Fara gwajin
Menu
Ku yi gwajin kyauta
Harshe

Gida › Nau’i da nau’i › ENTP vs INFP

ENTP vs INFP

ENTP ko INFP: yadda za a bambanta su

ENTP da INFP suna tarayya a haruffa biyu (N mai hasashe da P mai sassauci) kuma sun bambanta a Son jama’a da Sauƙin kai. Don zaɓar tsakaninsu, kuna buƙatar warware duka waɗannan haruffa biyu, kuma kowanne tambaya ce dabam.

ENTP · Mai Ƙirƙira

Mai kuzari, mai fasaha, mai son muhawara, mai yin abu nan take.

Kuna jin daɗin mutane da ra’ayoyi daidai wa daida, kuma kuna son muhawara, tara ra’ayoyi tare da ƙalubalantar al’ada. Kuna barin hanyoyi da yawa a buɗe, kuna fara abubuwa da yawa kuma sababbin abubuwa sun fi ba ku kuzari fiye da abin da aka saba.

INFP · Mai Mafarki

Mai taushi, mai hasashe, mai jin abin da wasu suke ji, mara takura.

Kuna da hasashe, kirki kuma kuna karkata ga cikin kanku, tare da wadataccen tunani na ciki. Kun fi son sassauci fiye da tsauraran tsare-tsare, kuma kuna yin aiki mafi kyau idan ya shafi wani abu da kuke kula da shi.

Yadda za a zaɓa tsakanin ENTP da INFP

  1. Ku warware harafi ɗaya a lokaci ɗaya. ENTP da INFP sun bambanta a E/I da F/T, kuma kowanne tambaya ce dabam.
  2. Ku fara da harafin da kuka fi rashin tabbaci a kansa kuma ku yi amfani da tambayoyin tunaninsa da ke ƙasa.
  3. Idan kuna gefe ɗaya a fili a wasu haruffa kuma a tsakiya a wasu, wataƙila wani nau’i na uku ya fi dacewa da ku fiye da waɗannan biyu. Ku gwada kwatancen da aka haɗa a ƙasan shafin.
  4. Gwajin da yake ba da percentile yana nuna waɗanne haruffanku ne bayyanannu da waɗanda suke kan iyaka. Bayyanannu ne suka fi bayyana ku.

Bambanci: E ko I (Son jama’a)

Son jama’a (Extraversion) na Big Five: son zama tare da mutane, tsayuwa kan ra’ayi, yawan magana da jin daɗin rai. Yana daidai da harafin gargajiya na E/I, wanda yake da alaƙa mai ƙarfi da son jama’a na Big Five.

ENTP
E · Mai son jama’a

Mutane suna ba ku kuzari, kuna magana cikin sauƙi kuma kuna saurin shiga hira.

INFP
I · Mai son kaɗaici

Kun fi son ƙananan taruka da wurare masu natsuwa, kuma yawanci kuna tunani kafin ku yi magana. Son kaɗaici ba ɗaya yake da jin kunya ko damuwa ba. Waɗannan suna cikin wata sifa dabam (natsuwar zuciya).

Yadda yake bayyana a yau da kullum

Bayanin abin da sifar take, ba sakamakon bincike ba.

Aiki da sana’a
  • ENTP (E): Wataƙila kun fi yin tunani da kyau a fili, a taruka, kiraye-kiraye da gajerun hirarraki. Aikin da yake da yawan mu’amala da abokan aiki, abokan ciniki ko masu sauraro yakan ba ku kuzari maimakon ya gajiyar da ku.
  • INFP (I): Wataƙila kun fi son yin tunani kafin ku yi magana, kuma kuna yin aiki mafi kyau a lokuta na mai da hankali. Ajandar da aka aiko tun da wuri, sadarwa ta rubutu da lokacin shiri sukan nuna mafi kyawunku.
Soyayya da dangantaka
  • ENTP (E): Wataƙila kuna son raba rayuwarku a zamantakewa: gabatar da masoyi ga abokai, fita tare, da tattauna abubuwa yayin da suke faruwa.
  • INFP (I): Wataƙila kuna nuna kulawa ta hanyar mai da hankali da lokaci ku biyu kawai maimakon cikakken jadawalin zamantakewa, kuma wataƙila kuna buƙatar lokacin hutu har daga mutanen da kuke so.

