Fara gwajin

Shin MBTI yana da ingancin kimiyya? Abin da bincike ya ce da gaske

Ƙungiyar 64 Types · an sabunta 28 Oktoba, 2026 · karatun minti 8 · majiyoyi 15 da aka wallafa

Wani ɓangare. Ma’aunai huɗu da ke bayan Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) suna auna bambance-bambance na gaske tsakanin mutane, waɗanda ake iya aunawa: a binciken masu zaman kansu suna daidai sosai da huɗu daga cikin sifofin hali na Big Five kuma suna ba da maki masu daidaito gwargwado.[1][2] Abin da shaida ba ta goyon baya ita ce babbar akidar cewa mutane sun kasu zuwa nau’o’i 16 dabam-dabam. Maki suna ci gaba kuma suna taruwa a tsakiya, don haka mutane da yawa suna kusa da layin rabuwa kuma za su iya samun nau’i dabam idan suka sake gwaji.[3][4] MBTI kuma yana barin ɗaya daga cikin sifofin da aka fi bincike a ilimin halayya, wato natsuwar zuciya.[1]

Wannan jagora yana raba abin da ya tsaya daram da wanda bai tsaya ba, yana bayyana dalilin da ya sa gwajin yake jin daidai sosai duk da haka, kuma yana nuna yadda za a yi amfani da harshen nau’i ba tare da an ruɗe ku ba.

Abin da MBTI yake da’awar aunawa

Katharine Briggs da Isabel Briggs Myers ne suka samar da MBTI daga ka’idar Carl Jung ta nau’o’in halayya. Yana rarraba mutane a kan zaɓuɓɓuka huɗu masu gefe biyu: Extraversion ko Introversion (E/I), Sensing ko Intuition (S/N), Thinking ko Feeling (T/F), da Judging ko Perceiving (J/P). Haɗa harafi ɗaya daga kowane biyu yana ba da nau’o’i 16 masu haruffa huɗu, kamar INTJ ko ESFP.

Da’awa biyu masu bambanci sosai sun haɗu a nan, kuma yana taimakawa a yi wa kowacce hukunci dabam:

  • Da’awar awo: ma’aunai huɗu suna kama bambance-bambance masu ɗorewa da ma’ana tsakanin mutane.
  • Da’awar rarrabuwa: mutane sun kasu zuwa iri 16 masu bambanci na asali, kowanne da nasa ƙayyadadden tsarin “functions” na tunani, kuma nau’inku wani abu ne da ku kuke, ba tarin maki da kuke da su ba.

Hukuncin bincike kan waɗannan da’awoyi biyu ya bambanta sosai.

Abin da ya tsaya daram: ma’aunai huɗu suna auna sifofi na gaske

Gwajin MBTI mai zaman kansa da ya fi tasiri shi ne binciken 1989 na Robert McCrae da Paul Costa, biyu daga cikin manyan masu gina tsarin Big Five. Sun ba manya 468 duka MBTI da NEO Personality Inventory, ta hanyar rahoton kai da kimantawar makusanta. Kowane ma’aunin MBTI ya yi daidai da wata sifa dabam ta Big Five: E/I da son jama’a, S/N da buɗaɗɗen tunani, T/F da sauƙin kai, J/P kuma da ƙwazo. Alaƙoƙi biyu na farko suna da ƙarfi, biyu na ƙarshe kuma matsakaita. Marubutan sun kammala cewa MBTI “ya auna wasu fuskoki na huɗu daga cikin manyan ma’aunai biyar na hali na yau da kullum”.[1] Wani bincike a Birtaniya ya gano irin wannan yanayi gabaɗaya.[5]

Daidaiton maki ma abin girmamawa ne. Wani nazari na nazarce-nazarce kan ƙiyasin amincin awo da aka ruwaito a binciken MBTI da aka wallafa ya gano cewa ma’aunan gabaɗaya suna ba da maki masu ƙarfin daidaito na ciki da amincin sake gwaji, ko da yake ƙimomin sun bambanta daga wani bincike zuwa wani.[2]

Don haka haruffan ba na kan-mai-uwa-da-wabi ba ne. Idan makinku ya karkata sarai zuwa Introversion, a matsakaici da gaske kun fi shiru da ƙarancin tsayuwa a zamantakewa fiye da yawancin mutane, kuma ana iya auna wannan bambanci da wasu kayan aiki, kuma waɗanda suka san ku suna ganinsa.

