Nau’in hali
ENFJ-CM
Mai Ba da Shawara · Natsattse kuma Mai Gaskiya
Mai son jama’a, mai bayyana ra’ayi, mai manufa, mai tsari.
- EMai son jama’aSon jama’a
- NMai hasasheBuɗaɗɗen tunani
- FMai tausayiSauƙin kai
- JMai tsariƘwazo
- CMai natsuwaNatsuwar zuciya
- MMai tawali’uGaskiya da tawali’u
Ku ne wannan? Ku yi gwajin kyauta · kusan minti 8, ba rajista
A taƙaice
Kuna son jama’a, kuna da tausayi, kuna son bincike kuma ana iya dogara da ku, haɗin da ya dace wajen tara mutane a kan wani ra’ayi. Sau da yawa ku ne kuke ɗaukar nauyin kiyaye jituwar ƙungiya da tabbatar da cewa an kammala abubuwa.
Kuna kasancewa cikin natsuwa a ƙarƙashin matsi (natsuwar zuciya mai yawa) kuma kuna da tawali’u da adalci (gaskiya da tawali’u masu yawa). Sau da yawa wasu suna ganin ku a matsayin abin dogaro a lokacin wahala da kuma amintattu da nauyi.
Haruffa shida
Mutane suna ba ku kuzari, kuna magana cikin sauƙi kuma kuna saurin shiga hira.
Kuna son bincike kuma kuna da hasashe, kuma kuna jin daɗin ra’ayoyi marasa zahiri, ka’idoji da sababbin abubuwa.
Kuna da karimci, kulawa da taimako, kuma kuna la’akari da yadda wasu suke ji.
Kuna tsarawa, ana iya dogara da ku kuma kuna lura da ƙananan bayanai, kuma kuna son kammala abin da kuka fara.
Kuna kasancewa cikin natsuwa a ƙarƙashin matsi, kuna saurin farfaɗowa bayan rashin nasara kuma ba kasafai kuke nutsewa cikin damuwa ba.
Kuna da gaskiya da adalci, matsayi da alatu ba sa jan hankalinku, kuma ba ku ganin kun fi wasu.
Yadda sifofinku suke haɗuwa
- Hasashe da horon kai: kuna samun sababbin ra’ayoyi kuma kuna aiwatar da su. Wannan haɗi ya dace da dogayen ayyukan ƙirƙira ko na bincike.[9][1]
Ƙarfi
- Daga cikin sifofin hali, ƙwazo shi ne mai hasashen ƙwazon aiki mafi daidaito a dukkan rukunonin ayyukan da aka bincika.[1]
- A makarantar sakandare da jami’a, yana da alaƙa da makin karatu da ƙarfi kamar basira.[2]
- A matsakaici, mutane masu yawan ƙwazo suna rayuwa tsawon lokaci, wani ɓangare saboda kyawawan halaye na lafiya.[3][4]
- Natsuwar zuciya (ƙarancin saurin damuwa) ita ce alaƙa mafi ƙarfi tsakanin hali da gamsuwa da aiki.[5]
- Ƙarancin saurin damuwa yana da alaƙa da ƙaramin haɗarin cututtukan fargaba da baƙin ciki mai tsanani (depression).[6]
- Natsuwar zuciya tana da kyakkyawar alaƙa da shugabanci.[7]
- Son jama’a ita ce sifar da ta fi daidaito wajen alaƙa da wanda yake fitowa a matsayin shugaba a cikin ƙungiyoyi.[7]
- A matsakaici, masu son jama’a suna ba da rahoton ƙarin jin daɗin rai.[8]
- Kuna saurin gina hanyar sadarwa da mutane, wanda yake taimakawa ga damammakin da suke zuwa ta hanyar shawarwarin mutane.