Abin da bincike ya danganta da kowane gefe

E · Mai son jama’a (ENTP)
  • Son jama’a ita ce sifar da ta fi daidaito wajen alaƙa da wanda yake fitowa a matsayin shugaba a cikin ƙungiyoyi.[2]
  • A matsakaici, masu son jama’a suna ba da rahoton ƙarin jin daɗin rai.[3]
  • A wani bincike na fili, manajoji masu son jama’a sun sami sakamako mafi rauni wajen jagorantar ƙungiyoyi masu ƙwazo, saboda ba su buɗe kunne sosai ga ra’ayoyin ’yan ƙungiya ba.[4]
I · Mai son kaɗaici (INFP)
  • Manajoji marasa yawan son jama’a sun sami sakamako mafi kyau fiye da manajoji masu son jama’a lokacin da suke jagorantar ƙungiyoyi masu ƙwazo, saboda sun fi saurare da amfani da ra’ayoyin ’yan ƙungiya.[4]
  • Wataƙila kuna buƙatar ƙoƙari da gangan don gina hanyar sadarwa da mutane da kuma a gan ku. Son jama’a yana da alaƙa da wanda yake fitowa a matsayin shugaba.[2]
  • Ƙarancin son jama’a yana da alaƙa da ƙarancin sha’awar ayyukan kasuwanci da na zamantakewa. Wannan alaƙa matsakaiciya ce kawai, don haka ya fi kyau ku auna sha’awarku kai tsaye.[5]

Matsakaita ne a cikin mutane da yawa. Tasiri irin wannan gaskiya ne amma yawanci ƙarami ne, don haka yana sauya yiwuwa ga rukuni kuma yana faɗin kaɗan game da kowane mutum guda.

Dalilin da ya sa mutane suke rikita E da I

  • Son kaɗaici ba jin kunya ba ne. Fargaba da damuwa a zamantakewa galibi suna cikin wata sifa dabam, natsuwar zuciya (harafi na 5, C ko R), don haka mai son mu’amala da yake jin fargaba a gaban baƙi zai iya zama E, kuma mutum mai natsuwa da amincewa da kansa zai iya zama I.
  • Kowa yana yin mu’amala kamar mai son jama’a wani lokaci. A binciken da ake ɗaukar bayanai a lokuta dabam-dabam na yau da kullum, mutane, har da masu son kaɗaici, sun ba da rahoton yanayi mafi kyau a lokutan da suke mu’amala kamar masu son jama’a. Jin daɗin maraice mai armashi ba ya mai da ku E; harafin yana bayyana yadda kuke a matsakaici.[1]
Tambayoyin tunani don E ko I (tambayoyin da za a yi tunani a kai, ba gwaji ko maki ba)
  • Bayan dogon mako mai wahala, me ya fi dawo muku da kuzari: maraice na fita tare da abokai (E) ko maraice mai natsuwa galibi ku kaɗai (I)?
  • A taro, kuna yawan gano ra’ayinku ta hanyar magana a fili (E), ko kuna fara samar da shi sannan ku yi magana (I)?
  • A wani biki inda mai gidan kawai kuka sani, kuna yawan zagayawa kuna gabatar da kanku (E), ko kuna zama tare da mutum ɗaya ko biyu (I)?
  • Idan wani abu mai kyau ya faru, sha’awarku ta farko ita ce ku gaya wa mutane nan da nan (E) ko ku fara jin daɗinsa ku kaɗai (I)?

Ku amsa bisa abin da kuke yawan yi, ba abin da kuke son yi ba. Idan amsoshinku sun rabu daidai, wataƙila kuna kusa da tsakiya a wannan sifa.

Bambanci: T ko F (Sauƙin kai)

Sauƙin kai (Agreeableness) na Big Five: tausayi, karimci, amincewa da wasu da shirin haɗa kai. Yana daidai da harafin F/T (F = sauƙin kai mafi yawa). Alaƙarsa da MBTI matsakaiciya ce.

ENTP
T · Mai tsauri

Kuna magana kai tsaye, kuna da shakka kuma kuna son gasa, kuma kuna sa gaskiya da sakamako a gaban jituwa.

INFP
F · Mai tausayi

Kuna da karimci, kulawa da taimako, kuma kuna la’akari da yadda wasu suke ji.

Yadda yake bayyana a yau da kullum

Bayanin abin da sifar take, ba sakamakon bincike ba.

Aiki da sana’a
  • ENTP (T): Wataƙila kuna gabatar da hankali, ma’auni da sakamako, kuma ba ku jin nauyin faɗin gaskiya mai ɗaci.
  • INFP (F): Wataƙila kuna lura da yadda shawarwari suke shafar mutane kuma kuna daraja yanayin haɗin kai a ƙungiya.
Soyayya da dangantaka
  • ENTP (T): Wataƙila kun fi daraja gaskiya fiye da kwantar da hankali, kuma kuna iya nuna kulawa ta hanyar warware matsaloli maimakon nuna tausayi.
  • INFP (F): Wataƙila kuna lura da yadda masoyinku yake ji kuma kuna karkata ga sassautawa don kiyaye zaman lafiya.

