Fara gwajin
Menu
Ku yi gwajin kyauta
Harshe

Gida › Nau’i da nau’i › INFP vs ISTP

INFP vs ISTP

INFP ko ISTP: yadda za a bambanta su

INFP da ISTP suna tarayya a haruffa biyu (I mai son kaɗaici da P mai sassauci) kuma sun bambanta a Buɗaɗɗen tunani da Sauƙin kai. Don zaɓar tsakaninsu, kuna buƙatar warware duka waɗannan haruffa biyu, kuma kowanne tambaya ce dabam.

INFP · Mai Mafarki

Mai taushi, mai hasashe, mai jin abin da wasu suke ji, mara takura.

Kuna da hasashe, kirki kuma kuna karkata ga cikin kanku, tare da wadataccen tunani na ciki. Kun fi son sassauci fiye da tsauraran tsare-tsare, kuma kuna yin aiki mafi kyau idan ya shafi wani abu da kuke kula da shi.

ISTP · Gwanin Hannu

Mai shiru, gwanin aikin hannu, mai cin gashin kai, mai saurin sabawa.

Kuna da shiru, kuna aiki da zahiri, kuna da gaskiya kuma kuna da sassauci. Kuna son fahimtar yadda abubuwa suke aiki ta hanyar yin aiki da su, kuna ƙirƙirar mafita nan take kuma kuna kare ’yancinku.

Yadda za a zaɓa tsakanin INFP da ISTP

  1. Ku warware harafi ɗaya a lokaci ɗaya. INFP da ISTP sun bambanta a N/S da F/T, kuma kowanne tambaya ce dabam.
  2. Ku fara da harafin da kuka fi rashin tabbaci a kansa kuma ku yi amfani da tambayoyin tunaninsa da ke ƙasa.
  3. Idan kuna gefe ɗaya a fili a wasu haruffa kuma a tsakiya a wasu, wataƙila wani nau’i na uku ya fi dacewa da ku fiye da waɗannan biyu. Ku gwada kwatancen da aka haɗa a ƙasan shafin.
  4. Gwajin da yake ba da percentile yana nuna waɗanne haruffanku ne bayyanannu da waɗanda suke kan iyaka. Bayyanannu ne suka fi bayyana ku.

Bambanci: N ko S (Buɗaɗɗen tunani)

Buɗaɗɗen tunani ga sabon abu (Openness to Experience) na Big Five (wanda aka auna a nan a matsayin hikima da hasashe): son bincike, ƙirƙira, sha’awar ra’ayoyi da tunani marar zahiri. Yana daidai da harafin N/S, wanda yake da alaƙa mai ƙarfi da buɗaɗɗen tunani na Big Five.

INFP
N · Mai hasashe

Kuna son bincike kuma kuna da hasashe, kuma kuna jin daɗin ra’ayoyi marasa zahiri, ka’idoji da sababbin abubuwa.

ISTP
S · Mai aiki da zahiri

Kun fi son abubuwa na zahiri, waɗanda aka tabbatar kuma masu amfani, kuma kuna amincewa da gogewa fiye da ka’ida.

Yadda yake bayyana a yau da kullum

Bayanin abin da sifar take, ba sakamakon bincike ba.

Aiki da sana’a
  • INFP (N): Wataƙila ra’ayoyi, tsare-tsare da damammaki suna jan hankalinku, kuma kuna gajiya idan aiki ya zama maimaitawa kawai.
  • ISTP (S): Wataƙila kun fi son ayyuka na zahiri masu sakamakon da ake gani, kuma kuna amincewa da hanyoyin da aka riga aka tabbatar suna aiki.
Soyayya da dangantaka
  • INFP (N): Wataƙila kuna jin daɗin tattauna ra’ayoyi, tsare-tsare da ma’anar rayuwa da masoyi, kuma kuna daraja sababbin abubuwa a abubuwan da kuke yi tare.
  • ISTP (S): Wataƙila kuna nuna soyayya ta hanyar taimako na zahiri da al’adun yau da kullum masu dogaro fiye da manyan nune-nune ko dogayen hirarraki marasa zahiri.

