Fara gwajin
Menu
Ku yi gwajin kyauta
Harshe

Yadda gwajin 64 Types yake aiki: kalamai, lissafin maki, ma’aunai da alamomin kan iyaka

Ƙungiyar 64 Types · an sabunta 28 Oktoba, 2026 · karatun minti 7 · majiyoyi 15 da aka wallafa

Gwajin 64 Types yana auna sifofin hali shida da tambayoyin bincike 62 na jama’a, yana mayar da makin kowace sifa zuwa percentile idan aka kwatanta da kusan amsoshi na gaske 20,000, kuma yana ba da harafi ga kowace sifa bisa ko kuna sama ko ƙasa da tsakiya. Haruffa huɗu suna daidai da sanannun ma’aunan E/I, N/S, F/T da J/P, waɗanda aka auna a matsayin sifofin Big Five.[1][2] Ƙarin haruffa biyu suna ƙara sifofin da nau’i mai haruffa huɗu yake barinsu: natsuwar zuciya (C/R) da gaskiya da tawali’u (M/A).[3] Duk sifar da take cikin maki 10 na percentile daga tsakiya ana yi mata alamar kan iyaka, kuma muna nuna lambar da za ku iya samu maimakon haka.

Wannan shafi yana bayyana kowane mataki, don ku iya yi wa sakamakon hukunci da kanku.

Haruffa shida

Lambar 64 Types tana kama da INTJ-CM: sanannun haruffa huɗu, alamar raba kalma, sannan sababbi biyu. Kowane matsayi sifa ɗaya ce.

MatsayiSifaGefen samaGefen ƙasa
1Son jama’aE · Mai son jama’aI · Mai son kaɗaici
2Buɗaɗɗen tunani / hikimaN · Mai hasasheS · Mai aiki da zahiri
3Sauƙin kaiF · Mai tausayiT · Mai tsauri
4ƘwazoJ · Mai tsariP · Mai sassauci
5Natsuwar zuciyaC · Mai natsuwaR · Mai saurin ji
6Gaskiya da tawali’uM · Mai tawali’uA · Mai buri

Yadda matsayi huɗu na farko suka yi daidai ya bi binciken da ya nuna cewa ma’aunan E/I, S/N, T/F da J/P na MBTI suna da alaƙa da son jama’a, buɗaɗɗen tunani, sauƙin kai da ƙwazo na Big Five bi da bi.[2] Natsuwar zuciya ita ce sifar Big Five da babu ma’aunin MBTI da yake kama ta,[2] gaskiya da tawali’u kuma su ne ɓangare na shida na tsarin HEXACO.[4] Haruffa shida masu gefe biyu suna ba da nau’o’i 2⁶ = 64. Duba MBTI da Big Five da gaskiya da tawali’u.

Inda tambayoyi 62 suka fito

Dukkan kalaman sun fito ne daga International Personality Item Pool (IPIP), tarin kalamai na jama’a da kowa zai iya amfani da su don kowace manufa, har da ta kasuwanci:

  • Kalamai 50 su ne alamomin ɓangarorin Big Five na IPIP da Lewis Goldberg ya samar, 10 ga kowace sifa, don son jama’a, buɗaɗɗen tunani, sauƙin kai, ƙwazo da natsuwar zuciya.[1]
  • Kalamai 12 sun fito ne daga ma’aunan gaskiya da tawali’u na IPIP-HEXACO, uku ga kowane ɓangare: gaskiya, adalci, guje wa kwaɗayi da tawali’u.[3] Mun zaɓi kalamai uku ga kowane ɓangare masu mafi girman alaƙa da jimillar ma’aunin (bayan gyara) a buɗaɗɗun bayanai na amsoshi 22,782.

Kuna kimanta kowace magana, kamar “Kullum ina cikin shiri” ko “Ina damuwa da abubuwa”, bisa yadda take kwatanta ku daidai, daga 1 (ba daidai ba ko kaɗan) zuwa 5 (daidai ne sosai). Rabin kalaman (31 cikin 62) masu jujjuyawar gefe ne: kimanta “Ina barin kayana barkatai” a matsayin daidai yana rage makinku na ƙwazo. Haɗa gefe dabam-dabam yana rage tasirin kawai kimanta kowace magana a matsayin daidai.

