Gida › Nau’i da nau’i › INFJ vs INTP
INFJ vs INTP
INFJ ko INTP: yadda za a bambanta su
INFJ da INTP suna tarayya a haruffa biyu (I mai son kaɗaici da N mai hasashe) kuma sun bambanta a Sauƙin kai da Ƙwazo. Don zaɓar tsakaninsu, kuna buƙatar warware duka waɗannan haruffa biyu, kuma kowanne tambaya ce dabam.
Mai zurfin tunani, mai hasashe, mai kulawa, mai shiri.
Kuna haɗa hasashe da tausayi tare da ƙarfin son tsari. Kuna yin shiru a manyan taruka amma kuna shiga sosai idan ku biyu ne kawai, kuma sau da yawa manufofi na dogon lokaci da suka samo asali daga ƙa’idodinku ne suke motsa ku.
Mai shiru, mai bincike, mai shakka, mai sassauci.
Matsaloli da ka’idoji marasa zahiri suna jan hankalinku, kuma kuna jin daɗin tambayar abubuwan da ake ɗauka a matsayin gaskiya. Kun fi son tsari mara tsauri da lokacin yin tunani ku kaɗai, kuma kun fi damuwa da samun abu daidai fiye da faranta wa kowa rai.
Yadda za a zaɓa tsakanin INFJ da INTP
- Ku warware harafi ɗaya a lokaci ɗaya. INFJ da INTP sun bambanta a F/T da J/P, kuma kowanne tambaya ce dabam.
- Ku fara da harafin da kuka fi rashin tabbaci a kansa kuma ku yi amfani da tambayoyin tunaninsa da ke ƙasa.
- Idan kuna gefe ɗaya a fili a wasu haruffa kuma a tsakiya a wasu, wataƙila wani nau’i na uku ya fi dacewa da ku fiye da waɗannan biyu. Ku gwada kwatancen da aka haɗa a ƙasan shafin.
- Gwajin da yake ba da percentile yana nuna waɗanne haruffanku ne bayyanannu da waɗanda suke kan iyaka. Bayyanannu ne suka fi bayyana ku.
Bambanci: F ko T (Sauƙin kai)
Sauƙin kai (Agreeableness) na Big Five: tausayi, karimci, amincewa da wasu da shirin haɗa kai. Yana daidai da harafin F/T (F = sauƙin kai mafi yawa). Alaƙarsa da MBTI matsakaiciya ce.
Kuna da karimci, kulawa da taimako, kuma kuna la’akari da yadda wasu suke ji.
Kuna magana kai tsaye, kuna da shakka kuma kuna son gasa, kuma kuna sa gaskiya da sakamako a gaban jituwa.
Yadda yake bayyana a yau da kullum
Bayanin abin da sifar take, ba sakamakon bincike ba.
- INFJ (F): Wataƙila kuna lura da yadda shawarwari suke shafar mutane kuma kuna daraja yanayin haɗin kai a ƙungiya.
- INTP (T): Wataƙila kuna gabatar da hankali, ma’auni da sakamako, kuma ba ku jin nauyin faɗin gaskiya mai ɗaci.
- INFJ (F): Wataƙila kuna lura da yadda masoyinku yake ji kuma kuna karkata ga sassautawa don kiyaye zaman lafiya.
- INTP (T): Wataƙila kun fi daraja gaskiya fiye da kwantar da hankali, kuma kuna iya nuna kulawa ta hanyar warware matsaloli maimakon nuna tausayi.
Abin da bincike ya danganta da kowane gefe
Matsakaita ne a cikin mutane da yawa. Tasiri irin wannan gaskiya ne amma yawanci ƙarami ne, don haka yana sauya yiwuwa ga rukuni kuma yana faɗin kaɗan game da kowane mutum guda.
Dalilin da ya sa mutane suke rikita F da T
- Ladabi ko gaskiya ba ɗaya suke da F ba. Tsarin HEXACO yana bambanta sauƙin kai (kirki, haƙuri, yafiya) da gaskiya da tawali’u (gaskiya da adalci), don haka mai magana kai tsaye zai iya zama mai cikakken adalci, kuma mai iya ɗaukar hankali zai iya zama mai dabara.[1]
- Ma’aunin gargajiya na T/F yana daidai ne kawai a matsakaici da sauƙin kai na Big Five, wanda shi ne abin da wannan harafi yake auna a nan. Idan wani gwaji ya ba ku nau’i dabam, wannan yana daga cikin haruffan da suka fi yiwuwar saɓawa.[2]
- Idan aboki ya nuna muku aikin da yake da matsaloli a fili, tunaninku na farko shi ne ku kare yadda yake ji (F) ko ku faɗi matsalolin a fili (T)?
- A saɓani, kuna neman abin da kuka yarda a kai (F), ko kuna ci gaba da matsawa har sai hujja mafi ƙarfi ta yi nasara (T)?