Shawarar aiki

Ku ɗauki kowane harafin MBTI a matsayin karatu mai faɗi na wata sifa ta Big Five. Wannan fassara guda ɗaya tana buɗe shekaru da dama na bincike kan abin da sifofin suke hasashe da gaske. Jagorarmu ta MBTI da Big Five tana bayyana yadda suka yi daidai.

Abin da bai tsaya ba: nau’o’i 16 dabam-dabam

Idan da gaske mutane sun kasu gida biyu a kowane ma’auni, da maki sun taru a tuddai biyu, da ’yan mutane kaɗan a tsakiya. Ba abin da bayanai suka nuna ke nan ba. McCrae da Costa sun gano “babu goyon baya ga ra’ayin cewa MBTI yana auna zaɓuɓɓuka masu gefe biyu na gaske ko nau’o’i masu bambanci na asali”; maimakon haka, kayan aikin yana auna ma’aunai huɗu masu ci gaba waɗanda kusan ba su dogara da juna ba.[1]

Rahotannin baya na rarrabuwar makin MBTI mai tuddai biyu (bimodal) daga baya an gano cewa sun samo asali ne daga wani kuskuren fasaha. Lokacin da Bess da Harvey suka sake ba wa kusan mutane 12,000 maki da item response theory na zamani da isasshen daidaiton lissafi, tuddai biyun sun ɓace kuma rarrabuwar ta zama “mai nauyi sosai a tsakiya”: yawancin mutane sun sami maki kusa da tsakiya.[3]

Wannan yana da muhimmanci saboda layin rabuwa da aka sa a tsakiyar rarrabuwa mai nauyi a tsakiya yana raba wurin da ya fi cunkoso. Mutane biyu da suka bambanta da amsa ɗaya kawai za su iya samun haruffa masu kishiyantar juna, yayin da mutane biyu a ƙarshen gefe ɗaya suke tarayya a harafi ɗaya.

Harafi ɗaya, mutane masu bambanci sosai (percentile na misali a son jama’a)
MutumPercentile na son jama’aAlamar haruffa huɗuGaskiyar al’amari
Ana 49IKusan daidai matsakaici
Bna 51EKusan daidai matsakaici
Cna 97EYa fi A ko B son jama’a nesa ba kusa ba

A nan A da B kusan iri ɗaya ne, duk da haka ɗaya “mai son kaɗaici” ne ɗayan kuma “mai son jama’a”, yayin da B da C suke tarayya a harafi duk da nisan da ke tsakaninsu. Maki masu ci gaba suna kauce wa wannan matsala.

Dalilin da ya sa mutane da yawa suke samun nau’i dabam idan suka sake gwaji

Abin da aka saba fuskanta shi ne yin gwajin sau biyu a sami lamba dabam ta haruffa huɗu. Nazarce-nazarcen MBTI sun nuna wannan rashin daidaiton rarrabuwa a matsayin babban dalilin yin taka-tsantsan wajen fassara tsarin nau’i.[4]

Rashin daidaito yana zuwa kai tsaye daga rarrabuwa mai nauyi a tsakiya. Kowane makin gwaji yana ɗauke da ɗan kuskuren awo. Ga wanda yake kusa da layin rabuwa, wannan ƙaramin kuskure ya isa ya juya harafi. Kuma saboda nau’in yana buƙatar dukkan haruffa huɗu su yi daidai, yiwuwar aƙalla harafi ɗaya ya juya ta fi yiwuwar kowane ma’auni guda girma sosai. Ma’aunai masu amincin awo za su iya samar da nau’o’i marasa daidaito.

Sauyi na gaske ma yana taka rawa. A matsakaici, mutane suna ƙara ƙwazo, natsuwar zuciya da rinjaye a zamantakewa tsakanin shekaru 20 zuwa 40,[6] don haka harafin J/P da yake kan iyaka a shekara 19 zai iya daidaita a shekara 35. Duba Shin nau’in halinku zai iya canzawa? don shaida.

Abin da MBTI yake bari

A bayanan McCrae da Costa, sifa ta biyar ta Big Five, saurin damuwa (Neuroticism; kishiyarta ita ce natsuwar zuciya), babu ɗaya daga cikin ma’aunai huɗu na MBTI da ya kama ta.[1] Wannan babban giɓi ne. Saurin damuwa yana da alaƙa mai ƙarfi da cututtukan fargaba da baƙin ciki mai tsanani,[7] kuma ita ce sifar Big Five da ta fi alaƙa mai ƙarfi (mara kyau) da gamsuwa da aiki.[8]

Binciken kalmomin hali a harsuna dabam-dabam ya kuma gano wani babban ɓangare na shida, gaskiya da tawali’u (Honesty-Humility), wanda ya ƙunshi gaskiya, adalci, guje wa kwaɗayi da tawali’u.[9] Yana hasashen halaye na ɗabi’a ta gari da haɗin kai fiye da Big Five,[10][11] kuma MBTI ko Big Five ba sa auna shi kai tsaye. Jagorarmu kan gaskiya da tawali’u tana bayani kan wannan sifa.

