavellianism, and narcissism in the Five-Factor Model and the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Individual Differences, 38(7), 1571–1582.
- Pletzer, J. L., Bentvelzen, M., Oostrom, J. K., & de Vries, R. E. (2019). A meta-analysis of the relations between personality and workplace deviance: Big Five versus HEXACO. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 112, 369–383.
- Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2007). Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11(2), 150–166.
- McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1989). Reinterpreting the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator from the perspective of the five-factor model of personality. Journal of Personality, 57(1), 17–40.
- Soto, C. J. (2019). How replicable are links between personality traits and consequential life outcomes? The Life Outcomes of Personality Replication Project. Psychological Science, 30(5), 711–727.