- Buɗaɗɗen tunani yana da alaƙa mai daidaito da nasarar ƙirƙira, a fasaha da kuma a kimiyya.[9]
- Buɗaɗɗen tunani yana hasashen nasara a horo, wato koyo yayin aiki.[1]
- Mutane masu yawan sauƙin kai suna amfani da hanyoyi masu gina jiki a rikici, kuma ba kasafai suke ƙara rura shi ba.[10]
- Ana yawan zaɓar mutane masu yawan sauƙin kai a matsayin abokai.[11]
- Daga cikin manyan sifofi, gaskiya da tawali’u suna daga cikin masu hasashen halin adalci da haɗin kai mafi ƙarfi a wasannin tattalin arziki.[12]
- Gaskiya da tawali’u su ne masu hasashe mafi ƙarfi a tsarin HEXACO na ƙarancin halaye marasa kyau a wurin aiki (sata, zagon ƙasa, ƙauracewa aiki).[13]
Abubuwan lura
- Saboda yana da wuya a girgiza ku, wataƙila kuna yin watsi da damuwar wasu. Ya fi kyau ku tambaya maimakon ku yi zato.
- Manyan ma’auni za su iya zama taurin kai idan tsare-tsare suka canza. Ku bar sarari a jadawalinku.
- Wataƙila kuna raina nasarorinku ko guje wa tattaunawar ciniki. Kare kanku cikin adalci ba girman kai ba ne.
- Wataƙila ladan matsayi (muƙamai, alawus-alawus) ba sa motsa ku. Ku zaɓi aikin da yake ba da ladan manufa ko farin cikin aikin da aka yi da kyau.
- Sauƙin kai yana da alaƙa ta kishiyar juna da samun kuɗi, kuma tasirin ya fi girma a wajen maza.[14]
- Wataƙila kuna ganin yana da wuya ku ce a’a ko ku tsaya daram a tattaunawar ciniki. Ku shirya abin da kuke so ku nema tun da wuri.
- A wani bincike na fili, manajoji masu son jama’a sun sami sakamako mafi rauni wajen jagorantar ƙungiyoyi masu ƙwazo, saboda ba su buɗe kunne sosai ga ra’ayoyin ’yan ƙungiya ba.[15]
- A wani binciken sayarwa, mutane masu matsakaicin son jama’a (“ambiverts”) sun fi sayarwa fiye da masu tsananin son jama’a, waɗanda wataƙila an ga kamar suna tilastawa.[16]
- Kuna iya rasa sha’awa idan abu ya zama na yau da kullum. Ku tsara matakin kula da ayyuka tun da wuri.
Aiki da sana’a
Hali yana hasashen sha’awa kaɗan ne kawai, don haka ku ɗauki waɗannan a matsayin wurin farawa. Sha’awarku, ƙwarewarku da ƙa’idodinku sun fi nau’i muhimmanci.
Waɗanne sana’o’i ne suka dace da sha’awarku? Gwajin sana’a (da Turanci) →
- Ƙwazo yana da alaƙa da sha’awar ayyukan tsari (bayanai, matakai, daidaito).[17]
- Masu kafa kamfani suna da ƙwazo fiye da manajoji, kuma ƙwazo yana da alaƙa da shugabanci.[18][7]
- Son jama’a yana hasashen ƙwazon aiki musamman a matsayin gudanarwa da sayarwa.[1]
- Son jama’a yana da matsakaiciyar alaƙa da sha’awar kasuwanci da kafa kamfani, kuma alaƙarsa da sha’awar zamantakewa ta fi rauni.[17]
- Buɗaɗɗen tunani yana da alaƙa mafi ƙarfi tsakanin hali da sha’awa: da sha’awar fasaha. Yana da alaƙa kuma da sha’awar bincike.[17]
- Ku nemi aikin da ba za ku daina koyo ba: bincike, zane, dabaru, rubutu ko sababbin fannoni.
- Sauƙin kai yana da alaƙa da sha’awar zamantakewa (koyarwa, taimako, hidima).[17]
- Sauƙin kai yana hasashen ƙwazon aiki gabaɗaya da rauni ne kawai a ayyuka dabam-dabam.[1]
- Ayyuka masu tsananin matsi sun dace da ku: likitancin gaggawa, gudanar da ayyuka, kasuwannin kuɗi, gudanarwa da kafa kasuwanci.
- Kuna iya yin nasara inda gaskiya take da muhimmanci: binciken kuɗi, bin ƙa’idoji, kiwon lafiya, ɗa’ar bincike, aikin gwamnati da sasanci.