Mataki bayan mataki: daga amsoshi zuwa percentile

  1. Juya gefe. Ga kalamai masu jujjuyawar gefe, amsar 5 tana zama 1, 4 tana zama 2, da sauransu.
  2. Matsakaici. Makinku na asali a kowace sifa shi ne matsakaicin kalamanta, daga 1 zuwa 5.
  3. Kwatanta da mutane na gaske. Ana nemo makin asali a cikin rarrabuwar rukunin kwatanci. Muna adana percentile na kowace sifa daga 0 zuwa 100 kuma muna cike tsakaninsu, don haka sakamakonku shi ne kason rukunin kwatanci da suka sami maki ƙasa da ku.
  4. Ba da harafi. A percentile na 50 ko sama da haka kuna samun harafin gefen sama (misali E); ƙasa da shi kuna samun harafin gefen ƙasa (I).
  5. Yi wa kan iyaka alama. Idan percentile ɗinku yana cikin maki 10 daga 50 (tsakanin na 40 da na 60), ana yi wa sifar alamar kan iyaka kuma muna nuna madadin lambar da aka juya wannan harafi.

Ana lissafa maki gabaɗaya a cikin burauzarku. Ba a aika amsoshinku zuwa sabar ba (duba shafinmu na sirri).

Me ya sa percentile, ba makin asali ba

Makin asali suna ruɗarwa saboda mutane ba sa amfani da ma’aunin daidai wa daida a dukkan sifofi. A bayanan kwatancinmu matsakaicin makin sauƙin kai shi ne 3.85 cikin 5, yayin da matsakaicin makin son jama’a shi ne 3.01. Saboda haka, makin asali ɗaya yana nufin abubuwa masu bambanci sosai:

Makin asali ɗaya na 3.8 a sifofi biyu (bayanan kwatanci na 64 Types)
SifaMakin asaliPercentile na kusa-kusaHarafi
Son jama’a3.8kusan na 78E (a fili)
Sauƙin kai3.8kusan na 42T (kan iyaka)

Ba tare da ma’aunai ba, 3.8 zai yi kama da “mai yawa” a duka biyu. Tare da ma’aunai, a fili mai son jama’a ne amma ɗan ƙasa da matsakaici a sauƙin kai.

Rukunonin kwatanci da iyakokinsu

Percentile na Big Five sun fito ne daga buɗaɗɗun bayanan Open Psychometrics na masu sa kai na intanet 19,718 da suka cike kalaman IPIP 50 iri ɗaya. Percentile na gaskiya da tawali’u sun fito ne daga buɗaɗɗun bayanan IPIP-HEXACO na amsoshi 22,782, waɗanda aka tattara a ma’auni mai maki 7 kuma aka mayar da su a layi zuwa ma’auninmu mai maki 5. An tattara duka biyu kusan 2012.

Ƙididdigar ma’aunai (ma’auni 1–5)
SifaKalamaiN na kwatanciAmincin awo (α)MatsakaiciSD
Son jama’a1019,7180.893.010.92
Buɗaɗɗen tunani / hikima1019,7180.793.910.63
Sauƙin kai1019,7180.833.850.72
Ƙwazo1019,7180.813.350.73
Natsuwar zuciya1019,7180.872.900.86
Gaskiya da tawali’u1222,7820.823.390.70

Amincin awo (Cronbach’s α) yana tsakanin 0.79 da 0.89, wanda yake da kyau ga gajerun ma’aunan bincike. Babban iyaka shi ne samfurin: masu sa kai na intanet waɗanda suka fi zama matasa (tsakiyar shekaru kusan 22) da masu jin Turanci. Percentile ɗinku yana nufin “idan aka kwatanta da mutanen da suke yin gwaje-gwajen hali na intanet”, ba “idan aka kwatanta da kowa a duniya” ba. Muna shirin sake samar da ma’aunai da masu amfani da mu kuma mu wallafa sakamakon.

Alamomin kan iyaka: ɓangaren gaskiya na sakamakon

Makin sifofin hali suna da nauyi a tsakiya: yawancin mutane suna kusa da tsakiya, kuma rarrabuwar ba a raba ta zuwa sansani biyu ba.[5][2] Duk wanda yake kusa da tsakiya zai iya samun harafi dabam a wata rana saboda kawai kuskuren awo na yau da kullum. Wannan shi ne babban dalilin da ya sa nau’o’i masu haruffa huɗu suke “canzawa” idan aka sake gwaji.[6]

Maimakon mu ɓoye hakan, muna nuna shi. Idan ƙwazonku yana percentile na 55, za ku ga lambarku, alamar kan iyaka a kan J, da lambar da za ku samu da P maimakon haka. Ku karanta percentile, ba harafi kawai ba. Bisa ma’ana kashi 20% na mutane suna a yankin 40–60 a kowace sifa, don haka abu ne na yau da kullum a sami harafi ɗaya ko biyu na kan iyaka.