Abin da bincike ya danganta da kowane gefe

T · Mai tsauri (ENTP)
  • Ƙarancin sauƙin kai yana da alaƙa da samun kuɗi mafi yawa, musamman a wajen maza.[8]
  • Ƙarancin sauƙin kai yana hasashen hanyoyi masu ɓarna a rashin jituwa.[9]
  • A yankuna 10 na duniya, ƙarancin sauƙin kai yana da alaƙa da rashin aminci a dangantaka.[10]
F · Mai tausayi (INFP)
  • Mutane masu yawan sauƙin kai suna amfani da hanyoyi masu gina jiki a rikici, kuma ba kasafai suke ƙara rura shi ba.[9]
  • Ana yawan zaɓar mutane masu yawan sauƙin kai a matsayin abokai.[11]
  • Sauƙin kai yana da alaƙa ta kishiyar juna da samun kuɗi, kuma tasirin ya fi girma a wajen maza.[8]

Matsakaita ne a cikin mutane da yawa. Tasiri irin wannan gaskiya ne amma yawanci ƙarami ne, don haka yana sauya yiwuwa ga rukuni kuma yana faɗin kaɗan game da kowane mutum guda.

Dalilin da ya sa mutane suke rikita T da F

  • Ladabi ko gaskiya ba ɗaya suke da F ba. Tsarin HEXACO yana bambanta sauƙin kai (kirki, haƙuri, yafiya) da gaskiya da tawali’u (gaskiya da adalci), don haka mai magana kai tsaye zai iya zama mai cikakken adalci, kuma mai iya ɗaukar hankali zai iya zama mai dabara.[6]
  • Ma’aunin gargajiya na T/F yana daidai ne kawai a matsakaici da sauƙin kai na Big Five, wanda shi ne abin da wannan harafi yake auna a nan. Idan wani gwaji ya ba ku nau’i dabam, wannan yana daga cikin haruffan da suka fi yiwuwar saɓawa.[7]
Tambayoyin tunani don T ko F (tambayoyin da za a yi tunani a kai, ba gwaji ko maki ba)
  • Idan aboki ya nuna muku aikin da yake da matsaloli a fili, tunaninku na farko shi ne ku kare yadda yake ji (F) ko ku faɗi matsalolin a fili (T)?
  • A saɓani, kuna neman abin da kuka yarda a kai (F), ko kuna ci gaba da matsawa har sai hujja mafi ƙarfi ta yi nasara (T)?
  • Kuna yawan ɗauka cewa mutane suna da kyakkyawar niyya har sai an nuna akasin haka (F), ko kuna jira sai sun cancanci amincewarku (T)?
  • Idan wani ya ɓata rai da ku, yana daɗewa a zuciyarku (F), ko za ku iya ƙyale shi idan kuna ganin ku ne kuke da gaskiya (T)?

Ku amsa bisa abin da kuke yawan yi, ba abin da kuke son yi ba. Idan amsoshinku sun rabu daidai, wataƙila kuna kusa da tsakiya a wannan sifa.

Abin da ENTP da INFP suke tarayya a kai

Haruffan da ke ƙasa su ne abin tarayya. Ko wane nau’i ne ku, waɗannan sassan bayanan duka biyu ya kamata su dace da ku.

Buɗaɗɗen tunani
N · Mai hasashe

Kuna son bincike kuma kuna da hasashe, kuma kuna jin daɗin ra’ayoyi marasa zahiri, ka’idoji da sababbin abubuwa.

Ƙwazo
P · Mai sassauci

Kuna yin abu nan take kuma kuna saurin sabawa da yanayi. Kuna son barin hanyoyi a buɗe kuma kuna aiki ta hanyar fashewar kuzari.