- Kuna yawan ɗauka cewa mutane suna da kyakkyawar niyya har sai an nuna akasin haka (F), ko kuna jira sai sun cancanci amincewarku (T)?
- Idan wani ya ɓata rai da ku, yana daɗewa a zuciyarku (F), ko za ku iya ƙyale shi idan kuna ganin ku ne kuke da gaskiya (T)?
Ku amsa bisa abin da kuke yawan yi, ba abin da kuke son yi ba. Idan amsoshinku sun rabu daidai, wataƙila kuna kusa da tsakiya a wannan sifa.
Bambanci: J ko P (Ƙwazo)
Ƙwazo (Conscientiousness) na Big Five: tsari, jajircewa, horon kai da kasancewa abin dogaro. Yana daidai da harafin J/P (J = ƙwazo mafi yawa). Alaƙarsa da MBTI matsakaiciya ce.
Kuna tsarawa, ana iya dogara da ku kuma kuna lura da ƙananan bayanai, kuma kuna son kammala abin da kuka fara.
Kuna yin abu nan take kuma kuna saurin sabawa da yanayi. Kuna son barin hanyoyi a buɗe kuma kuna aiki ta hanyar fashewar kuzari.
Yadda yake bayyana a yau da kullum
Bayanin abin da sifar take, ba sakamakon bincike ba.
- INFJ (J): Wataƙila kuna tsarawa tun da wuri, kuna cika alkawari kuma kun fi son bayyanannun ranakun ƙarshe da nauye-nauye.
- INTP (P): Wataƙila kuna aiki ta hanyar fashewar kuzari, kuna saurin sabawa da sauyi kuma kun fi son abubuwa dabam-dabam fiye da tsayayyun al’adu.
- INFJ (J): Wataƙila kuna son tsare-tsaren tare da hasashen abubuwa, kuma kuna nuna jajircewa ta hanyar cika ƙananan alkawura.
- INTP (P): Wataƙila kuna kawo yin abu nan take da nishaɗi, kuma wataƙila kuna ƙin dangantaka mai cike da jadawali.
Abin da bincike ya danganta da kowane gefe
- Daga cikin sifofin hali, ƙwazo shi ne mai hasashen ƙwazon aiki mafi daidaito a dukkan rukunonin ayyukan da aka bincika.[8]
- A makarantar sakandare da jami’a, yana da alaƙa da makin karatu da ƙarfi kamar basira.[9]
- A matsakaici, mutane masu yawan ƙwazo suna rayuwa tsawon lokaci, wani ɓangare saboda kyawawan halaye na lafiya.[10][11]
- Ƙarancin ƙwazo yana da alaƙa da jinkirta abubuwa da halaye masu haɗari ga lafiya (abinci, motsa jiki, shaye-shaye).[12][11]
- A dukkan ayyuka, ƙarancin ƙwazo a matsakaici yana hasashen ƙarancin ƙwazon aiki.[8]
- A yankuna 10 na duniya, ƙarancin ƙwazo yana da alaƙa da rashin aminci a dangantaka. Bayyanannun yarjejeniyoyi suna taimakawa.[6]
Matsakaita ne a cikin mutane da yawa. Tasiri irin wannan gaskiya ne amma yawanci ƙarami ne, don haka yana sauya yiwuwa ga rukuni kuma yana faɗin kaɗan game da kowane mutum guda.
Dalilin da ya sa mutane suke rikita J da P
- Ƙwazo yakan ƙaru daga farkon girma zuwa tsakiyar shekaru, don haka P na kan iyaka a shekarunku na samartaka ko ashirin zai iya komawa J daga baya.[7]
- Ma’aunin gargajiya na J/P yana daidai ne kawai a matsakaici da ƙwazo na Big Five, wanda shi ne abin da wannan harafi yake auna a nan. Idan wani gwaji ya ba ku nau’i dabam, wannan yana daga cikin haruffan da suka fi yiwuwar saɓawa.[2]
- Shin wurin aikinku, akwatin imel ko kalandarku yawanci suna cikin tsari (J), ko kuna tafiyar da abubuwa lafiya cikin ɗan hargitsi (P)?
- Idan ranar ƙarshe tana da sauran makonni biyu, kuna farawa da wuri kuma ku tafi a hankali (J), ko kuna yin yawancin aikin kusa da ranar ƙarshe (P)?
- A tafiya, kuna son shiri na kowace rana (J), ko kun fi son yanke shawara yayin da kuke tafiya (P)?
- Shin kuna cika ƙananan alkawura (mayar da kira, aika fayil) a kan lokaci ba tare da tunatarwa ba (J), ko sau da yawa suna zamewa (P)?
Ku amsa bisa abin da kuke yawan yi, ba abin da kuke son yi ba. Idan amsoshinku sun rabu daidai, wataƙila kuna kusa da tsakiya a wannan sifa.