Shawarar aiki

Idan kuna da harafi na kan iyaka, ku karanta shafukan nau’o’in biyu. Misali, ENFJ-CM na kan iyaka ya kamata kuma ya karanta ENFP-CM. Sifofin da kuke sama ko ƙasa a fili su ne suka fi bayyana ku.

Inda abubuwan cikin bayanan hali suka fito

Sunaye 16 na asali (kamar Mai Dabara ga INTJ) da rassa huɗu (Natsattse kuma Mai Gaskiya, Natsattse kuma Mai Fafutuka, Mai Saurin Ji kuma Mai Gaskiya, Mai Saurin Ji kuma Mai Fafutuka) bayanai ne namu. Duk abin da muke faɗi game da sana’a, dangantaka, abota da walwala an gina shi ne daga binciken matakin sifofi kuma an ambaci majiyarsa a kowane shafin nau’i, tare da layukan da ba su da majiya da aka gabatar a fili a matsayin shawarwarin aiki. Shawarwarin sana’a suna amfani da alaƙoƙin nazarce-nazarce tsakanin hali da sha’awar sana’a.[7]

Ba ma amfani da “cognitive functions”, saboda ba su da goyon bayan bincike.[2] Kuma ba ma samar da kashi na dacewa, saboda kamanceceniyar hali tana bayyana ƙalilan ne kawai na gamsuwa a dangantaka.[8] Kayan aikinmu na kwatantawa yana nuna bambance-bambance maimakon haka.

Rahoto Mai Zurfi na zaɓi: ɓangarori 29

Kowace sifar Big Five ta ƙunshi ƙananan ɓangarori, kuma mutane biyu masu lamba ɗaya za su iya bambanta a ƙasa. Gwaji mai zurfi na zaɓi yana amfani da kalamai 116 daga IPIP-NEO-120 na jama’a, wanda yake auna ɓangarori 30 da kalamai huɗu kowanne.[9] Mun cire ɓangaren Liberalism saboda kalamansa suna tambaya game da zaɓar ’yan takara masu sassaucin ra’ayi ko masu ra’ayin mazan jiya. Percentile sun fito ne daga buɗaɗɗun bayanan Johnson na cikakkun amsoshi 410,376, inda amincin awon ɓangarori yake tsakanin kusan 0.66 da 0.88, ƙasa da na manyan sifofi saboda kowane ɓangare yana da kalamai huɗu kawai.

Rahoto Mai Zurfi yana kan $14.99 a shafin yanar gizo; ana nuna ɓangarorinku biyar da suka fi fice kyauta. Yana da amfani idan kuna son fahimtar dalilin da ya sa kuka sami wani harafi, misali ko ƙarancin natsuwar zuciya ya fito ne daga damuwa, fushi ko ƙuncin rai.

Abin da gwajin ba shi ba

  • Ma’aunin rahoton kai ne na yadda kuke ganin kanku. Mutanen da suka san ku sosai za su iya ƙara bayani, musamman game da sifofin kimantawa kamar hikima.[10][11]
  • Ba kayan aikin asibiti ko na gano cuta ba ne kuma ba kayan aikin ɗaukar ma’aikata ba ne. Alaƙoƙin sifofi da sakamako gaskiya ne amma matsakaita ne.[12][13]
  • Ba alama ce kafaffiya ba. Sifofi suna sauyawa a tsawon rayuwa da kuma da ƙoƙari na da gangan.[14][15]

Tambayoyin da ake yawan yi

Yaya tsawon gwajin 64 Types?

Kusan minti 8 don tambayoyi 62. Ba a buƙatar rajista, kuma ana lissafa maki a cikin burauzarku.

Shin gwajin 64 Types kyauta ne?

Ee. Babban gwajin da cikakken sakamakonku na sifofi shida kyauta ne. Rahoto Mai Zurfi na zaɓi mai ɓangarori 29 yana kan $14.99, kuma ana nuna ɓangarorinku biyar da suka fi fice kyauta.

Me “kan iyaka” yake nufi a sakamakona?