Dalilin da ya sa sakamakonku zai iya juyawa tsakanin ENTP da INFP

  • Sifofin hali suna ci gaba kuma yawancin mutane suna samun maki kusa da tsakiya. Rarrabuwar maki tana da nauyi a tsakiya, ba a raba ta zuwa sansani biyu ba, har a ma’aunan gargajiya na haruffa huɗu.[7][12]
  • Don haka ƙaramin kuskuren awo na yau da kullum ya isa ya juya harafi ga duk wanda yake kusa da layin rabuwa. Rashin daidaiton nau’i idan aka sake gwaji yana daga cikin manyan sukar da aka wallafa game da gwaje-gwajen nau’i masu haruffa huɗu.[13]
  • Makin da ke ƙasa yana da daidaito sosai; raba maki mai ci gaba zuwa akwatuna biyu ne yake sa haruffan su zama marasa tabbas.[14]
  • Samun ENTP wani lokaci da INFP wani lokaci yana nufin haruffa biyu sun canza tsakanin gwaje-gwaje. Kowane harafi yana juyawa da kansa, don haka wannan yawanci yana nufin wasu daga cikin sifofinku suna kusa da matsakaici, ko kun amsa kuna tunanin yanayi dabam-dabam (aiki ko gida, mako mai kyau ko marar kyau).
  • A gwajin 64 Types, ana ba da rahoton kowace sifa a matsayin percentile idan aka kwatanta da amsoshi na gaske. Duk sifar da take cikin maki 10 daga percentile na 50 ana yi mata alamar kan iyaka, kuma ana nuna muku lambar da za ku samu idan aka juya wannan harafi. Bisa ma’ana, kashi 20% na mutane suna tsakanin percentile na 40 da na 60 a kowace sifa.

ENTP da INFP a aiki da soyayya

Bambance-bambancen da ke sama sun fi bayyana a aiki da dangantaka. Don hoton sana’a, ga fannonin sha’awa uku da kowane nau’i yakan fi karkata zuwa gare su, da yadda haruffan da suka bambanta suke karkatar da su:

ENTP

Karkatar sha’awa da aka saba gani: Na fasaha, Na kasuwanci, Na bincike

INFP

Karkatar sha’awa da aka saba gani: Na fasaha, Na bincike, Na zahiri

  • E ko I: gefen E (ENTP) yana da alaƙa da ƙarin sha’awar aikin kasuwanci (jagoranci, rinjayarwa) da zamantakewa (taimako, koyarwa) fiye da gefen I (INFP).[5]
  • T ko F: gefen F (INFP) yana da alaƙa da ƙarin sha’awar aikin zamantakewa (taimako, koyarwa, kulawa) fiye da gefen T (ENTP).[5]

Waɗannan karkatar sha’awa sun fito ne daga alaƙoƙin nazarce-nazarce tsakanin Big Five da sha’awar sana’a. Alaƙoƙin matsakaita ne, don haka auna sha’awa kai tsaye ya fi hasashensu daga nau’i.[5]

Aiki da sana’a
ENTP a wurin aiki · INFP a wurin aiki
Soyayya da dangantaka
ENTP a soyayya · INFP a soyayya
Abota
ENTP a abota · INFP a abota
Ƙarfi, rauni da ci gaba
ENTP: ƙarfi da rauni · INFP: ƙarfi da rauni
Ku gano wanda kuke: ku yi gwajin kyauta

Gwajin 64 Types yana ba ku percentile a kowace sifa, yana yi wa haruffan kan iyaka alama, kuma yana ƙara sifofi biyu da gwaje-gwajen haruffa huɗu suke rasawa. Tambayoyi 62, kusan minti 8, ba rajista.

Ku yi gwajin kyauta

Tambayoyin da ake yawan yi

Mene ne bambanci tsakanin ENTP da INFP?

Sun bambanta a haruffa biyu: Son jama’a (ENTP E, INFP I); Sauƙin kai (ENTP T, INFP F). Suna tarayya a N (mai hasashe) da P (mai sassauci). Kowane harafi sifa ce dabam mai ci gaba, don haka bambance-bambancen suna taruwa ne maimakon su samar da irin mutane biyu kafaffu.

Ta yaya zan san ko ni ENTP ne ko INFP?

Ku mai da hankali ne kawai kan haruffan da suka bambanta (E/I da F/T). Ku yi tunani kan abin da kuke yi da gaske a yanayi na yau da kullum, ku tambayi wanda ya san ku sosai, kuma ku yi gwajin da yake ba da percentile na kowace sifa maimakon harafi kawai. Idan sifa ta fito kusa da percentile na 50, kuna kusa da matsakaici a cikinta kuma nau’o’in biyu za su bayyana ku a wani ɓangare.

Me ya sa nake samun ENTP a wani gwaji da INFP a wani?