Soyayya da dangantaka
- Ƙarancin saurin damuwa a wajen kowanne daga cikin masoyan yana daga cikin abubuwan da suka fi dogaro wajen hasashen gamsuwa da ɗorewar dangantaka.[19][20]
- Yawan sauƙin kai na masoyi yana da alaƙa da ƙarin gamsuwa a dangantaka.[19]
- Ƙwazon masoyi yana da alaƙa da ƙarin gamsuwa a dangantaka.[19]
- Yawan gaskiya da tawali’u yana nufin ƙarancin haɗuwa da sifofin yaudara na “dark triad”, waɗanda suke lalata aminci.[21]
- Son jama’a na masoyi yana da raunanniyar alaƙa da gamsuwa a dangantaka. Bai kai muhimmancin natsuwar zuciya, sauƙin kai ko ƙwazo ba.[19]
- Idan masoyinku ya fi son kaɗaici, ku yarda da wuri kan yawan lokacin zamantakewa da kowannenku yake so. Wannan bambanci ne da aka saba gani kuma ana iya warware shi.
- A nazarce-nazarce, buɗaɗɗen tunani kusan ba shi da alaƙa da gamsuwar masoyi. Son bincike na tare batun ɗanɗano ne, ba mai hasashen dacewa ba.[19]
Abota
- Masu son jama’a suna saurin samun sababbin abokai kuma a ƙarshe suna da faffaɗan da’irar abokai.[11][22]
- Babbar hanyar sadarwa ba ta tabbatar da abota ta kurkusa ba. Ku ware lokaci kuma don haɗuwa ɗaya da ɗaya.
- Sauƙin kai yana taimakawa wajen ginawa da riƙe abota, saboda mutane suna jin aminci idan suna tare da ku.[22]
- Mutane suna amincewa da ku da sirrinsu kuma suna dogara da adalcinku, mabuɗin abota ta kurkusa.
- Ku ne abokin da yake tunawa kuma yake zuwa. Kasancewa abin dogaro shi ne tushen aminci mai natsuwa.
- Sau da yawa abokai suna dogara da ku a lokacin wahala. Ku tabbatar cewa taimako yana tafiya ta ɓangarorin biyu.
- Kuna samun kuzari daga abokan da za ku iya musayar ra’ayoyi, littattafai da sababbin abubuwa da su.
Damuwa da walwala
- Natsuwar zuciya tana daga cikin abubuwan hali mafi ƙarfi wajen hasashen walwala.[23]
- Son jama’a yana daga cikin alaƙoƙi mafi ƙarfi tsakanin hali da jin daɗin rai da gamsuwa da rayuwa.[23]
- Ƙwazo yana da kyakkyawar alaƙa da gamsuwa da rayuwa.[23]
- Sauƙin kai yana da matsakaiciyar alaƙa da walwala.[23]
- Gabaɗaya, gaskiya da tawali’u suna da alaƙa da sakamako masu amfani ga al’umma da na ɗabi’a ta gari a fannoni da yawa na rayuwa.[24]
- Buɗaɗɗen tunani yana da raunanniyar alaƙa ne kawai da gamsuwa da rayuwa gabaɗaya.[23]
Ci gaba
- Ku saba da faɗin yadda kuke ji a fili. Wasu za su iya ɗauka cewa natsuwarku sanyin rai ne.
- Ku tsara da gangan lokacin da babu wani shiri a cikinsa. Sassauci ma ƙwarewa ce.
- Ku ɗauki tsayawa kan matsayinku a matsayin ƙwarewa. Kirki da faɗin abin da kuke buƙata a fili suna tafiya tare sosai.
- Ku saba da yin tambayoyi kafin ku faɗi ra’ayinku. Wannan yana taimakawa musamman a ƙungiyoyi masu ƙwazo.[15]
- Kafin kimanta aiki da tattaunawar ciniki, ku rubuta gudummawarku don kada tawali’unku ya ɓoye ta.
- Ku haɗa ƙirƙirar ra’ayoyi da ranar ƙarshe ko da wanda zai taimaka muku ku kammala.
Yaya ƙarfin waɗannan sakamako yake?
Alaƙar da ke tsakanin sifofi da sakamakon rayuwa da aka ambata a nan gaskiya ce kuma ana iya maimaita ta, amma kowacce ita kaɗai ƙarama ce. Alaƙar da aka saba gani ita ce r ≈ 0.10–0.30, wato sifofi suna sauya yiwuwa ne maimakon su yanke sakamako. Wani babban aikin maimaita bincike ya tabbatar da kusan kashi 87% na alaƙar da aka gwada, yawanci da tasiri ɗan ƙasa da wanda aka ruwaito tun farko.[27] Layukan da ba su da majiya shawarwari ne na aiki, ba sakamakon bincike ba.