Me game da cognitive functions?

Yawancin al’ummomin nau’i na intanet suna fassara haruffan ta hanyar “cognitive functions” na Jung (misali, “introverted intuition”) da aka jera a ƙayyadadden tsari ga kowane nau’i. McCrae da Costa sun kammala cewa bayanansu suna nuna ka’idar Jung “ko dai ba daidai ba ce, ko kuma MBTI bai aiwatar da ita yadda ya kamata ba, kuma ba za ta iya zama tushe mai inganci na fassara shi ba”.[1] Jerin functions ba sa cikin babban binciken hali na yau, kuma ba ma amfani da su.

Dalilin da ya sa yake jin daidai sosai duk da haka

Jin cewa bayani ya dace da ku shaida ce mai rauni kan ingancin gwaji. A wani shahararren gwaji na 1949, masanin ilimin halayya Bertram Forer ya ba ɗalibai abin da suka ɗauka bayanan hali ne na musamman gare su. Kowa ya sami rubutu iri ɗaya, wanda aka tattara galibi daga littafin taurari na kan titi, kuma ɗaliban sun kimanta shi a matsayin kyakkyawan bayani na kansu.[12] Nazarce-nazarcen baya sun nuna cewa karɓar irin wannan bayani yana ƙaruwa idan yana da kyau, ba shi da takamaimai, kuma an gabatar da shi kamar an tsara shi ne don mutumin.[13]

Bayanan nau’i galibi masu kyau ne, an rubuta su a taƙaice gabaɗaya, kuma ana ba da su a matsayin nau’in “ku”, wanda shi ne girke-girken wannan tasiri. Hakan ba ya sa ma’aunan da ke ƙasa su zama marasa ma’ana, amma yana nufin jin kun gane kanku ba zai iya warware tambayar ba. Ƙari a Shin gwaje-gwajen hali suna da daidaito?

Yadda za a yi amfani da harshen nau’i cikin hikima

Shawarar aiki: ku karanta ƙarfin

Ku duba makinku, ba haruffanku kawai ba. Zaɓi mai ƙarfi (mai nisa da tsakiya) yana gaya muku wani abu; na kan iyaka galibi yana gaya muku cewa kuna matsakaici a wannan sifa.

Shawarar aiki: ku rage girman abin da ya rataya a kai

Ku yi amfani da nau’i don hira da tunani a kan kai, ba don yanke shawara game da wasu mutane ba. Pittenger ya yi gargaɗin cewa kayan aikin wataƙila ba ya goyon bayan yawancin da’awoyin da masu tallata shi suke yi,[4] kuma binciken ƙwazon aiki an gina shi ne a kan ma’aunan sifofi kamar Big Five.[14]

Shawarar aiki: ku guji alamomi kafaffu

Kada ku yi amfani da nau’i a matsayin dalilin da ba za ku iya yin wani abu ba. Sifofi suna sauyawa a tsawon rayuwa, kuma ƙoƙari na da gangan yana kawo sauyin da ake iya aunawa.[6][15]

Yadda 64 Types yake tafiyar da waɗannan matsaloli

Muna riƙe sanannun haruffa huɗu saboda mutane suna ganin suna da amfani, amma muna auna kowanne a matsayin sifar Big Five mai ci gaba da kalaman bincike na jama’a, muna ba da rahoton percentile ɗinku idan aka kwatanta da kusan amsoshi na gaske 20,000, kuma muna yi wa kowace sifa da take cikin maki 10 daga matsakaici alamar kan iyaka, muna nuna lambar da za ku iya samu idan kuka sake gwaji. Muna kuma ƙara sifofi biyu da suka ɓace, natsuwar zuciya (C/R) da gaskiya da tawali’u (M/A), wanda yake ba da nau’o’i 2⁶ = 64. Cikakken bayani yana a shafinmu na kimiyya da kuma a Yadda gwajin 64 Types yake aiki.

Tambayoyin da ake yawan yi

Shin MBTI kimiyyar ƙarya ce?