Abin da bincike ya danganta da kowane gefe

N · Mai hasashe (INFP)
  • Buɗaɗɗen tunani yana da alaƙa mai daidaito da nasarar ƙirƙira, a fasaha da kuma a kimiyya.[1]
  • Buɗaɗɗen tunani yana hasashen nasara a horo, wato koyo yayin aiki.[2]
  • Buɗaɗɗen tunani yana da alaƙa mafi ƙarfi tsakanin hali da sha’awa: da sha’awar fasaha. Yana da alaƙa kuma da sha’awar bincike.[3]
S · Mai aiki da zahiri (ISTP)
  • Buɗaɗɗen tunani yana hasashen nasara a horo. A fannonin da suke sauyawa da sauri, ku yi tsammanin ƙarin ƙoƙarin koyo.[2]
  • Ƙarancin buɗaɗɗen tunani yana da alaƙa da ƙarancin sha’awar ayyukan fasaha da na bincike. Sau da yawa matsayi na zahiri, na aikin hannu da masu bin ƙa’idoji sun fi dacewa.[3]
  • A matsakaici, bambance-bambancen buɗaɗɗen tunani tsakanin masoya suna da ƙaramin tasiri a kan gamsuwa.[4][5]

Matsakaita ne a cikin mutane da yawa. Tasiri irin wannan gaskiya ne amma yawanci ƙarami ne, don haka yana sauya yiwuwa ga rukuni kuma yana faɗin kaɗan game da kowane mutum guda.

Dalilin da ya sa mutane suke rikita N da S

  • N ba game da yawan basirarku ba ne. Yana bayyana yadda ra’ayoyi, hasashe da sababbin abubuwa suke jan hankalinku. Mutane masu ƙwarewa sosai da yawa sun fi son abubuwa na zahiri da aka tabbatar.
  • Aiki zai iya rikitar da wannan harafi: wanda yake aikin fasaha zai iya sarrafa abubuwa marasa zahiri duk rana amma kuma ya fi son abubuwa na zahiri da sanannu a lokacin hutunsa. Ku amsa bisa abin da kuke nema lokacin da babu wanda ya tilasta muku.
Tambayoyin tunani don N ko S (tambayoyin da za a yi tunani a kai, ba gwaji ko maki ba)
  • Idan kuka ji sabon ra’ayi, kuna jin daɗin bin abubuwan da zai haifar da “in da a ce” (N), ko kuna fara son sanin ko yana aiki a zahiri (S)?
  • Shin tattaunawa marasa zahiri game da ka’idoji, falsafa ko hasashe tana burge ku saboda kanta (N), ko tana kama da ɓata lokaci daga matsaloli na gaske (S)?
  • Wajen koyon sabon abu, kuna son ƙa’idar da ke ƙasa da farko (N), ko misali na zahiri da za ku iya yin atisaye a kai (S)?
  • Shin sau da yawa kuna nutsewa cikin mafarkin rana, yanayin da kuka ƙaga ko ra’ayoyin abubuwan da ba su wanzu ba tukuna (N), ko hankalinku galibi yana kan abin da ke gabanku (S)?

Ku amsa bisa abin da kuke yawan yi, ba abin da kuke son yi ba. Idan amsoshinku sun rabu daidai, wataƙila kuna kusa da tsakiya a wannan sifa.

Bambanci: F ko T (Sauƙin kai)

Sauƙin kai (Agreeableness) na Big Five: tausayi, karimci, amincewa da wasu da shirin haɗa kai. Yana daidai da harafin F/T (F = sauƙin kai mafi yawa). Alaƙarsa da MBTI matsakaiciya ce.

INFP
F · Mai tausayi

Kuna da karimci, kulawa da taimako, kuma kuna la’akari da yadda wasu suke ji.

ISTP
T · Mai tsauri

Kuna magana kai tsaye, kuna da shakka kuma kuna son gasa, kuma kuna sa gaskiya da sakamako a gaban jituwa.

Yadda yake bayyana a yau da kullum

Bayanin abin da sifar take, ba sakamakon bincike ba.

Aiki da sana’a
  • INFP (F): Wataƙila kuna lura da yadda shawarwari suke shafar mutane kuma kuna daraja yanayin haɗin kai a ƙungiya.
  • ISTP (T): Wataƙila kuna gabatar da hankali, ma’auni da sakamako, kuma ba ku jin nauyin faɗin gaskiya mai ɗaci.
Soyayya da dangantaka
  • INFP (F): Wataƙila kuna lura da yadda masoyinku yake ji kuma kuna karkata ga sassautawa don kiyaye zaman lafiya.
  • ISTP (T): Wataƙila kun fi daraja gaskiya fiye da kwantar da hankali, kuma kuna iya nuna kulawa ta hanyar warware matsaloli maimakon nuna tausayi.