Majiyoyi
- Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44(1), 1–26.
- Poropat, A. E. (2009). A meta-analysis of the five-factor model of personality and academic performance. Psychological Bulletin, 135(2), 322–338.
- Kern, M. L., & Friedman, H. S. (2008). Do conscientious individuals live longer? A quantitative review. Health Psychology, 27(5), 505–512.
- Bogg, T., & Roberts, B. W. (2004). Conscientiousness and health-related behaviors: A meta-analysis of the leading behavioral contributors to mortality. Psychological Bulletin, 130(6), 887–919.
- Judge, T. A., Heller, D., & Mount, M. K. (2002). Five-factor model of personality and job satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 530–541.
- Kotov, R., Gamez, W., Schmidt, F., & Watson, D. (2010). Linking "big" personality traits to anxiety, depressive, and substance use disorders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136(5), 768–821.
- Judge, T. A., Bono, J. E., Ilies, R., & Gerhardt, M. W. (2002). Personality and leadership: A qualitative and quantitative review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 765–780.
- Lucas, R. E., & Fujita, F. (2000). Factors influencing the relation between extraversion and pleasant affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 1039–1056.
- Feist, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(4), 290–309.
- Jensen-Campbell, L. A., & Graziano, W. G. (2001). Agreeableness as a moderator of interpersonal conflict. Journal of Personality, 69(2), 323–362.
- Selfhout, M., Burk, W., Branje, S., Denissen, J., van Aken, M., & Meeus, W. (2010). Emerging late adolescent friendship networks and Big Five personality traits: A social network approach. Journal of Personality, 78(2), 509–538.
- Thielmann, I., Spadaro, G., & Balliet, D. (2020). Personality and prosocial behavior: A theoretical framework and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 146(1), 30–90.
- Pletzer, J. L., Bentvelzen, M., Oostrom, J. K., & de Vries, R. E. (2019). A meta-analysis of the relations between personality and workplace deviance: Big Five versus HEXACO. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 112, 369–383.
- Judge, T. A., Livingston, B. A., & Hurst, C. (2012). Do nice guys—and gals—really finish last? The joint effects of sex and agreeableness on income. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(2), 390–407.
- Grant, A. M., Gino, F., & Hofmann, D. A. (2011). Reversing the extraverted leadership advantage: The role of employee proactivity. Academy of Management Journal, 54(3), 528–550.
- Grant, A. M. (2013). Rethinking the extraverted sales ideal: The ambivert advantage. Psychological Science, 24(6), 1024–1030.
- Larson, L. M., Rottinghaus, P. J., & Borgen, F. H. (2002). Meta-analyses of Big Six interests and Big Five personality factors. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61(2), 217–239.
- Zhao, H., & Seibert, S. E. (2006). The Big Five personality dimensions and entrepreneurial status: A meta-analytical review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(2), 259–271.
- Malouff, J. M., Thorsteinsson, E. B., Schutte, N. S., Bhullar, N., & Rooke, S. E. (2010). The five-factor model of personality and relationship satisfaction of intimate partners: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 44(1), 124–127.
- Karney, B. R., & Bradbury, T. N. (1995). The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: A review of theory, method, and research. Psychological Bulletin, 118(1), 3–34.
- Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2005). Psychopathy, Machiavellianism, and narcissism in the Five-Factor Model and the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Individual Differences, 38(7), 1571–1582.
- Harris, K., & Vazire, S. (2016). On friendship development and the Big Five personality traits. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 10(11), 647–667.
- Steel, P., Schmidt, J., & Shultz, J. (2008). Refining the relationship between personality and subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 134(1), 138–161.
- Zettler, I., Thielmann, I., Hilbig, B. E., & Moshagen, M. (2020). The nomological net of the HEXACO model of personality: A large-scale meta-analytic investigation. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(3), 723–760.
- McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1989). Reinterpreting the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator from the perspective of the five-factor model of personality. Journal of Personality, 57(1), 17–40.
- Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2007). Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11(2), 150–166.
- Soto, C. J. (2019). How replicable are links between personality traits and consequential life outcomes? The Life Outcomes of Personality Replication Project. Psychological Science, 30(5), 711–727.