Percentile ɗinku a wannan sifa yana tsakanin 40 da 60, don haka kuna kusa da matsakaici kuma za ku iya samun ɗayan harafin idan kuka sake gwaji. Maki suna taruwa kusa da tsakiya, shi ya sa wannan abu ne na yau da kullum.[5]

Shin 64 Types yana da alaƙa da Myers-Briggs Company ko 16Personalities?

A’a. 64 Types yana amfani da kalaman IPIP na jama’a da nasa bayanai. Ba shi da alaƙa da Myers-Briggs Company, 16Personalities ko marubutan HEXACO-PI-R.

Majiyoyi

  1. Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4(1), 26–42.
  2. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1989). Reinterpreting the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator from the perspective of the five-factor model of personality. Journal of Personality, 57(1), 17–40.
  3. Ashton, M. C., Lee, K., & Goldberg, L. R. (2007). The IPIP–HEXACO scales: An alternative, public-domain measure of the personality constructs in the HEXACO model. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(8), 1515–1526.
  4. Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2007). Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11(2), 150–166.
  5. Bess, T. L., & Harvey, R. J. (2002). Bimodal score distributions and the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator: Fact or artifact? Journal of Personality Assessment, 78(1), 176–186.
  6. Pittenger, D. J. (2005). Cautionary comments regarding the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 57(3), 210–221.
  7. Larson, L. M., Rottinghaus, P. J., & Borgen, F. H. (2002). Meta-analyses of Big Six interests and Big Five personality factors. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61(2), 217–239.
  8. Dyrenforth, P. S., Kashy, D. A., Donnellan, M. B., & Lucas, R. E. (2010). Predicting relationship and life satisfaction from personality in nationally representative samples from three countries: The relative importance of actor, partner, and similarity effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(4), 690–702.
  9. Johnson, J. A. (2014). Measuring thirty facets of the Five Factor Model with a 120-item public domain inventory: Development of the IPIP-NEO-120. Journal of Research in Personality, 51, 78–89.
  10. Vazire, S. (2010). Who knows what about a person? The self–other knowledge asymmetry (SOKA) model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(2), 281–300.
  11. Connelly, B. S., & Ones, D. S. (2010). An other perspective on personality: Meta-analytic integration of observers’ accuracy and predictive validity. Psychological Bulletin, 136(6), 1092–1122.
  12. Soto, C. J. (2019). How replicable are links between personality traits and consequential life outcomes? The Life Outcomes of Personality Replication Project. Psychological Science, 30(5), 711–727.
  13. Ozer, D. J., & Benet-Martínez, V. (2006). Personality and the prediction of consequential outcomes. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 401–421.
  14. Roberts, B. W., Walton, K. E., & Viechtbauer, W. (2006). Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 132(1), 1–25.
  15. Roberts, B. W., Luo, J., Briley, D. A., Chow, P. I., Su, R., & Hill, P. L. (2017). A systematic review of personality trait change through intervention. Psychological Bulletin, 143(2), 117–141.

Yadda muke rubuta jagorori: kowace magana ta bincike tana ambaton majiyar da aka wallafa, ana ba da girman tasiri kamar yadda aka wallafa shi, kuma shawarar da ta wuce shaida ana kiranta shawarar aiki. Ku duba hanyoyin aikinmu. Kun ga kuskure? Ku aiko mana da imel a [email protected].

Jagororin da suka shafi wannan

Shin gwaje-gwajen hali suna da daidaito? Amincin awo, sake gwaji da tasirin Barnum

Yadda ake yi wa gwajin hali hukunci: amincin awo, daidaito idan aka sake gwaji, yarjejeniya da abokai, hasashen rayuwa ta gaske, da dalilin da ya sa sakamako marasa takamaimai suke jin daidai.

MBTI da Big Five: yadda nau’o’i 16 suka yi daidai da tsarin kimiyya

Yadda kowane harafin MBTI ya yi daidai da wata sifa ta Big Five (McCrae da Costa, 1989), abin da Big Five yake ƙarawa, da wane gwaji za a yi amfani da shi don me. Tare da majiyoyi.

Mene ne tsarin HEXACO? Gaskiya da tawali’u, ɓangare na shida na hali

HEXACO yana ƙara sifa ta shida, gaskiya da tawali’u, a kan Big Five. Abin da take auna, yadda ta bambanta da sauƙin kai, da abin da bincike ya nuna take hasashe.