Abin da bincike ya danganta da kowane gefe

F · Mai tausayi (INFP)
  • Mutane masu yawan sauƙin kai suna amfani da hanyoyi masu gina jiki a rikici, kuma ba kasafai suke ƙara rura shi ba.[8]
  • Ana yawan zaɓar mutane masu yawan sauƙin kai a matsayin abokai.[9]
  • Sauƙin kai yana da alaƙa ta kishiyar juna da samun kuɗi, kuma tasirin ya fi girma a wajen maza.[10]
T · Mai tsauri (ISTP)
  • Ƙarancin sauƙin kai yana da alaƙa da samun kuɗi mafi yawa, musamman a wajen maza.[10]
  • Ƙarancin sauƙin kai yana hasashen hanyoyi masu ɓarna a rashin jituwa.[8]
  • A yankuna 10 na duniya, ƙarancin sauƙin kai yana da alaƙa da rashin aminci a dangantaka.[11]

Matsakaita ne a cikin mutane da yawa. Tasiri irin wannan gaskiya ne amma yawanci ƙarami ne, don haka yana sauya yiwuwa ga rukuni kuma yana faɗin kaɗan game da kowane mutum guda.

Dalilin da ya sa mutane suke rikita F da T

  • Ladabi ko gaskiya ba ɗaya suke da F ba. Tsarin HEXACO yana bambanta sauƙin kai (kirki, haƙuri, yafiya) da gaskiya da tawali’u (gaskiya da adalci), don haka mai magana kai tsaye zai iya zama mai cikakken adalci, kuma mai iya ɗaukar hankali zai iya zama mai dabara.[6]
  • Ma’aunin gargajiya na T/F yana daidai ne kawai a matsakaici da sauƙin kai na Big Five, wanda shi ne abin da wannan harafi yake auna a nan. Idan wani gwaji ya ba ku nau’i dabam, wannan yana daga cikin haruffan da suka fi yiwuwar saɓawa.[7]
Tambayoyin tunani don F ko T (tambayoyin da za a yi tunani a kai, ba gwaji ko maki ba)
  • Idan aboki ya nuna muku aikin da yake da matsaloli a fili, tunaninku na farko shi ne ku kare yadda yake ji (F) ko ku faɗi matsalolin a fili (T)?
  • A saɓani, kuna neman abin da kuka yarda a kai (F), ko kuna ci gaba da matsawa har sai hujja mafi ƙarfi ta yi nasara (T)?
  • Kuna yawan ɗauka cewa mutane suna da kyakkyawar niyya har sai an nuna akasin haka (F), ko kuna jira sai sun cancanci amincewarku (T)?
  • Idan wani ya ɓata rai da ku, yana daɗewa a zuciyarku (F), ko za ku iya ƙyale shi idan kuna ganin ku ne kuke da gaskiya (T)?

Ku amsa bisa abin da kuke yawan yi, ba abin da kuke son yi ba. Idan amsoshinku sun rabu daidai, wataƙila kuna kusa da tsakiya a wannan sifa.

Abin da INFP da ISTP suke tarayya a kai

Haruffan da ke ƙasa su ne abin tarayya. Ko wane nau’i ne ku, waɗannan sassan bayanan duka biyu ya kamata su dace da ku.

Son jama’a
I · Mai son kaɗaici

Kun fi son ƙananan taruka da wurare masu natsuwa, kuma yawanci kuna tunani kafin ku yi magana. Son kaɗaici ba ɗaya yake da jin kunya ko damuwa ba. Waɗannan suna cikin wata sifa dabam (natsuwar zuciya).

Ƙwazo
P · Mai sassauci

Kuna yin abu nan take kuma kuna saurin sabawa da yanayi. Kuna son barin hanyoyi a buɗe kuma kuna aiki ta hanyar fashewar kuzari.