Abin da INFJ da INTP suke tarayya a kai
Haruffan da ke ƙasa su ne abin tarayya. Ko wane nau’i ne ku, waɗannan sassan bayanan duka biyu ya kamata su dace da ku.
Kun fi son ƙananan taruka da wurare masu natsuwa, kuma yawanci kuna tunani kafin ku yi magana. Son kaɗaici ba ɗaya yake da jin kunya ko damuwa ba. Waɗannan suna cikin wata sifa dabam (natsuwar zuciya).
Kuna son bincike kuma kuna da hasashe, kuma kuna jin daɗin ra’ayoyi marasa zahiri, ka’idoji da sababbin abubuwa.
Dalilin da ya sa sakamakonku zai iya juyawa tsakanin INFJ da INTP
- Sifofin hali suna ci gaba kuma yawancin mutane suna samun maki kusa da tsakiya. Rarrabuwar maki tana da nauyi a tsakiya, ba a raba ta zuwa sansani biyu ba, har a ma’aunan gargajiya na haruffa huɗu.[2][13]
- Don haka ƙaramin kuskuren awo na yau da kullum ya isa ya juya harafi ga duk wanda yake kusa da layin rabuwa. Rashin daidaiton nau’i idan aka sake gwaji yana daga cikin manyan sukar da aka wallafa game da gwaje-gwajen nau’i masu haruffa huɗu.[14]
- Makin da ke ƙasa yana da daidaito sosai; raba maki mai ci gaba zuwa akwatuna biyu ne yake sa haruffan su zama marasa tabbas.[15]
- Samun INFJ wani lokaci da INTP wani lokaci yana nufin haruffa biyu sun canza tsakanin gwaje-gwaje. Kowane harafi yana juyawa da kansa, don haka wannan yawanci yana nufin wasu daga cikin sifofinku suna kusa da matsakaici, ko kun amsa kuna tunanin yanayi dabam-dabam (aiki ko gida, mako mai kyau ko marar kyau).
- A gwajin 64 Types, ana ba da rahoton kowace sifa a matsayin percentile idan aka kwatanta da amsoshi na gaske. Duk sifar da take cikin maki 10 daga percentile na 50 ana yi mata alamar kan iyaka, kuma ana nuna muku lambar da za ku samu idan aka juya wannan harafi. Bisa ma’ana, kashi 20% na mutane suna tsakanin percentile na 40 da na 60 a kowace sifa.
- Sauyi na gaske ma yana da muhimmanci: a matsakaici mutane suna ƙara ƙwazo tsakanin shekaru 20 zuwa 40, don haka sakamakon J/P zai iya sauyawa a cikin shekaru saboda dalilan da ba su da alaƙa da gwajin.[7]
INFJ da INTP a aiki da soyayya
Bambance-bambancen da ke sama sun fi bayyana a aiki da dangantaka. Don hoton sana’a, ga fannonin sha’awa uku da kowane nau’i yakan fi karkata zuwa gare su, da yadda haruffan da suka bambanta suke karkatar da su:
Karkatar sha’awa da aka saba gani: Na fasaha, Na bincike, Na tsari
Karkatar sha’awa da aka saba gani: Na fasaha, Na bincike, Na zahiri
- F ko T: gefen F (INFJ) yana da alaƙa da ƙarin sha’awar aikin zamantakewa (taimako, koyarwa, kulawa) fiye da gefen T (INTP).[16]
- J ko P: gefen J (INFJ) yana da alaƙa da ƙarin sha’awar aikin tsari (bayanai, matakai, daidaito) fiye da gefen P (INTP).[16]
Waɗannan karkatar sha’awa sun fito ne daga alaƙoƙin nazarce-nazarce tsakanin Big Five da sha’awar sana’a. Alaƙoƙin matsakaita ne, don haka auna sha’awa kai tsaye ya fi hasashensu daga nau’i.[16]
Gwajin 64 Types yana ba ku percentile a kowace sifa, yana yi wa haruffan kan iyaka alama, kuma yana ƙara sifofi biyu da gwaje-gwajen haruffa huɗu suke rasawa. Tambayoyi 62, kusan minti 8, ba rajista.
Ku yi gwajin kyautaTambayoyin da ake yawan yi
Mene ne bambanci tsakanin INFJ da INTP?
Sun bambanta a haruffa biyu: Sauƙin kai (INFJ F, INTP T); Ƙwazo (INFJ J, INTP P). Suna tarayya a I (mai son kaɗaici) da N (mai hasashe). Kowane harafi sifa ce dabam mai ci gaba, don haka bambance-bambancen suna taruwa ne maimakon su samar da irin mutane biyu kafaffu.
Ta yaya zan san ko ni INFJ ne ko INTP?