Ba gabaɗaya ba. Ma’aunansa huɗu suna da alaƙa da sifofi huɗu na Big Five da aka tabbatar da ingancinsu, kuma suna da amincin awo da ya isa.[1][2] Ɓangaren da yake da rauni shi ne da’awar cewa mutane sun kasu zuwa nau’o’i 16 dabam-dabam, wadda rarrabuwar maki ba ta goyon baya.[3]

Me ya sa na sami nau’in MBTI dabam lokacin da na sake yin sa?

Mafi yiwuwa saboda kuna kusa da tsakiya a aƙalla ma’auni ɗaya. Maki suna taruwa a kusa da tsakiya, don haka ƙaramin kuskuren awo zai iya juya harafi, kuma da haruffa huɗu yiwuwar aƙalla ɗaya ya juya tana taruwa.[3][4]

Shin 16Personalities ɗaya yake da MBTI?

A’a. 16Personalities wani gwaji ne dabam na kyauta a intanet daga wani kamfani dabam wanda yake amfani da lambobin haruffa huɗu masu kama da juna. MBTI na hukuma kayan aiki ne dabam. Kada a ɗauki ko ɗaya a matsayin abu ɗaya da ma’aunin Big Five na matakin bincike.

Shin ya kamata ma’aikata su yi amfani da MBTI wajen ɗaukar ma’aikata?

Binciken da yake danganta hali da ƙwazon aiki ya dogara ne da ma’aunan sifofi kamar Big Five, inda ƙwazo shi ne mai hasashe mafi daidaito a dukkan sana’o’i.[14] Alamomin nau’i suna watsar da yawancin wannan bayani, don haka tushe ne mara kyau na yanke shawarar zaɓe.

Majiyoyi

  1. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1989). Reinterpreting the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator from the perspective of the five-factor model of personality. Journal of Personality, 57(1), 17–40.
  2. Capraro, R. M., & Capraro, M. M. (2002). Myers-Briggs Type Indicator score reliability across studies: A meta-analytic reliability generalization study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 62(4), 590–602.
  3. Bess, T. L., & Harvey, R. J. (2002). Bimodal score distributions and the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator: Fact or artifact? Journal of Personality Assessment, 78(1), 176–186.
  4. Pittenger, D. J. (2005). Cautionary comments regarding the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 57(3), 210–221.
  5. Furnham, A. (1996). The big five versus the big four: The relationship between the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) and NEO-PI five factor model of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 21(2), 303–307.
  6. Roberts, B. W., Walton, K. E., & Viechtbauer, W. (2006). Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 132(1), 1–25.
  7. Kotov, R., Gamez, W., Schmidt, F., & Watson, D. (2010). Linking "big" personality traits to anxiety, depressive, and substance use disorders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136(5), 768–821.
  8. Judge, T. A., Heller, D., & Mount, M. K. (2002). Five-factor model of personality and job satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 530–541.
  9. Ashton, M. C., Lee, K., Perugini, M., Szarota, P., de Vries, R. E., Di Blas, L., Boies, K., & De Raad, B. (2004). A six-factor structure of personality-descriptive adjectives: Solutions from psycholexical studies in seven languages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(2), 356–366.
  10. Pletzer, J. L., Bentvelzen, M., Oostrom, J. K., & de Vries, R. E. (2019). A meta-analysis of the relations between personality and workplace deviance: Big Five versus HEXACO. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 112, 369–383.
  11. Thielmann, I., Spadaro, G., & Balliet, D. (2020). Personality and prosocial behavior: A theoretical framework and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 146(1), 30–90.
  12. Forer, B. R. (1949). The fallacy of personal validation: A classroom demonstration of gullibility. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 44(1), 118–123.
  13. Furnham, A., & Schofield, S. (1987). Accepting personality test feedback: A review of the Barnum effect. Current Psychology, 6(2), 162–178.
  14. Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44(1), 1–26.
  15. Hudson, N. W., & Fraley, R. C. (2015). Volitional personality trait change: Can people choose to change their personality traits? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(3), 490–507.

Yadda muke rubuta jagorori: kowace magana ta bincike tana ambaton majiyar da aka wallafa, ana ba da girman tasiri kamar yadda aka wallafa shi, kuma shawarar da ta wuce shaida ana kiranta shawarar aiki. Ku duba hanyoyin aikinmu. Kun ga kuskure? Ku aiko mana da imel a [email protected].

Jagororin da suka shafi wannan