Dalilin da ya sa sakamakonku zai iya juyawa tsakanin INFP da ISTP

  • Sifofin hali suna ci gaba kuma yawancin mutane suna samun maki kusa da tsakiya. Rarrabuwar maki tana da nauyi a tsakiya, ba a raba ta zuwa sansani biyu ba, har a ma’aunan gargajiya na haruffa huɗu.[7][12]
  • Don haka ƙaramin kuskuren awo na yau da kullum ya isa ya juya harafi ga duk wanda yake kusa da layin rabuwa. Rashin daidaiton nau’i idan aka sake gwaji yana daga cikin manyan sukar da aka wallafa game da gwaje-gwajen nau’i masu haruffa huɗu.[13]
  • Makin da ke ƙasa yana da daidaito sosai; raba maki mai ci gaba zuwa akwatuna biyu ne yake sa haruffan su zama marasa tabbas.[14]
  • Samun INFP wani lokaci da ISTP wani lokaci yana nufin haruffa biyu sun canza tsakanin gwaje-gwaje. Kowane harafi yana juyawa da kansa, don haka wannan yawanci yana nufin wasu daga cikin sifofinku suna kusa da matsakaici, ko kun amsa kuna tunanin yanayi dabam-dabam (aiki ko gida, mako mai kyau ko marar kyau).
  • A gwajin 64 Types, ana ba da rahoton kowace sifa a matsayin percentile idan aka kwatanta da amsoshi na gaske. Duk sifar da take cikin maki 10 daga percentile na 50 ana yi mata alamar kan iyaka, kuma ana nuna muku lambar da za ku samu idan aka juya wannan harafi. Bisa ma’ana, kashi 20% na mutane suna tsakanin percentile na 40 da na 60 a kowace sifa.

INFP da ISTP a aiki da soyayya

Bambance-bambancen da ke sama sun fi bayyana a aiki da dangantaka. Don hoton sana’a, ga fannonin sha’awa uku da kowane nau’i yakan fi karkata zuwa gare su, da yadda haruffan da suka bambanta suke karkatar da su:

INFP

Karkatar sha’awa da aka saba gani: Na fasaha, Na bincike, Na zahiri

ISTP

Karkatar sha’awa da aka saba gani: Na zahiri, Na tsari, Na bincike

  • N ko S: gefen N (INFP) yana da alaƙa da ƙarin sha’awar aikin fasaha da bincike fiye da gefen S (ISTP).[3]
  • F ko T: gefen F (INFP) yana da alaƙa da ƙarin sha’awar aikin zamantakewa (taimako, koyarwa, kulawa) fiye da gefen T (ISTP).[3]

Waɗannan karkatar sha’awa sun fito ne daga alaƙoƙin nazarce-nazarce tsakanin Big Five da sha’awar sana’a. Alaƙoƙin matsakaita ne, don haka auna sha’awa kai tsaye ya fi hasashensu daga nau’i.[3]

Aiki da sana’a
INFP a wurin aiki · ISTP a wurin aiki
Soyayya da dangantaka
INFP a soyayya · ISTP a soyayya
Abota
INFP a abota · ISTP a abota
Ƙarfi, rauni da ci gaba
INFP: ƙarfi da rauni · ISTP: ƙarfi da rauni
Ku gano wanda kuke: ku yi gwajin kyauta

Gwajin 64 Types yana ba ku percentile a kowace sifa, yana yi wa haruffan kan iyaka alama, kuma yana ƙara sifofi biyu da gwaje-gwajen haruffa huɗu suke rasawa. Tambayoyi 62, kusan minti 8, ba rajista.

Ku yi gwajin kyauta

Tambayoyin da ake yawan yi

Mene ne bambanci tsakanin INFP da ISTP?

Sun bambanta a haruffa biyu: Buɗaɗɗen tunani (INFP N, ISTP S); Sauƙin kai (INFP F, ISTP T). Suna tarayya a I (mai son kaɗaici) da P (mai sassauci). Kowane harafi sifa ce dabam mai ci gaba, don haka bambance-bambancen suna taruwa ne maimakon su samar da irin mutane biyu kafaffu.

Ta yaya zan san ko ni INFP ne ko ISTP?

Ku mai da hankali ne kawai kan haruffan da suka bambanta (N/S da F/T). Ku yi tunani kan abin da kuke yi da gaske a yanayi na yau da kullum, ku tambayi wanda ya san ku sosai, kuma ku yi gwajin da yake ba da percentile na kowace sifa maimakon harafi kawai. Idan sifa ta fito kusa da percentile na 50, kuna kusa da matsakaici a cikinta kuma nau’o’in biyu za su bayyana ku a wani ɓangare.