Ku mai da hankali ne kawai kan haruffan da suka bambanta (F/T da J/P). Ku yi tunani kan abin da kuke yi da gaske a yanayi na yau da kullum, ku tambayi wanda ya san ku sosai, kuma ku yi gwajin da yake ba da percentile na kowace sifa maimakon harafi kawai. Idan sifa ta fito kusa da percentile na 50, kuna kusa da matsakaici a cikinta kuma nau’o’in biyu za su bayyana ku a wani ɓangare.
Me ya sa nake samun INFJ a wani gwaji da INTP a wani?
Sifofin hali suna ci gaba kuma yawancin mutane suna samun maki kusa da tsakiya, don haka ƙananan bambance-bambance a yadda kuke amsawa za su iya juya harafi. Sauyin nau’i idan aka sake gwaji yana daga cikin matsalolin gwaje-gwajen haruffa huɗu da aka fi rubutawa. Tun da INFJ da INTP sun bambanta da haruffa biyu, wataƙila kuna kusa da tsakiya a sifofi da dama, ko kun amsa kuna tunanin yanayi dabam-dabam.
Shin INFJ da INTP sun dace da juna?
Wannan tambaya ce dabam da wanda kuke. A manyan bincike, kamanceceniyar halin masoya biyu ba ta bayyana kusan komai ba bayan sifofin kowannensu; natsuwar zuciya, sauƙin kai da ƙwazo na kowane masoyi sun fi muhimmanci. Shafin dacewar INFJ da INTP yana bayani kan soyayya, abota da aiki ga wannan haɗi.
Binciken dacewa da aka ambata a sama: kamanceceniya ta bayyana kaɗan ne bayan sifofin kowane masoyi[17]; sifofin kowane masoyi sun fi muhimmanci.[18]
Ku zurfafa
Bayanin INFJ · Bayanin INTP · Dacewar INFJ da INTP
Kwatance makamantan wannan
Majiyoyi
- Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2007). Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11(2), 150–166.
- McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1989). Reinterpreting the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator from the perspective of the five-factor model of personality. Journal of Personality, 57(1), 17–40.
- Jensen-Campbell, L. A., & Graziano, W. G. (2001). Agreeableness as a moderator of interpersonal conflict. Journal of Personality, 69(2), 323–362.
- Selfhout, M., Burk, W., Branje, S., Denissen, J., van Aken, M., & Meeus, W. (2010). Emerging late adolescent friendship networks and Big Five personality traits: A social network approach. Journal of Personality, 78(2), 509–538.
- Judge, T. A., Livingston, B. A., & Hurst, C. (2012). Do nice guys—and gals—really finish last? The joint effects of sex and agreeableness on income. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(2), 390–407.
- Schmitt, D. P. (2004). The Big Five related to risky sexual behaviour across 10 world regions: Differential personality associations of sexual promiscuity and relationship infidelity. European Journal of Personality, 18(4), 301–319.
- Roberts, B. W., Walton, K. E., & Viechtbauer, W. (2006). Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 132(1), 1–25.
- Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44(1), 1–26.
- Poropat, A. E. (2009). A meta-analysis of the five-factor model of personality and academic performance. Psychological Bulletin, 135(2), 322–338.
- Kern, M. L., & Friedman, H. S. (2008). Do conscientious individuals live longer? A quantitative review. Health Psychology, 27(5), 505–512.
- Bogg, T., & Roberts, B. W. (2004). Conscientiousness and health-related behaviors: A meta-analysis of the leading behavioral contributors to mortality. Psychological Bulletin, 130(6), 887–919.
- Steel, P. (2007). The nature of procrastination: A meta-analytic and theoretical review of quintessential self-regulatory failure. Psychological Bulletin, 133(1), 65–94.
- Bess, T. L., & Harvey, R. J. (2002). Bimodal score distributions and the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator: Fact or artifact? Journal of Personality Assessment, 78(1), 176–186.
- Pittenger, D. J. (2005). Cautionary comments regarding the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 57(3), 210–221.
- Capraro, R. M., & Capraro, M. M. (2002). Myers-Briggs Type Indicator score reliability across studies: A meta-analytic reliability generalization study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 62(4), 590–602.
- Larson, L. M., Rottinghaus, P. J., & Borgen, F. H. (2002). Meta-analyses of Big Six interests and Big Five personality factors. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61(2), 217–239.
- Dyrenforth, P. S., Kashy, D. A., Donnellan, M. B., & Lucas, R. E. (2010). Predicting relationship and life satisfaction from personality in nationally representative samples from three countries: The relative importance of actor, partner, and similarity effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(4), 690–702.
- Malouff, J. M., Thorsteinsson, E. B., Schutte, N. S., Bhullar, N., & Rooke, S. E. (2010). The five-factor model of personality and relationship satisfaction of intimate partners: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 44(1), 124–127.