Sifofin hali suna ci gaba kuma yawancin mutane suna samun maki kusa da tsakiya, don haka ƙananan bambance-bambance a yadda kuke amsawa za su iya juya harafi. Sauyin nau’i idan aka sake gwaji yana daga cikin matsalolin gwaje-gwajen haruffa huɗu da aka fi rubutawa. Tun da ENTP da INFP sun bambanta da haruffa biyu, wataƙila kuna kusa da tsakiya a sifofi da dama, ko kun amsa kuna tunanin yanayi dabam-dabam.

Shin ENTP da INFP sun dace da juna?

Wannan tambaya ce dabam da wanda kuke. A manyan bincike, kamanceceniyar halin masoya biyu ba ta bayyana kusan komai ba bayan sifofin kowannensu; natsuwar zuciya, sauƙin kai da ƙwazo na kowane masoyi sun fi muhimmanci. Shafin dacewar ENTP da INFP yana bayani kan soyayya, abota da aiki ga wannan haɗi.

Binciken dacewa da aka ambata a sama: kamanceceniya ta bayyana kaɗan ne bayan sifofin kowane masoyi[15]; sifofin kowane masoyi sun fi muhimmanci.[16]

Ku zurfafa

Bayanin ENTP · Bayanin INFP · Dacewar ENTP da INFP

Kwatance makamantan wannan

ENTP vs INTP · bambanci a son jama’aENTP vs ESTP · bambanci a buɗaɗɗen tunaniENFP vs ENTP · bambanci a sauƙin kaiENTJ vs ENTP · bambanci a ƙwazoENFP vs INFP · bambanci a son jama’aINFP vs ISFP · bambanci a buɗaɗɗen tunaniINFP vs INTP · bambanci a sauƙin kaiINFJ vs INFP · bambanci a ƙwazo

Dukkan kwatancen nau’o’i

Majiyoyi

  1. Fleeson, W., Malanos, A. B., & Achille, N. M. (2002). An intraindividual process approach to the relationship between extraversion and positive affect: Is acting extraverted as "good" as being extraverted? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 1409–1422.
  2. Judge, T. A., Bono, J. E., Ilies, R., & Gerhardt, M. W. (2002). Personality and leadership: A qualitative and quantitative review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 765–780.
  3. Lucas, R. E., & Fujita, F. (2000). Factors influencing the relation between extraversion and pleasant affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 1039–1056.
  4. Grant, A. M., Gino, F., & Hofmann, D. A. (2011). Reversing the extraverted leadership advantage: The role of employee proactivity. Academy of Management Journal, 54(3), 528–550.
  5. Larson, L. M., Rottinghaus, P. J., & Borgen, F. H. (2002). Meta-analyses of Big Six interests and Big Five personality factors. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61(2), 217–239.
  6. Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2007). Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11(2), 150–166.
  7. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1989). Reinterpreting the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator from the perspective of the five-factor model of personality. Journal of Personality, 57(1), 17–40.
  8. Judge, T. A., Livingston, B. A., & Hurst, C. (2012). Do nice guys—and gals—really finish last? The joint effects of sex and agreeableness on income. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(2), 390–407.
  9. Jensen-Campbell, L. A., & Graziano, W. G. (2001). Agreeableness as a moderator of interpersonal conflict. Journal of Personality, 69(2), 323–362.
  10. Schmitt, D. P. (2004). The Big Five related to risky sexual behaviour across 10 world regions: Differential personality associations of sexual promiscuity and relationship infidelity. European Journal of Personality, 18(4), 301–319.
  11. Selfhout, M., Burk, W., Branje, S., Denissen, J., van Aken, M., & Meeus, W. (2010). Emerging late adolescent friendship networks and Big Five personality traits: A social network approach. Journal of Personality, 78(2), 509–538.
  12. Bess, T. L., & Harvey, R. J. (2002). Bimodal score distributions and the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator: Fact or artifact? Journal of Personality Assessment, 78(1), 176–186.
  13. Pittenger, D. J. (2005). Cautionary comments regarding the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 57(3), 210–221.
  14. Capraro, R. M., & Capraro, M. M. (2002). Myers-Briggs Type Indicator score reliability across studies: A meta-analytic reliability generalization study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 62(4), 590–602.
  15. Dyrenforth, P. S., Kashy, D. A., Donnellan, M. B., & Lucas, R. E. (2010). Predicting relationship and life satisfaction from personality in nationally representative samples from three countries: The relative importance of actor, partner, and similarity effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(4), 690–702.
  16. Malouff, J. M., Thorsteinsson, E. B., Schutte, N. S., Bhullar, N., & Rooke, S. E. (2010). The five-factor model of personality and relationship satisfaction of intimate partners: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 44(1), 124–127.