Me ya sa nake samun INFP a wani gwaji da ISTP a wani?

Sifofin hali suna ci gaba kuma yawancin mutane suna samun maki kusa da tsakiya, don haka ƙananan bambance-bambance a yadda kuke amsawa za su iya juya harafi. Sauyin nau’i idan aka sake gwaji yana daga cikin matsalolin gwaje-gwajen haruffa huɗu da aka fi rubutawa. Tun da INFP da ISTP sun bambanta da haruffa biyu, wataƙila kuna kusa da tsakiya a sifofi da dama, ko kun amsa kuna tunanin yanayi dabam-dabam.

Shin INFP da ISTP sun dace da juna?

Wannan tambaya ce dabam da wanda kuke. A manyan bincike, kamanceceniyar halin masoya biyu ba ta bayyana kusan komai ba bayan sifofin kowannensu; natsuwar zuciya, sauƙin kai da ƙwazo na kowane masoyi sun fi muhimmanci. Shafin dacewar INFP da ISTP yana bayani kan soyayya, abota da aiki ga wannan haɗi.

Binciken dacewa da aka ambata a sama: kamanceceniya ta bayyana kaɗan ne bayan sifofin kowane masoyi[5]; sifofin kowane masoyi sun fi muhimmanci.[4]

Ku zurfafa

Bayanin INFP · Bayanin ISTP · Dacewar INFP da ISTP

Kwatance makamantan wannan

ENFP vs INFP · bambanci a son jama’aINFP vs ISFP · bambanci a buɗaɗɗen tunaniINFP vs INTP · bambanci a sauƙin kaiINFJ vs INFP · bambanci a ƙwazoESTP vs ISTP · bambanci a son jama’aINTP vs ISTP · bambanci a buɗaɗɗen tunaniISFP vs ISTP · bambanci a sauƙin kaiISTJ vs ISTP · bambanci a ƙwazo

Dukkan kwatancen nau’o’i

Majiyoyi

  1. Feist, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(4), 290–309.
  2. Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44(1), 1–26.
  3. Larson, L. M., Rottinghaus, P. J., & Borgen, F. H. (2002). Meta-analyses of Big Six interests and Big Five personality factors. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61(2), 217–239.
  4. Malouff, J. M., Thorsteinsson, E. B., Schutte, N. S., Bhullar, N., & Rooke, S. E. (2010). The five-factor model of personality and relationship satisfaction of intimate partners: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 44(1), 124–127.
  5. Dyrenforth, P. S., Kashy, D. A., Donnellan, M. B., & Lucas, R. E. (2010). Predicting relationship and life satisfaction from personality in nationally representative samples from three countries: The relative importance of actor, partner, and similarity effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(4), 690–702.
  6. Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2007). Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11(2), 150–166.
  7. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1989). Reinterpreting the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator from the perspective of the five-factor model of personality. Journal of Personality, 57(1), 17–40.
  8. Jensen-Campbell, L. A., & Graziano, W. G. (2001). Agreeableness as a moderator of interpersonal conflict. Journal of Personality, 69(2), 323–362.
  9. Selfhout, M., Burk, W., Branje, S., Denissen, J., van Aken, M., & Meeus, W. (2010). Emerging late adolescent friendship networks and Big Five personality traits: A social network approach. Journal of Personality, 78(2), 509–538.
  10. Judge, T. A., Livingston, B. A., & Hurst, C. (2012). Do nice guys—and gals—really finish last? The joint effects of sex and agreeableness on income. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(2), 390–407.
  11. Schmitt, D. P. (2004). The Big Five related to risky sexual behaviour across 10 world regions: Differential personality associations of sexual promiscuity and relationship infidelity. European Journal of Personality, 18(4), 301–319.
  12. Bess, T. L., & Harvey, R. J. (2002). Bimodal score distributions and the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator: Fact or artifact? Journal of Personality Assessment, 78(1), 176–186.
  13. Pittenger, D. J. (2005). Cautionary comments regarding the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 57(3), 210–221.
  14. Capraro, R. M., & Capraro, M. M. (2002). Myers-Briggs Type Indicator score reliability across studies: A meta-analytic reliability generalization study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 62(4), 590–602.